Dear visitor, welcome to WesWorld. If this is your first visit here, please read the Help. It explains in detail how this page works. To use all features of this page, you should consider registering. Please use the registration form, to register here or read more information about the registration process. If you are already registered, please login here.
Quoted
Between the two Fuso options offered, the Metacentric height lowered, gun survivability goes up marginally, torpedo survivability goes down, steadiness goes up marginally, seakpeeing marginally up.
Quoted
To be honest it seems like a lot of trouble for 30 year old designs. I've run into similar cases when I look at my older ships. Should I give them a major refit, just a minor refit to extend their life a bit or scrap them and build a new design using the old guns?
Quoted
I just asked for Details on the rockets (we have no rules here but I found your approach valid and easy to understand)
Quoted
I asked if an intentional modification of a designs mid break would require a 75% rebuild (it is not really stated in our rules).
Quoted
Note here that I did not cirtizise design changes that come with the step from SS1 to SS2 and the use of new tool features but an intentional modification to a design in order to correct something that you do not like today but that is not a design flaw that renders the original design invalid. I think there is a difference here. You may disagree.
Quoted
Of course you are right that I my own designs have to be challanged against my own words. It's been years ago and I can't remember any details but I think I never deliberately/intentionally modified my designs to make them better other than increasing their capabilities by a rebuild.
Quoted
Was I wrong? Dunno. I was never challanged on this for many years. Feel free to do it now. It's been 6 years of real life but if I made a mistake I/we need to decide if I have to redcon my designs.
Quoted
The closest thing I see in our rules appears to be the 25% "Changes to superstructure (i.e. lengthening or widening a deck...)" Granted, it's talking about superstructure rather than changes to the hull, but a 25% rebuild feels to me to be about the right price for the level of work being done.
Quoted
...you forgot the gills!!!
Quoted
I also feel I need to mention that any designs that I've refitted have been re simed in the latest version of Springstyle as built, prior to me making any alterations to the design.
That means every stat is meticulously recreated as close as I possibly can to the original design, even if flawed.
Quoted
I would assume others would be doing the same.
Quoted
Some of those designs have been resimmed from Springstyle along time ago and again with Springsharp 2 once I needed to refit them.
Quoted
I personally want to use a program that's not missing anything
Quoted
again we allow it so there is no issue there.
Forum Software: Burning Board® Lite 2.1.2 pl 1, developed by WoltLab® GmbH