Dear visitor, welcome to WesWorld. If this is your first visit here, please read the Help. It explains in detail how this page works. To use all features of this page, you should consider registering. Please use the registration form, to register here or read more information about the registration process. If you are already registered, please login here.
Quoted
Originally posted by Rooijen10
IC: Japan disagrees with the Atlanteans. The fact that there are British soldiers burried in France and Belgium does not mean that those nations should become British just because the British have their dead burried there.
Quoted
Originally posted by Rooijen10Chile has no business on the West side of the Pacific. The only legitimate claims on the Paracel Islands are those of China and Indochina (and not Vietnam). In our eyes, the best solution is to split the island group in two and hand one half over to China and the other half over to Indochina. The exact division to be determined by the members of the League of Nations. That way, everybody's happy about the fate of a bunch of rocks sticking above the water.
This post has been edited 1 times, last edit by "Marek Gutkowski" (Feb 2nd 2010, 2:47am)
Quoted
I'd suggest you stop handwaving around your unibrow virus as a distraction, stop glossing over the facts, and pay attention to the actual debate, here.
Quoted
The VERY obvious diference being only the Chilean being buried on the Paracels and no Chinese nor Veitnamese, so your comparison is an epic fail.....
Quoted
Sadly, Japan doesn't get to make that decision on their own and if they don't like it they, and their silly unibrow virus nonsence, can quite frankly sod off.
...and as long as the Chinese and their Japanese cheerleading squad wish to exclude the Indochinese claim due to French involvement the Paracels, they will remain as a mandate not in the hands of either party.
Quoted
Canada's been looking for a quaint, out-of-the-way place to test large amounts of new explosives.
This post has been edited 2 times, last edit by "Rooijen10" (Feb 2nd 2010, 7:58pm)
Quoted
Originally posted by Rooijen10
Quoted
I'd suggest you stop handwaving around your unibrow virus as a distraction, stop glossing over the facts, and pay attention to the actual debate, here.
Correct me if I am wrong but the actual debate here is about the Paracels and not the Spratleys and I gave a suggestion that is fair to both sides to which you could easily have given a proper reply with your opinion. I am paying attention to the actual debate yet you completely ignored my suggestion.
Quoted
Originally posted by Rooijen10
Regarding the claims, part you use is historical and the 1930 Chinese bit I could not find because "Spratley" was spelled without the 'e' (since you found that Chinese bit, you could have pointed it out in the Chinese thread that I obviously failed to find that bit... which you didn't do).
Quoted
Originally posted by Rooijen10
Now France/Indochina never disputed the Filipino 1924 claim on the Spratleys. So either the claim never existed or they no longer care about the claim and consider the mainland more important than the Spratleys (though most likely Adm. K never knew about the existence of the claim).
Quoted
Originally posted by Rooijen10
The Chileans had absolutely no business on the other side of the ocean.
Quoted
I'm still considering your suggestion. Personally, I'd like the debate to Just Go Away and so I'd prefer the Polish suggestion from sheer orneriness.
Quoted
I was under the impression they were making port calls, but that might be wrong. I'll have to go back and look.
Quoted
Originally posted by Rooijen10
Quoted
I'm still considering your suggestion. Personally, I'd like the debate to Just Go Away and so I'd prefer the Polish suggestion from sheer orneriness.
I'm all in favor of unleashing Canadian Super Science on those islands and see what happens.
Quoted
Originally posted by Rooijen10
*whispering* Wes, it's 'Vietnamese' not 'Veitnamese' and at this point in time, it's Indochina and not Vietnam
Yes, I love to compare apples with oranges.
The British had something they needed to do in France (help out an ally). The Chileans had absolutely no business on the other side of the ocean (pot... kettle... I know, but it's ShinRa's/Canada's job to mention that to me/Japan, right? ). The least they could have done was to take the stiff ... *ahem* deceased home and bury him there where he belongs rather than to stuff the poor bastard into the ground of some God forsaken island.
First of all, just because you're Canadian does not mean you're allowed to steal Shinra's job to have his Canadians tell the Japanese to Sod off.
Secondly, reading your reply, I'm not sure if you read my bit correctly. It was Japan's belief that the best solution (after the "blowing up the islands" solution of Poland) is to split the island group in two between China and Indochina so I am not excluding Indochina's claim. Also the exact division is to be determined by the members of the League of Nations and at no point did I say that Japan is going to make that decision.
... so rather than trying to ignore me and my ideas (as usual), I would like to know what you/Atlantis (as well as the other members of the LoN) think (either IC or OOC) of that idea and, if it is a good suggestion, what the fairest way is to split up the islands.
Quoted
Now, onto your idea, in short no, I don't agree with spliting it up, frankly at this point I am with those who feel the Island should be blown to smitherines.
Quoted
It was Japan's belief that the best solution (after the "blowing up the islands" solution of Poland) is to split the island group in two between China and Indochina
Quoted
At least then we would know that even if someone decided to post more troops, planes and ships on the Islands then there is actual square footage to acomidate them, it wouldn't happen, because the island isn't there.
Quoted
Yes, but I would not be surprised if someone were to tie a bunch of ships together and use that to replace those islands so they can still post more troops, planes and ships there... There is a certain person here (and I won't mention Desertfox's name) who's devious enough to do something like that.
Forum Software: Burning Board® Lite 2.1.2 pl 1, developed by WoltLab® GmbH