Dear visitor, welcome to WesWorld. If this is your first visit here, please read the Help. It explains in detail how this page works. To use all features of this page, you should consider registering. Please use the registration form, to register here or read more information about the registration process. If you are already registered, please login here.
Quoted
It will still cost you the same amount of tonnage Walter.
This post has been edited 1 times, last edit by "Rooijen10" (Sep 26th 2007, 11:31pm)
Quoted
Originally posted by Hrolf Hakonson
The latest proposal could also be combined with the idea of limiting how many tons can be applied to a hull by it's length. This might be useful in the case of the largest ships, and could be relaxed during wartime production.
Something like the previous proposal:
Amount of tonnage per month that can be applied to a hull is based on its length.
0 - 70 meters - 250 tons per month maximum
70.01 - 120 m - 500 tons per month maximum
120.01 - 170 m - 750 tons per month maximum
170.01 - 220 m - 1000 tons per month maximum
220.01 - 270 m - 1250 tons per month maximum
270.01 - 320 m - 1500 tons per month maximum
320.01 - 370 m - 1750 tons per month maximum
This post has been edited 2 times, last edit by "AdmKuznetsov" (Sep 27th 2007, 4:47pm)
Quoted
Originally posted by perdedor99
Quoted
Originally posted by Hrolf Hakonson
The latest proposal could also be combined with the idea of limiting how many tons can be applied to a hull by it's length. This might be useful in the case of the largest ships, and could be relaxed during wartime production.
Something like the previous proposal:
Amount of tonnage per month that can be applied to a hull is based on its length.
0 - 70 meters - 250 tons per month maximum
70.01 - 120 m - 500 tons per month maximum
120.01 - 170 m - 750 tons per month maximum
170.01 - 220 m - 1000 tons per month maximum
220.01 - 270 m - 1250 tons per month maximum
270.01 - 320 m - 1500 tons per month maximum
320.01 - 370 m - 1750 tons per month maximum
I still go for the other proposal. The other one was easier to keep track off.
Quoted
building a slip or dock for that monster would be very expensive!"
And expanding a port...
About 10 IP, and at least 2 years, I figure.
This post has been edited 1 times, last edit by "Rooijen10" (Sep 27th 2007, 8:49pm)
Quoted
Minimum construction time in months = Light tonnage of hull / 1000 + (10 - (Light tonnage of hull / 3000))
This has the following results:
1,600 ton DD - 11.1 months (vs 10.6 months currently)
9,000 ton CL - 16 months (vs 18 currently)
30,000 ton CV - 30 months (vs 39 currently)
45,000 ton BB - 40 months (vs 54 currently)
63,000 ton BB - 52 months (vs 72 currently)
Forum Software: Burning Board® Lite 2.1.2 pl 1, developed by WoltLab® GmbH