Dear visitor, welcome to WesWorld. If this is your first visit here, please read the Help. It explains in detail how this page works. To use all features of this page, you should consider registering. Please use the registration form, to register here or read more information about the registration process. If you are already registered, please login here.
The Cannone da 75/32 modello 37 is certainly a piece that would be logical to have a part in the Italian artillery park, particularly as you would no longer have a light field gun or howitzer in the 105mm range, the Cannone da 105/28 (aka Schneider M1913) being a corps level heavy field gun.
I am a bit mystified by the idea of a self-propelled Obice da 210/22 modello 35. Historically, SP versions of such heavy artillery were few and far between, though I believe a few were employed by the US Army. Is there a particular reason for developing such a combination?
The Cannone da 75/32 modello 37 is certainly a piece that would be logical to have a part in the Italian artillery park, particularly as you would no longer have a light field gun or howitzer in the 105mm range, the Cannone da 105/28 (aka Schneider M1913) being a corps level heavy field gun.
I was thinking a SP version for the 210 would be nice due to improved tactical mobility as opposed to towed carriage. If Im to early in this thinking for big guns, it can wait.I am a bit mystified by the idea of a self-propelled Obice da 210/22 modello 35. Historically, SP versions of such heavy artillery were few and far between, though I believe a few were employed by the US Army. Is there a particular reason for developing such a combination?
So no qualms about introducing ether gun at the historical date even tho it is past?
So no qualms about introducing ether gun at the historical date even tho it is past?
For the towed carriages, no qualms. For the self-propelled 210, I require further information to make a decision.
Forum Software: Burning Board® Lite 2.1.2 pl 1, developed by WoltLab® GmbH