Dear visitor, welcome to WesWorld. If this is your first visit here, please read the Help. It explains in detail how this page works. To use all features of this page, you should consider registering. Please use the registration form, to register here or read more information about the registration process. If you are already registered, please login here.
This post has been edited 1 times, last edit by "Kaiser Kirk" (Feb 29th 2008, 5:39pm)
This post has been edited 1 times, last edit by "perdedor99" (Feb 29th 2008, 5:42pm)
Quoted
Originally posted by Brockpaine
Bulgaria believes this is a matter for somebody else to decide and the Bulgarian representative goes home for a week to consult with the government.
This post has been edited 1 times, last edit by "Kaiser Kirk" (Feb 29th 2008, 6:40pm)
Quoted
Originally posted by Kaiser Kirk
Is there a clause in the Indochina Protocol that allows you to recognize French authority except when you do not care to?
Quoted
Originally posted by Kaiser Kirk
So, under some unique legal theory, Bharat and China, and apparently Romania, do not recognize the 1884 treaty between the sovereign states of France and Vietnam, authorizing France to conduct affairs, to be valid or binding for some reason.
Quoted
Originally posted by perdedor99
The Indian envoy just smiled at the Atlantean response and his thoughts were that the Dutch and FAR were in the same bed. "Like thieves on the night. Trying to further expand their empires with subterfuges. We'll let see what they say."
This post has been edited 2 times, last edit by "TheCanadian" (Feb 29th 2008, 8:31pm)
Quoted
Originally posted by Kaiser Kirk
Frank Reuter, Netherlands LON Delegate :
Once again my colleague from Bharat stoops to name calling instead of presenting his case in a sensible manner.
The creation of the Mandate was hardly a Dutch idea in the first place. Awarding the islands to the custody of Iberia as a formal Mandate seemed a reasonable solution at the time. As you may recall, the Chinese Civil War was still raging and there was not a unified government there to defend their territories and present their case.
The Netherlands absorbed a large number of refugees (1) from that conflict, quickly recognized the current Chinese government and have maintained good relations since.
Now, as for "expanding the French Empire". Either the islands are Chinese by ancient claim and right, or they are Indochinese, regardless of who has custody of Indochinese policy.
There is no reason not to bring the case to the Court to bring this matter to a close within the next couple of years after the Court has researched and advised.
(1) As historical and discussed with Ubiwan.
Quoted
Originally posted by perdedor99
The Indian envoy just smiled at the Atlantean response and his thoughts were that the Dutch and FAR were in the same bed. "Like thieves on the night. Trying to further expand their empires with subterfuges. We'll let see what they say."
OOC : Heh, you can think what you want, but you would happen to be wrong
Also, since China brought this when Lithuania was settled, it would be mid-August, prior to SAER, or any of the Sept events.
Lastly, how the heck does advocating France waive the claim in China's favor expand the Dutch Empire???
Forum Software: Burning Board® Lite 2.1.2 pl 1, developed by WoltLab® GmbH