You are not logged in.

Dear visitor, welcome to WesWorld. If this is your first visit here, please read the Help. It explains in detail how this page works. To use all features of this page, you should consider registering. Please use the registration form, to register here or read more information about the registration process. If you are already registered, please login here.

1

Saturday, November 8th 2003, 11:25pm

The Laooland aircraftcarrier

This is swedens first aircraftcarrier(and my first carrier design aswell)

Originally laid down as 35000 ton BB converted on the stocks to a CV.

How many aircraft can she accomodate? How large planes? (I was thinking of Hawker Harts and Gloster Gladiators)

Lappland, Sweden Aircraftcarrier laid down 1932

Displacement:
31 913 t light; 32 658 t standard; 35 000 t normal; 36 733 t full load
Loading submergence 1 516 tons/feet

Dimensions:
656,17 ft x 104,99 ft x 26,25 ft (normal load)
200,00 m x 32,00 m x 8,00 m

Armament:
12 - 4,13" / 105 mm guns
20 - 2,24" / 57 mm guns
20 - 0,98" / 25 mm AA guns
Weight of broadside 546 lbs / 248 kg

Armour:
Belt 5,91" / 150 mm, ends unarmoured
Belts cover 120 % of normal area
Main gun shields 2,95" / 75 mm, 2nd gun shields 0,39" / 10 mm
Armour deck 0,98" / 25 mm, Conning tower 5,91" / 150 mm

Machinery:
Oil fired boilers, steam turbines,
Geared drive, 4 shafts, 159 412 shp / 118 921 Kw = 30,00 kts
Range 10 000nm at 14,00 kts

Complement:
1 279 - 1 663

Cost:
£8,332 million / $33,328 million

Distribution of weights at normal displacement:
Armament: 68 tons, 0,2 %
Armour: 2 812 tons, 8,0 %
Belts: 1 612 tons, 4,6 %, Armament: 97 tons, 0,3 %, Armour Deck: 966 tons, 2,8 %
Conning Tower: 137 tons, 0,4 %, Torpedo bulkhead: 0 tons, 0,0 %
Machinery: 4 705 tons, 13,4 %
Hull, fittings & equipment: 14 328 tons, 40,9 %
Fuel, ammunition & stores: 3 087 tons, 8,8 %
Miscellaneous weights: 10 000 tons, 28,6 %

Metacentric height 5,7

Remarks:
Hull space for machinery, storage & compartmentation is excellent
Room for accommodation & workspaces is excellent
Ship has slow, easy roll, a good, steady gun platform
Excellent seaboat, comfortable and able to fight her guns in the heaviest weather

Estimated overall survivability and seakeeping ability:
Relative margin of stability: 1,03
Shellfire needed to sink: 62 452 lbs / 28 328 Kg = 1 768,1 x 4,1 " / 105 mm shells
(Approx weight of penetrating shell hits needed to sink ship excluding critical hits)
Torpedoes needed to sink: 4,3
(Approx number of typical torpedo hits needed to sink ship)
Relative steadiness as gun platform: 83 %
(Average = 50 %)
Relative rocking effect from firing to beam: 0,02
Relative quality as seaboat: 1,66

Hull form characteristics:
Block coefficient: 0,678
Sharpness coefficient: 0,45
Hull speed coefficient 'M': 6,14
'Natural speed' for length: 25,62 kts
Power going to wave formation at top speed: 61 %
Trim: 50
(Maximise stabilty/flotation = 0, Maximise steadiness/seakeeping = 100)

Estimated hull characteristics & strength:
Underwater volume absorbed by magazines and engineering spaces: 76,9 %
Relative accommodation and working space: 311,2 %
(Average = 100%)
Displacement factor: 154 %
(Displacement relative to loading factors)
Relative cross-sectional hull strength: 1,20
(Structure weight / hull surface area: 178 lbs / square foot or 867 Kg / square metre)
Relative longitudinal hull strength: 3,45
(for 39,37 ft / 12,00 m average freeboard, freeboard adjustment 19,92 ft)
Relative composite hull strength: 1,34


2

Sunday, November 9th 2003, 12:27am

Well, when looking at the springstyle notes, 10,000 tons of miscellaneous load will give you 100 planes. When looking at the dimensions, you'll get (656.17x104.99)/750=91.86 planes. The ships carried by the carrier is the lower of the two numbers thus 91.
... but how big the planes can be in reality is a good question. Looking at the size of the CV, it would not be a good idea to use planes the size of an F-14. Looking at the dimensions of the Hart and the Gladiator, I think 91 planes might just fit... although it is also possible that all 91 might not fit at all.

Walter

HoOmAn

Keeper of the Sacred Block Coefficient

  • Send private message

3

Sunday, November 9th 2003, 1:54am

Size

IIRC, the rules to design a CV with springstyle speak of planes of WW2 vintage. Thus a F-14 surely is too big (that one´s even larger and heavier than a B-25) but a Gloster Gladiator seems to fit quite good.

Just my ille-informed opinion of course... :)

HoOmAn

4

Sunday, November 9th 2003, 2:28am

make that well-informed but ill-grammared ;-)

*ducks and runs*

Bernhard

5

Sunday, November 9th 2003, 10:22pm

A pic of her

I have uploaded a picture and some extra facts about her on my homepage.

The Uppland Heavy cruiser is also new

comments please

6

Monday, November 10th 2003, 12:57am

lol

Hoo I wouldn't worry about Grammar, half my posts would make a preschool teacher cringe!


HoOmAn

Keeper of the Sacred Block Coefficient

  • Send private message

7

Monday, November 10th 2003, 1:42am

Grrrrr....

*preparing nuclear strike*

:P

8

Monday, November 10th 2003, 1:55am

lol

As usual geosites dosn't work for me.....sigh.....bastards!

as for that nuclear strike..........
*practices duck and cover!*

9

Monday, November 10th 2003, 6:17pm

This typo occurs on your Uppland-class page;
Displacement 1000t, surely this should be 10,000t.

It is a nice picture, but the forward superstructure seems a bit small.