Dear visitor, welcome to WesWorld. If this is your first visit here, please read the Help. It explains in detail how this page works. To use all features of this page, you should consider registering. Please use the registration form, to register here or read more information about the registration process. If you are already registered, please login here.
This post has been edited 1 times, last edit by "Vukovlad" (Jul 6th 2011, 11:40pm)
Quoted
Originally posted by Vukovlad
I am helping ALVAMA with the Peruvian Air Force so i will be posting Requests for Proposals on his behalf.
The Peruvian Ministry of Defence is issuing the following requests for Proposals:
RfP 1941 Primary trainer.
Peru wishes to acquire a total of 40 primary trainers available for delivery no later than 31/12 1941.
Peru also requires a 30% offset deal
Quoted
Originally posted by Vukovlad
RfP 1941 Multi-engine trainer.
Peru wishes to acquire a total of 12 multi-engined trainers that are capable of both pilot and gunnery training available for delivery no later than 31/12 1941.
Peru also requires a 30% offset deal
Quoted
[SIZE=3]LKOD KOD-1[/SIZE]
[SIZE=3]Specifications:[/SIZE]
Length: 23.90 feet
Wingspan: 26.90 feet
Height: 8.20 feet
Weight: 1,364 pounds empty; 1,936 pounds loaded
Engine: de Havilland Gipsy Major 4-cylinder in-line, 125 hp
Crew: 1-2
[SIZE=3]Performance:[/SIZE]
Max Speed: 93.5 MPH
Cruise radius: 218 miles
Operational Ceiling: 10,673 feet
[SIZE=3]Armament:[/SIZE]
- Banana Peels are available if needed by the crew.
Notes: The Latvian Aisargi currently operates 8 LKOD KOD-1s, They serve as basic trainers for the Aisargi, cost 15,000 lats a piece, and have been sold on the civilian market as single and double seated aircraft.
Quoted
[SIZE=4]VEF I-17 Trainer[/SIZE]
[SIZE=3]Specifications:[/SIZE]
Length: 26.9 ft
Wingspan: 32.2 ft
Height: 9.5 ft
Wing area: 206.7 sq ft
Weight: 1,740 lb empty, 2,540 lb max takeoff
Crew: 2
Powerplant:1x C4 Menasco Pirate air-cooled radical , 125 hp maximum
[SIZE=3]Performance:[/SIZE]
Speed: 143 mph
Cruising Speed: 117.5 mph
Ceiling: 19,356 ft
Range: 368 mi
Remarks:
[SIZE=3]Armament:[/SIZE]
- The installation of our bamboo dart thrower is almost complete, sir!
Notes: The I-17 was considered as an alternative to the LKOD KOD-2B for the role of army cooperation; however, it was rejected due to lower armament, loiter performance, and crew facilities.
Quoted
[SIZE=4]VEF JDA-10M Utilty Aircraft[/SIZE]
[SIZE=3]Specifications:[/SIZE]
Length: 29.5 ft
Wingspan: 40.7 ft
Height: 10.8 ft
Wing area: 258.3 sq ft
Weight: 3,705 lb empty, 6,170 lb max takeoff
Crew: 2
Powerplant: 2× Armstrong Siddeley Cheetah IX air-cooled radials , 350 hp maximum, 700 hp total
[SIZE=3]Performance:[/SIZE]
Speed: 217.5 mph
Cruising Speed: 174 mph
Ceiling: 22,309 ft
Range: 348 mi
Remarks: In place of armament, can carry 4 passangers
[SIZE=3]Armament:[/SIZE]
- 2 × 303'' machine guns in wings
- 1 x .303'' machine gun in nose
- 661 lb of bombs
Notes: The VEF JDA-10M, designed by John Akerman, is perhaps one of the most versatile aircraft in use by the Latvian Air Force. It serves as a light passanger transport, as well as a communications aircraft, a light bomber, and a training aircraft. An unarmed version of this aircraft is also available on the civilian market.
This post has been edited 3 times, last edit by "TexanCowboy" (Jul 7th 2011, 4:42am)
Quoted
Originally posted by ShinRa_Inc
While Canada has no official government postion on the matter, and manufacturers have several planes to offer, the unpredented demand for subsidized offests at the expense of Canadian industry is not a matter which the government, or the individual manufacturers wish to be a party of.
This post has been edited 1 times, last edit by "Vukovlad" (Jul 7th 2011, 12:06pm)
Quoted
Originally posted by Hood
Great Britain too refrains from offering any products due to the mandatory offsets required. The Government shall not comit British firms to any mandatory offset arrangement in connection with the sale of armaments or services for foreign governments.
OOC:
Has Peru got much aeronautical industry worthy of investment by the big firms of Europe and N America?
Quoted
Originally posted by Vukovlad
Just curious where does it state that the offset agreement has to be in the form of direct investments in the aircraft industry.
For people that have declared this and that as economic impossibilities in WW I am very surprised that the concept of offset deals are beyond their grasp. I suggest you read the link brock posted.
Quoted
Originally posted by Vukovlad
For people that have declared this and that as economic impossibilities in WW I am very surprised that the concept of offset deals are beyond their grasp. I suggest you read the link brock posted.
Forum Software: Burning Board® Lite 2.1.2 pl 1, developed by WoltLab® GmbH