Dear visitor, welcome to WesWorld. If this is your first visit here, please read the Help. It explains in detail how this page works. To use all features of this page, you should consider registering. Please use the registration form, to register here or read more information about the registration process. If you are already registered, please login here.
Quoted
Originally posted by Hood
Going through the old UK reports when Gravina was player when looking to see if any of the X-1 class submarines were built I noticed Gravina built two new aircraft tenders, HMS Pegass ans HMS Maidstone in 1927.
No stats made their way to the encylopedia but I wondered if any of the older players who can remember five years ago can ever recall any stats or where they might be posted.
Quoted
Originally posted by Hood
If none exist would anyone have objections if I reverese-engineered them from the 1927 report tonnages paid to make a new SS report?
This post has been edited 1 times, last edit by "Hood" (Oct 20th 2010, 6:44pm)
This post has been edited 3 times, last edit by "Hood" (Apr 19th 2011, 11:12pm)
This post has been edited 2 times, last edit by "Hood" (Apr 20th 2011, 11:03pm)
Quoted
Originally posted by RLBH
Aieee! My sanity!
I made the fatal mistake of digging up the dregs of past UK reports, and found that there are duplicated reports for 1925 to 1927 (ish), which don't match. I'm treating those produced by Alt Naval as "canon", since I wasn't aware of the alternate option until about five minutes ago.
However, Gravina's reports make extensive reference to the DE22 and DE23 classes - which, at least, I should have - and also DE24, DE25 and DE26 classes, which I assume are lost to the duplicate reports. That accounts for the "40 to 70" figure for DEs in the order of battle.
However, I haven't the remotest notion what these ships actually are, despite searching the forums. I can only assume they are some sort of derivative of the so-called "Defiant" torpedo boats, unless someone can enlighten me...
Quoted
Originally posted by RLBH
I will consider a proportion of new factories to be located in Canada. For example, consider Canada to have 10 factories and the rest of the British Empire (excluding Australia) 40. If 5 factories are built, the fifth would be considered Canadian - keeping the two in proportion.
Does this sound fair?
RLBH
Quoted
Originally posted by ShinRa_Inc
It also appears I may be owed some factories...
http://wesworld.jk-clan.de/thread.php?postid=25948#post25948
Quoted
Originally posted by RLBH
I will consider a proportion of new factories to be located in Canada. For example, consider Canada to have 10 factories and the rest of the British Empire (excluding Australia) 40. If 5 factories are built, the fifth would be considered Canadian - keeping the two in proportion.
Does this sound fair?
RLBH
Quoted
Originally posted by Brockpaine
Quoted
Originally posted by ShinRa_Inc
It also appears I may be owed some factories...
http://wesworld.jk-clan.de/thread.php?postid=25948#post25948
Quoted
Originally posted by RLBH
I will consider a proportion of new factories to be located in Canada. For example, consider Canada to have 10 factories and the rest of the British Empire (excluding Australia) 40. If 5 factories are built, the fifth would be considered Canadian - keeping the two in proportion.
Does this sound fair?
RLBH
It would appear to me that that's not the course past British players elected to go, as Canada only had ten when it became a player country. In any case, we're trying to determine correct ship totals, not redistribute Great Britain's factories. What's done is done, so far as I'm concerned.
Quoted
Originally posted by thesmilingassassin
Agreed, it would also seem unfair to some, I'd think, that Canada somehow gains free factory's?
Forum Software: Burning Board® Lite 2.1.2 pl 1, developed by WoltLab® GmbH