Dear visitor, welcome to WesWorld. If this is your first visit here, please read the Help. It explains in detail how this page works. To use all features of this page, you should consider registering. Please use the registration form, to register here or read more information about the registration process. If you are already registered, please login here.
Quoted
Each member bumbles around following it's own policies at every other members expense while no-one is accountable at all.
Quoted
Satsuma is rotten to the core and no wonder its structure falls apart so easily when proper, clear-sighted offers are presented.
Quoted
Japan laments the actions of China and Persia but cannot act, it is powerless to control it's members who may drag it into war.
Quoted
The British Foreign Office is getting a lot of complaints and petitions from Pro-Pakistani groups and Pakstani exiles, led by Mr Mohammed Ali Jinnah pointing out that the obvious fact that with Persia nullifying the Karachi agreement, Pakistan would legally revert to it's former status (as British territory).
Quoted
Originally posted by Rooijen10
... so what did Japan do at the expense of the other SATSUMA members?
Quoted
Originally posted by Rooijen10
There is of course an obvious side effect to it. When SATSUMA farts the smell with be so vile and disgusting that no mortal can stand it, even with protective masks on. With this foul smell, SAER will be destroyed.
Quoted
Originally posted by Rooijen10
Powerless to control or unwilling to control or perhaps being the one controlled by others thus unable to control?
Quoted
Originally posted by Rooijen10
Ending an agreement (what Persia did) and nullifying an agreement are two different things... and this 'obvious fact' is anything but obvious. Just look at the text.
Quoted
Originally posted by Rooijen10
*Sends Mr Mohammed Ali Jinnah on holiday to Ioutou*
This post has been edited 1 times, last edit by "parador" (Jun 9th 2009, 6:31pm)
This post has been edited 1 times, last edit by "perdedor99" (Jun 9th 2009, 6:47pm)
Quoted
Originally posted by parador
We have now two different opinions. On one side there is GB, who means the agreement is nullified, if Persia left it. On the other side, there is Persia, who has said if i end the agreement, the status quo has to be in place, because it was an agreement without conditions. So the whole case is a case for the LoN !
... a detailed statement will follow ...
Quoted
There are two choices regarding Pakistan. First, abandon Pakistan and be seen as having made a grevious diplomatic error in trusting India and Persia and seriously harm the security of the Empire, or, secondly, in some way reassert British right of determination in that region due to Persia's abrogation of the Karachi agreements. We have chosen the second for the sole purpose of giving Mr. Jinnah his Muslim republic with peripherary obligations to the Commonwealth.
Quoted
Originally posted by Vukovlad
There are other options but until Canada and the UK news catches up I will refrain to post the option choosen by Persia.
This post has been edited 1 times, last edit by "AdmKuznetsov" (Jun 10th 2009, 12:32pm)
This post has been edited 1 times, last edit by "perdedor99" (Jun 10th 2009, 7:32pm)
This post has been edited 1 times, last edit by "perdedor99" (Jun 16th 2009, 8:04pm)
Forum Software: Burning Board® Lite 2.1.2 pl 1, developed by WoltLab® GmbH