H-class , Atlantis Destroyer leader laid down 1928

Mr. Valentines Day

Sunday, April 30th 2006, 6:26pm

I know you did. Long live speed! :-)
I added it to the list because the cross sectional was below 0.50 but I was aware that you accepted that structural weakness of the ship in order to get the fastest simmed ship.

Go to the top of the page

AdmKuznetsov

Sage

Posts: 2,918

22

Sunday, April 30th 2006, 8:39pm

Medniy

That was my attempt to sim an MTB.

Didn't work too well.

If you really want to see something, check out her block coefficient.

Go to the top of the page

Rooijen10

Mr. Valentines Day

Posts: 9,644

23

Sunday, April 30th 2006, 9:01pm

I thought it was better to ignore that. :-)

Go to the top of the page

thesmilingassassin

The Chosen One

Posts: 13,513

24

Sunday, April 30th 2006, 9:35pm

Quoted

Originally posted by Rooijen10
It is interesting that the earliest Sharp DD sims I have are from Wednesday, April 30, 2003 while the last springstyle DD sims are on Sunday, April 13, 2003... so this unwritten rule came in existence about the time that Spring Sharp was introduced.

There is an awefull lot editing thats been done, I suppose to correct flaws. Some designs are also converted from older springstyle files.

I'm going to modify the H class ships but the Basillone and Admiralty Type 2 class ships will stay the same, they were definately designed before we cracked down on the CS hull strength. They are also 35 knot designs.

Go to the top of the page

Rooijen10

Mr. Valentines Day

Posts: 9,644

25

Sunday, April 30th 2006, 9:39pm

Well, you could keep H class as it is but accept the fact that it has a weaker hull just as the Italian Bari has.

Go to the top of the page

thesmilingassassin

The Chosen One

Posts: 13,513

26

Sunday, April 30th 2006, 9:54pm

I suppose I could but then this 2 page discussion would be a waste of time wouldn't it?

Go to the top of the page

Rooijen10

Mr. Valentines Day

Posts: 9,644

27

Sunday, April 30th 2006, 9:57pm

Maybe, but I don't think it is boring to waste time on this discussion.
^_^
Besides, if you mention to us that you keep the H-class as it is, the result would be that we know that you are aware of the low x-sectional HS and that you accept the weakness of the hull that comes with it... so the two pages of discussing this would not have been in vain.