Dear visitor, welcome to WesWorld. If this is your first visit here, please read the Help. It explains in detail how this page works. To use all features of this page, you should consider registering. Please use the registration form, to register here or read more information about the registration process. If you are already registered, please login here.
Quoted
Originally posted by Valles
http://i31.photobucket.com/albums/c386/v…f/Mushroom1.png
Quoted
Originally posted by Desertfox
Carrier planes land pretty flat, with hardly any flare, there should be no issues with pushers.
This post has been edited 1 times, last edit by "Valles" (Mar 13th 2012, 3:37am)
Quoted
Originally posted by Valles
Option 3: Pusher/Radial
- Pros: Existing Nordmark experience with type (Saab 21), excellent approach/ground visibility, canard-types fairly compact, durability
- Cons: Prop fouling and clearance issues, canard-types relatively undeveloped, requires multiple or imported engines for larger aircraft
Quoted
Originally posted by Brockpaine
Two notes: first, the Saab 21, if it's similar to the historical one, has an inline engine, not a radial. Second, I think pusher radials usually had some issues with cooling; the only ones I recall were in wing-mounted twin engine applications, where they could have nacelles facing forward.
Also, the advantages and disadvantages you make for some of the various different types are, in my opinion, not inherently endemic to the layouts per se, but rather a function of the aircraft's individual design.
Forum Software: Burning Board® Lite 2.1.2 pl 1, developed by WoltLab® GmbH