Dear visitor, welcome to WesWorld. If this is your first visit here, please read the Help. It explains in detail how this page works. To use all features of this page, you should consider registering. Please use the registration form, to register here or read more information about the registration process. If you are already registered, please login here.
Quoted
Would Dynamite Guns have the range required to hit the canal locks from a safe distance?
Quoted
This type certainly would be a deterent for those pesky Iberians should they try to push Mexico round.
Quoted
Hey theres always the Mexican canal!
Quoted
Base bleed, rocket boosted, or glider shells?
Quoted
Originally posted by Red Admiral
Quoted
Hey theres always the Mexican canal!
Which would likely suffer a similar fate extremely quickly.
Quoted
a three front war for the AANM.
Quoted
Originally posted by Red Admiral
All this talk on this Mexican canal. I think an optimistic estimate for it's completion would be 1960, it'd probably take far longer. A canal is/has/currently planned through Nicaragura. Estimated time to complete is 12 years with current technology. It is also massively helped by having the majority of its course through a lake and river and only having 50m altitude to descend/ascend. The proposed Mexican canal is an entirely different kettle of fish. It is far longer, follows no large watercourse, rises to a far greater altitude, is being built in 1930. 1960 is a very optimistic estimate.
Quoted
Originally posted by Red Admiral
Quoted
a three front war for the AANM.
Shouldn't it be everyone vs. Mexico?
Quoted
Originally posted by Ithekro
Wouldn't it be easier to blow something up in the locks? I do not know what kinds of procedures the Canal has, having not been on a ship passing through them yet. However a frieghter on a suicide mission to wreck the locks would be about as costly (save in lifes) as the submarine...
Forum Software: Burning Board® Lite 2.1.2 pl 1, developed by WoltLab® GmbH