Dear visitor, welcome to WesWorld. If this is your first visit here, please read the Help. It explains in detail how this page works. To use all features of this page, you should consider registering. Please use the registration form, to register here or read more information about the registration process. If you are already registered, please login here.
This post has been edited 1 times, last edit by "Kaiser Kirk" (May 8th 2012, 9:00pm)
Quoted
Originally posted by Kaiser Kirk
Well,
actually that is a comment- that it is not useful.
Quoted
Originally posted by Brockpaine
I recognize that you don't want to provide dates, but without dates I just can't work out whether it's too fast, too slow, or goldilocks.
Quoted
Originally posted by Brockpaine
but unfortunately, the rest of the world has apparently decided we're not in 1941, but 1945, and they've introduced tanks more suitable to that era than this. Catch-22 for me, I'm afraid: if I introduce what ought to be historical, then I'm quite far behind everyone else; if I introduce stuff comparable to theirs, then I'm giving them justification to field even more advanced stuff even further in advance.
Quoted
Originally posted by Hood
So far, I've intention to introduce PIAT. The Boys AT rfile is still in use. There is little demand for anything new until a war comes along. Plus it was a damn akward weapon to reload with that spigot.
This post has been edited 1 times, last edit by "Kaiser Kirk" (May 9th 2012, 3:12am)
Quoted
Originally posted by Brockpaine
but without dates, it has no context for me to catalog the information in my brain. It's like posting a Springsharp which lists only the guns and armour, but not the speed or tonnage. I just can't file the data in a meaningful manner for analysis.
Quoted
Originally posted by TheCanadian
On one hand I can somewhat understand Kirk's reluctance to provide dates for when variants enter service, though from the information you posted on the T-35/41 I have a general idea of when these tanks are in service. Providing a date in one sense means providing the fodder for an argument of "this tanks too early, this innovation is too early, blah blah blah."
Quoted
Originally posted by TheCanadian
On the other hand it also means that its difficult to plan a conflict with someone with whom your unsure of what forces they can bring to bear. So the end result is the stagnation of the game, where one party refuses to script a conflict without at least some knowledge beforehand, (an understandable approach and one I agree with to some extent) whereas the other party refuses to give that knowledge for a variety of reasons.
Quoted
Originally posted by TheCanadian
see the profit of those discussions even now, where to my view at least the game has stagnated somewhat.
Quoted
Originally posted by TheCanadian
I realize this is Just A Naval Sim, but the Land and Air aspects are important.
This post has been edited 1 times, last edit by "Kaiser Kirk" (May 9th 2012, 7:13am)
Forum Software: Burning Board® Lite 2.1.2 pl 1, developed by WoltLab® GmbH