Dear visitor, welcome to WesWorld. If this is your first visit here, please read the Help. It explains in detail how this page works. To use all features of this page, you should consider registering. Please use the registration form, to register here or read more information about the registration process. If you are already registered, please login here.
Quoted
Originally posted by HoOmAn
One last word about ships being "disposable" for story reasons - this is too easy. If you´re only willing to loose the old and worn out you will not be able to set up interesting stories. Why shouldn´t a navy use its most modern and most capable units to great extend when those units are those most likely to cause harm to the enemy? So you´ve got to risk them, meaning you can loose them. It will also be too predictable for readers to be really interesting, IMHO. So for good story reasons you should probably not think about what is "disposable" but what asset makes for an interesting read.
Quoted
Originally posted by Hrolf Hakonson
One question I have is the use of 1000 pound bombs. Aren't we a bit early for those off most single-engined dive bombers? The Aichi D3A carried a 250 kg bomb, the (brand new in WW 1937) Douglas SDB can carry them but at a cost in range, the same is true for the Ju-87, etc. 500 pounders are more period….
Quoted
Originally posted by parador
The Nanchan N1-D1-A1 could carry up to 900lbs (400kg). But may be i'm wrong, because you mean it's a problem for a carrier based aircraft (the N1-D1-A1 is a landbased dive bomber).
Quoted
Originally posted by parador
As i thought he thought about a carrierbased dive bomber
Quoted
Originally posted by Vukovlad
Must be me but I dont see what was wrong with his actions... Starting a war with Argentina probably isn´t in the best interest of Peru.
Forum Software: Burning Board® Lite 2.1.2 pl 1, developed by WoltLab® GmbH