Dear visitor, welcome to WesWorld. If this is your first visit here, please read the Help. It explains in detail how this page works. To use all features of this page, you should consider registering. Please use the registration form, to register here or read more information about the registration process. If you are already registered, please login here.
Quoted
I will support fou capital ships, either the notion of old KGV's and a QE - which is the force mix Australia started with, and thus helped frame my negotiating positions - or a QE and some of the older BCs.
Quoted
This started out as a "replace Nordmark" discussion, and suddenly we've got Siam, Chile, Mexico, Australia 2.0, Turkey and maybe Nordmark. This is not the first time it's happened, but I sincerely hope it'll be the last.
Quoted
If Nordmark isn't filled this time 'round, it should be condemned to the NPC pile and the moderators should determine the outcome of the South Atlantic conflict of 1921. I'm tired of worrying about it.
Quoted
The biggest problem for Britain is that Nordmark has taken over many Battleship projects that it or the U.S. undertook in South America, as such we need to explain why Britain is still a dominant power in the Atlantic given the presence of Atlantis, Nordmark and a unified Iberia.
Quoted
IIRC historically Britain planned to build 3 extra R class BB's and justify thier building by claiming they were for Canada's defence, therefore I don't think its unreasonable to think that Britain would transfer an Iron Duke to canada.
Quoted
and Nordmark does have aspirations in Canada's northern territory's if I remember correctly.
Quoted
*looks around for Chinese cookbook...*
Quoted
With SAINT and SANTA suffering from the loss of Nordmark this balance of power is somewhat tilted
Quoted
Most of the discussion around new "PC's" revolves around existing players taking on a little more in order to spice things up in area's
Forum Software: Burning Board® Lite 2.1.2 pl 1, developed by WoltLab® GmbH