You are not logged in.

Dear visitor, welcome to WesWorld. If this is your first visit here, please read the Help. It explains in detail how this page works. To use all features of this page, you should consider registering. Please use the registration form, to register here or read more information about the registration process. If you are already registered, please login here.

1

Sunday, April 4th 2004, 8:48pm

Atlantis Q4/22

A. Industrial Allocation

7/27 factories to naval materials: 7,000 tons created for Q4/1922

20/27 factories (committed) to infrastructure development: 2.0 points for Q4/1922


B. Infrastructure Development

1 new factory (#28) with 10 points to be completed by the end of Q4/1922
needs 0.0 points to complete
1 new factory (#29) with 2.0 points completed by the end of Q1/1924 needs 8.0 points to complete
1 new factory started (#30)

0.6 points added to factory #28 in Q4/1922.
Factory completed at end of quarter.
1.0 points added to factory #29 in Q4/1922.
0.4 points added to factory #30 in Q4/1922

C. Naval Construction

At Cleito
Class 4 Slip #1 - Idle
Class 4 Slip #2 - M-1 moniter
Class 4 Drydock #1 - BB Aggamemnon converting to Gunnery training ship, 300 tons used
Class 4 Drydock #2 - Idle
Class 1 Slip #1 - Idle
Class 1 Slip #2 - Idle
Class 1 Slip #3 - Idle


At Eridanus

Class 4 Slip #1 - Idle
Class 4 Slip #2 - M2 moniter
Class 4 Drydock #1 - Idle
Class 4 Drydock #2 - Idle
Class 2 Slip #1 - Idle
Class 2 Drydock #1 - Idle
Class 1 Slip #1 - Idle
Class 1 Slip #2 - Idle

At Duecalion
Class 3 Slip #1 - Idle
Class 3 Slip #2 - Idle
Class 3 Drydock #1 - Idle
Class 2 Slip #1 - Idle
Class 2 Slip #1 - Idle
Class 2 Drydock #1 - Idle

At Illissus
Class 3 Slip #1 - Idle
Class 3 Slip #2 - Idle
Class 3 Drydock #1 - CVX Active converting to CLL, 300 tons used
Class 2 Slip #1 - Idle
Class 2 Drydock #1 - Idle
Class 1 Slip #1 - Idle
Class 1 Slip #2 - Idle

At Phelleus
Class 3 Slip #1 - Idle
Class 3 Slip #2 - Idle
Class 3 Drydock #1 - Idle
Class 3 Drydock #2 - Idle
Class 5 Drydock #1 - Idle
Class 1 Slip #1 - Idle
Class 1 Slip #2 - Idle
Class 1 Slip #3 - Idle

At Lycabettus
Class 2 Slip #1 - Idle
Class 2 Slip #2 - Idle
Class 2 Drydock #1 - Idle
Class 2 Drydock #2 - Idle
Class 1 Slip #1 - Idle
Class 1 Slip #2 - Idle
Class 1 Slip #3 - Idle
Class 1 Drydock #1 - Idle

At Maracaibo
Class 3 Drydock #1 - Idle
Class 1 Slip #1 - Idle
Class 1 Slip #2 - Idle
Class 0 Slip #1 - Idle
Class 0 Slip #2 - Idle

At Safi
Class 2 Drydock #1 - Idle
Class 1 Slip #1 - Idle
Class 1 Slip #2 - Idle
Class 1 Drydock #1 - Idle


Launched ships being completed:

Arrogant class carriers

Arrogant - 2000 tons needed, to complete by 1/4/23. 1,000 tons added in Q4/1922,
Fearless - 3000 tons needed, to complete by 1/7/23. 1,000 tons added in Q4/1922

Moniters

M1, Moniter - 2000 tons needed, to complete by 2/7/23
1000 tons added in Q4/22
M2, Moniter - 2000 tons needed, to complete by 8/7/23
1000 tons added in Q4/22

Improved eridanus class light cruisers

Valencia - completed starts trials
Ascanius - 600 tons needed, to complete by 8/12/22.
600 tons added in Q3/1922
Maracaibo - 600 tons needed, to complete by 9/12/22.
600 tons added in Q3/1922
Caracus - 600 tons needed, to complete by 14/12/22. 600 tons added in Q3/1922

Ships completed and on trials

CL Valencia

D. Transactions

None.

E. Other Notes

CVX Active converting to CLL
BB Aggamemnon converting to gunnery training ship

F. Updated Order of Battle, 1/1/22

Note: X(Y)+Z = completed/in service (under repair/refit/rebuild) + under construction. CLL=large light cruiser

BB: 9(1)0
CV: 2(1)2
CA: 10(0)0
CAE:0(0)0
CLL: 14(1)0
CL: 31(3)0
DD: 128(0)0
Torpedo boats: N/A
Moniters:0(0)2
Torpedo gunboats: 32(0)0
Gunboats 12(0)0
Patrol vessels 50(0)0
Sub chasers 105(0)0
Floatplane carrier/tenders 4(0)0
Fleet Submarine: 20(0)0
Coastal Submarine: 60(0)0
Auxillary's N/A


*please note* I have discovered errors in my tonnage useage tallys. Tonnage needed to complete statements on my Caracus class cruisers are incorrect but individual tonnage useage per year is correct. In quarter 3/22 the Caracus class crusiers needed 1200 tons to complete not 1600, the corrections have been made. I also discovered some indescrepency's in the completion of my factory's due to my missunderstanding of the factory infrastructure rules. I will check past quarterly reports and make the proper ajustments.

2

Sunday, April 4th 2004, 8:55pm

Could you give any stats for M-1 and M-2? unless i find them in another thread...

3

Sunday, April 4th 2004, 8:59pm

They should be tacked on to one of the quarterly reports, my guess is its Q2/21 when they were laid down....I'll look for them anyway.

4

Sunday, April 4th 2004, 9:01pm

Don't worry i found them. Good to know they really are monitors and not coastal defense ships or Escort cruisers.

5

Sunday, April 4th 2004, 9:04pm

Heh heh, I don't think Italy has to much to worry about Atlantis. Interest in the central mediterranean is next to non-existant. I don't think you'll see any bombardment force off naples any time soon.

6

Sunday, April 4th 2004, 9:09pm

I think if M-1 and M-2 showed up bombarding Naples they might find a surprise or 8 ;-) That's 8x12"/40 guns on both peninsulas.

I must make some post about my coastal defences.

7

Sunday, April 4th 2004, 9:18pm

Rest assured those Moniters wouldn't venture along an enemy coastline alone, they would have some heavy's backing them up. For now they will be used for training and patrol purposes.

8

Monday, April 12th 2004, 7:12pm

Corrections have been made to Q3/22. The factory points were incorrect for factory #28, it was listed as 8.4 at the end of the quarter and not the proper 9.4 points. This has been corrected and the original date of completion IS the end of Q4/22. I seem to be confusing points needed with points tallied at the end of the quarter! This also throws the other factory totals out which have been corrected in Q4/22.

9

Monday, April 12th 2004, 7:14pm

Glad to see that I am not the only one who makes errors.
:-)

Walter

10

Monday, April 12th 2004, 8:09pm

Indeed....it all started with a oversight in reguards to infrastruture rules and snowballed from there! Thankfully I have devised a rough layout for infrastructure developements for the future to make it easier to spot my errors.