You are not logged in.

Dear visitor, welcome to WesWorld. If this is your first visit here, please read the Help. It explains in detail how this page works. To use all features of this page, you should consider registering. Please use the registration form, to register here or read more information about the registration process. If you are already registered, please login here.

1

Thursday, May 15th 2003, 1:59am

Saved thread - 1934 BB design

Red Admiral
Spammer wanna be
Posts: 1
(4/23/03 9:10:02 am)
1934 BB design
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
First of all I must state that I have no part in this ongoing Sim but wish to observe and give some alternative opinions. If anyone wishes me to leave then please say so.

As an outsider i think that the treaty limits should be kept to, but not stringently because what are limits for if you break them?

The 15"/50 gun is the principle weapon of most BB's i have created tis design has 14" guns bored out from the 15" gun to give a 14"/54 weapon. I have stated the guns as 14" but have left 300t in misc. weight to balance this-sound ok?
On the whole she is armoured like an Elephant: a result of my obligatory quad turrets.

Source code

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
Harris, laid down 1934

Displacement:
        37,952 t light; 39,821 t standard; 42,768 t normal; 44,954 t full load
        Loading submergence 1,447 tons/feet

Dimensions:
        720.00 ft x 105.00 ft x 36.00 ft (normal load)

Armament:
        8 - 14 " (356 mm) (2 Main turrets x 4 guns)
        18 - 5 " (127 mm) (6 2nd turrets x 3 guns)
        32 - 1.56 " (40 mm) AA
        Weight of broadside 12,162 lbs (5,521 kg)

Armour:
        Belt 16.00 ", ends unarmoured, belts cover 75 % of normal area
        Main turrets 26.00 ", 2nd turrets 3.00 ", AA gun shields 1.00 "
        Armour deck 10.00 ", Conning tower 3.00 ", Torpedo bulkhead 2.00 "

Machinery:
        140,000 shp steam turbines, oil fired boilers = 29.08 kts, range 10,000nm at 15.00 kts

Complement:
        1,486 - 1,933

Cost:
        £15.558 million / $62.232 million

Distribution of weights at normal displacement:
        Armament: 1,520 tons, 3.6 %
        Armour: 17,972 tons, 42.0 %
        Belts: 2,956 tons, 6.9 %, Armament: 4,319 tons, 10.1 %, Armour Deck: 9,370 tons, 21.9 %
        Conning Tower: 79 tons, 0.2 %, Torpedo bulkhead: 1,247 tons, 2.9 %
        Machinery: 4,028 tons, 9.4 %
        Hull, fittings & equipment: 14,133 tons, 33.0 %
        Fuel, ammunition & stores: 4,816 tons, 11.3 %
        Miscellaneous weights: 300 tons, 0.7 %

        Metacentric height 5.8

Remarks:
        Hull space for machinery, storage & compartmentation is excellent
        Room for accommodation & workspaces is excellent

Estimated overall survivability and seakeeping ability:
        Relative margin of stability: 1.04
        Shellfire needed to sink: 51,518 lbs = 37.5 x 14.0 " shells
        (Approx weight of penetrating shell hits needed to sink ship excluding critical hits)
        Torpedoes needed to sink: 8.0
        (Approx number of typical torpedo hits needed to sink ship)
        Relative steadiness as gun platform: 66 %
        (Average = 50 %)
        Relative rocking effect from firing to beam: 0.45
        Relative quality as seaboat: 1.10

Hull form characteristics:
        Block coefficient: 0.55
        Sharpness coefficient: 0.39
        Hull speed coefficient 'M': 6.30
        'Natural speed' for length: 26.83 kts
        Power going to wave formation at top speed: 54 %
        Trim: 60
        (Maximise stabilty/flotation = 0, Maximise steadiness/seakeeping = 100)

Estimated hull characteristics & strength:
        Underwater volume absorbed by magazines and engineering spaces: 73.7 %
        Relative accommodation and working space: 142.8 %
        (Average = 100%)
        Displacement factor: 111 %
        (Displacement relative to loading factors)
        Relative cross-sectional hull strength: 0.95
        (Structure weight per square foot of hull surface: 188 lbs)
        Relative longitudinal hull strength: 1.52
        (for 22.00 ft average freeboard, freeboard adjustment 1.75 ft)
        Relative composite hull strength: 1.00



AdmKuznetsov
Spammer wanna be
Posts: 19
(4/23/03 11:19:15 am)
Re: 1934 BB design
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What's the threat this ship is intended to face? Small marine mammals that eat the eggs? ;)

A juggernaut, no doubt about it. And good speed too. Would it happen to have a ram? Might be a feasable tactic with this thing. The only hope is to put many holes in the unarmored bow below the waterline to slow it down, and jam a turret with a non-penetrating hit. Fortunately, this last one only has to happen twice. Then close and destroy. A 16" belt will not repel Russian 356mm or 381mm rounds at 18000m and 21000m respectively.

Visit my Russian/French fantasy fleet page:
admkuznetsov.tripod.com

Red Admiral
Spammer wanna be
Posts: 2
(4/23/03 3:12:34 pm)
Re: 1934 BB design
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Well supposing my country is strictly neutral in this scenario it needs protection from marauding navies. A fleet of ships based on this would be unnerving especially with my country operating 2 ships together at all times.

Another version has 4 turrets but 16" turret armour.



I have no part in the sim.