You are not logged in.

Dear visitor, welcome to WesWorld. If this is your first visit here, please read the Help. It explains in detail how this page works. To use all features of this page, you should consider registering. Please use the registration form, to register here or read more information about the registration process. If you are already registered, please login here.

1

Friday, July 23rd 2004, 3:34am

Admiral Apraxin Pic

Is here.

2

Friday, July 23rd 2004, 4:24am

Quite a nice looking design, and as advertised very potent armament wise!

3

Friday, July 23rd 2004, 9:51am

Theres a problem with nicking stuff off other people's drawings; its not always the same scale.

Those triple 150mm guns are huge compared to the rest of the ship. Try these turrets instead;



And shes only heavily armed for the moment...

HoOmAn

Keeper of the Sacred Block Coefficient

  • Send private message

4

Friday, July 23rd 2004, 12:03pm

Russian cruiser

AdmK,

your latest drawing offers some nice details but there are some things to consider.

1.) Main turrets and barbets are out of scale and way too large.

2.) Barbets shouldn´t be larger in diameter than one third of the ships beam due to structural integrity of the hull.

3.) (Aft) Main armament too close to the bows. This is coupled with point 1.). So close to the stern there won´t be enough hull space for barbets of that size, shafts, magazins etc.

I propose to cut away her crane, move everything behind (superstructure, turrets) forward close to the hangar and place new cranes (one at each side) abreast her second funnel.

Regards,

HoOmAn

5

Friday, July 23rd 2004, 2:08pm

Quoted

And shes only heavily armed for the moment...


Are you hinting that the Italian special forces are going to dis-arm her?

I like the design until such time as several of the class deploy to my region. I'd echo the comments made about the drawing.

6

Friday, July 23rd 2004, 5:42pm

Quoted

Are you hinting that the Italian special forces are going to dis-arm her?


The Decima MAS (see avatar) are currently in training and cannot undertake any missions in the near future.

I was actually meaning the arrival of CLs with 15x6" guns in triples. But who knows? there might not be any.

7

Friday, July 23rd 2004, 6:14pm

I've toyed with the idea of a 15 gun CL in my eastern operating areas, but am not yet sold on it.

Problem is, anything over 8,000 t is a Type 1 cruiser, so you'd only be able to operate a few.

Wonder if anybody's ever designed an 18 gun CL...

8

Friday, July 23rd 2004, 6:41pm

Quoted

Wonder if anybody's ever designed an 18 gun CL...


You mean somehing like this? Main gun caliber might not be that big, but still, 18 guns are 18 guns.

Agano, Japan Light Cruiser laid down 1928

Displacement:
7,754 t light; 7,993 t standard; 8,599 t normal; 9,049 t full load
Loading submergence 614 tons/feet

Dimensions:
600.00 ft x 57.00 ft x 17.60 ft (normal load)
182.88 m x 17.37 m x 5.36 m

Armament:
18 - 4.13" / 105 mm guns (6 Main turrets x 3 guns, 4 superfiring turrets)
8 - 2.95" / 75 mm guns (4 2nd turrets x 2 guns)
12 - 1.97" / 50 mm AA guns
24 - 0.98" / 25 mm guns
Weight of broadside 796 lbs / 361 kg
8 - 24.0" / 610 mm above water torpedoes

Armour:
Belt 4.00" / 102 mm, ends unarmoured
Belts cover 111 % of normal area
Main turrets 3.00" / 76 mm, 2nd turrets 1.00" / 25 mm
AA gun shields 1.00" / 25 mm, Light gun shields 1.00" / 25 mm
Armour deck 1.50" / 38 mm, Conning tower 3.00" / 76 mm

Machinery:
Oil fired boilers, steam turbines,
Geared drive, 2 shafts, 86,197 shp / 64,303 Kw = 33.00 kts
Range 5,000nm at 15.00 kts

Complement:
446 - 580

Cost:
£2.790 million / $11.160 million

Distribution of weights at normal displacement:
Armament: 99 tons, 1.2 %
Armour: 1,626 tons, 18.9 %
Belts: 640 tons, 7.4 %, Armament: 362 tons, 4.2 %, Armour Deck: 596 tons, 6.9 %
Conning Tower: 27 tons, 0.3 %, Torpedo bulkhead: 0 tons, 0.0 %
Machinery: 2,684 tons, 31.2 %
Hull, fittings & equipment: 3,345 tons, 38.9 %
Fuel, ammunition & stores: 845 tons, 9.8 %
Miscellaneous weights: 0 tons, 0.0 %

Metacentric height 2.5

Remarks:
Hull space for machinery, storage & compartmentation is adequate
Room for accommodation & workspaces is excellent

Estimated overall survivability and seakeeping ability:
Relative margin of stability: 1.09
Shellfire needed to sink: 8,578 lbs / 3,891 Kg = 242.9 x 4.1 " / 105 mm shells
(Approx weight of penetrating shell hits needed to sink ship excluding critical hits)
Torpedoes needed to sink: 1.3
(Approx number of typical torpedo hits needed to sink ship)
Relative steadiness as gun platform: 68 %
(Average = 50 %)
Relative rocking effect from firing to beam: 0.26
Relative quality as seaboat: 1.02

Hull form characteristics:
Block coefficient: 0.500
Sharpness coefficient: 0.33
Hull speed coefficient 'M': 8.96
'Natural speed' for length: 24.49 kts
Power going to wave formation at top speed: 56 %
Trim: 67
(Maximise stabilty/flotation = 0, Maximise steadiness/seakeeping = 100)

Estimated hull characteristics & strength:
Underwater volume absorbed by magazines and engineering spaces: 110.4 %
Relative accommodation and working space: 136.2 %
(Average = 100%)
Displacement factor: 110 %
(Displacement relative to loading factors)
Relative cross-sectional hull strength: 0.99
(Structure weight / hull surface area: 95 lbs / square foot or 463 Kg / square metre)
Relative longitudinal hull strength: 1.05
(for 18.80 ft / 5.73 m average freeboard, freeboard adjustment 4.11 ft)
Relative composite hull strength: 1.00

9

Saturday, July 24th 2004, 2:14am

I'm very interested in 15x6" and 12x8" designs, and I've even toyed with some drawings. For now Atlantis will consintrate on heavy cruisers and updating its existing ships. Once this is out of the way you can take it to the bank Atlantis will build some light cruisers.