Dear visitor, welcome to WesWorld. If this is your first visit here, please read the Help. It explains in detail how this page works. To use all features of this page, you should consider registering. Please use the registration form, to register here or read more information about the registration process. If you are already registered, please login here.
Quoted
[size=3]Annex A - Romania[/size]
Romania may possess:
Capital ships: Unlimited capital ship tonnage (light tonnage)
Heavy/Armoured Cruisers: 34,000 tons (light tonnage)
Light Cruisers: 32,000 tons (light tonnage)
Destroyers: 32,000 tons (light tonnage)
Torpedo Boats: 15,000 tons (light tonnage)
Coast Defense Ships/Monitors: 6,250 tons (light tonnage)
Submarines: 6,250 tons (light tonnage)
Quoted
[size=3]Annex B - Bulgaria[/size]
Bulgaria may possess:
Capital ships: 50,000 tons (light tonnage)
Heavy/Armoured Cruisers: 27,000 tons (light tonnage)
Light Cruisers: 25,000 tons (light tonnage)
Destroyers: 25,000 tons (light tonnage)
Torpedo Boats: 10,000 tons (light tonnage)
Coast Defense Ships: 5,000 tons (light tonnage)
Submarines: 5,000 tons (light tonnage)
Quoted
[size=3]Annex C - Vessel Restrictions[/size]
C.1 - Neither side will build or buy a capital ship of over 25,000 tons light, or with guns larger than 15".
C.2 - Neither side will build or buy a coast-defense ship larger than 2,000 tons light.
C.3 - There will be no limit on:
------ Craft of under 700t light
------ Minesweepers of under 1,000t light
------ Sail-training vessels of any size
------ Unarmed freighters, tugboats, lighters, trawlers, lightships, or any other vessel or craft armed with any gun smaller than 20mm.
------ Any Landing Craft or Landing Ships not covered by the above.
Quoted
[size=3]Annex D - Current Romanian Navy, 1935[/size]
Capital ships: 14,986 tons (41,506 tons building)
Heavy/Armoured Cruisers: 25,720 tons
Light Cruisers: 3,549 tons
Destroyers: 19,268 tons
Torpedo Boats: 2,655 tons
Coast Defense Ships: 0 tons
Submarines: 1,520 tons[/b]
Quoted
[size=3]Annex E - Current Bulgarian Navy, 1935[/size]
Capital ships: 23,022 tons
Heavy/Armoured Cruisers: 0 tons
Light Cruisers: 3,349 tons (13,886 building)
Destroyers: 0 tons
Torpedo Boats: 11,369 tons
Coast Defense Ships: 0 tons
Submarines: 0 tons
Quoted
[size=3]Annex F - Definitions[/size]
For purposes of this treaty, measurements are made by Light Tonnage only.
Quoted
Originally posted by Vukovlad
With out Turkey participating this treaty has no gains for Romania
Quoted
Originally posted by TheCanadian
Quoted
Originally posted by Vukovlad
With out Turkey participating this treaty has no gains for Romania
Your correct, the treaty as it stands does not impede Turkey in any way shape or form. Curiously enough, Turkey and Romania both have 6 IP factories (though that will probably eventually change). However, I never set out to impede Turkish shipbuilding in any way, realizing such a path would get me nowhere without also trying to impede Greek shipbuilding (and thats probably out of the question). Though the Treaty of Dodrich is very popular in Romania, Bulgaria does remain the #2 potential enemy due to the fact that they are militarily stronger than any other potential enemy except Russia. Therefore, this treaty is one step closer to good ties with the Bulgarians.
Quoted
Originally posted by Vukovlad
Quoted
Originally posted by TheCanadian
Quoted
Originally posted by Vukovlad
With out Turkey participating this treaty has no gains for Romania
Your correct, the treaty as it stands does not impede Turkey in any way shape or form. Curiously enough, Turkey and Romania both have 6 IP factories (though that will probably eventually change). However, I never set out to impede Turkish shipbuilding in any way, realizing such a path would get me nowhere without also trying to impede Greek shipbuilding (and thats probably out of the question). Though the Treaty of Dodrich is very popular in Romania, Bulgaria does remain the #2 potential enemy due to the fact that they are militarily stronger than any other potential enemy except Russia. Therefore, this treaty is one step closer to good ties with the Bulgarians.
I have ofcourse very limited interest in what is going on in the Black Sea but if I were Romania I wouldnt sign an agreement that doesnt include Turkey or at least limits the Turkish tonnage in the Black Sea (this of course is of dubious value)
Quoted
Originally posted by Vukovlad
The word to pay attention to here is "technically", remember that Turkey has NO agreement with Armenia/Axerbaijan and yet is willing to go to war for them (but not for Smyrna..). So if they are willing to war for nations that they have no ties to, do you think they will turn their back on an ally?
Quoted
Originally posted by Vukovlad
I have ofcourse very limited interest in what is going on in the Black Sea but if I were Romania I wouldnt sign an agreement that doesnt include Turkey or at least limits the Turkish tonnage in the Black Sea (this of course is of dubious value)
Quoted
Originally posted by Vukovlad
The word to pay attention to here is "technically", remember that Turkey has NO agreement with Armenia/Axerbaijan and yet is willing to go to war for them (but not for Smyrna..). So if they are willing to war for nations that they have no ties to, do you think they will turn their back on an ally?
Quoted
Originally posted by TheCanadian
This is all hypothetical however, Romania is NOT going to break Dodrich, unless attacked, and the Bulgarians no longer have any reason to.
Forum Software: Burning Board® Lite 2.1.2 pl 1, developed by WoltLab® GmbH