WesWorld

Peru, Q3/1940

A. Industrial Allocation

4/4 Factories to Naval Materials: +4,000 t
0/4 Factories to Infrastructure: +0.0 IP
Stockpile: 1,263 t
Scrap: +0 t
Total Available Tonnage: 5,263 t
Total Tonnage Used: 5,146 t
Surplus to Next Quarter: 117 t

B. Infrastructure Development

Nothing.

C. Trade and Commerce

To Germany: 1,600 t + 789 t for construction of CL Ancash (laid down this quarter)

D. Naval Construction and Maintenance

At Callao

S2.5A:
S2A: DD Capitan Carvajal receives 510 t, launched, to complete Q1/41
S1A:
S1B: DD Iquitos receives 300 t, launched, to complete Q1/41
S0A:
S0B:
S0C:
D3A:
D1A:
D1A: DD Torbellino begins refit, receives 271 t, completed
Free floating: DD Republica receives 650 t, to complete Q4/40
Free-floating: DD Captain Aquirre receives 339 t, completed
Free-floating: DD Puno receives 87 t, completed
Free-floating: SS P-5 receives 300 t, to complete Q4/40

At Mollendo:

S0A: AM A-1 laid down, receives 300 t, launched
S0B:
S0C:
S0D:
D0A:

E. Other Notes

Chile is a poopyhead.

F. Order of Battle, End of Quarter

--Completed (Under Repair/Refit) + Under Construction

Battleships (BB): 3(0) + 0
Heavy/Armored Cruisers (CA): 2(0) + 0
Light Cruisers (CL): 6(0) + 1
Destroyers (DD): 26(0) + 3
Submarines (SS): 7(0) + 1
Minesweepers (AM): 3(0) + 1
Submarine Chasers (SC): 6(0) + 0

Notes:

-Encyclopedia listings for Peruvian destroyers are faulty - the lay down dates reflect pre-civil war plans and not reality. I will get to that.

-Sub count in previous reports seems to be off. I count nine operational boats.

-Peru's reported surplus from 2/40 did not add up with actual expenditures. I've used the actual expenditures (about 250 t less) to determine the surplus (thus about 250 t more).

Quoted

Originally posted by The Rock Doctor
E. Other Notes
Chile is a poopyhead.

Quoted

Originally posted by The Rock Doctor
-Sub count in previous reports seems to be off. I count nine operational boats.

FYI, I believe that after the war the replacement submarines were given the same name as the two subs sunk in the conflict. Is that what you're referring to?

Quoted

Originally posted by Brockpaine

Quoted

Originally posted by The Rock Doctor
-Sub count in previous reports seems to be off. I count nine operational boats.

FYI, I believe that after the war the replacement submarines were given the same name as the two subs sunk in the conflict. Is that what you're referring to?

Jeez, I hope not. I was just counting total boats, less losses.

Better go look again.

Well, I just checked my notes again and it looks like I'm wrong. The boats were replaced but given the next number in the sequence.

On further reading of old sim reports:

P-1, 2, and 4 are good
P-3 got sunk.

SC-1 got sunk
SC-2-5 are good
SC-6-7 were planned but not built.

So there are seven operational boats, and an eighth on the ways.

Edit:

-Okay, I've cleaned up the destroyer, submarine, and sub chaser threads, and deleted redundant threads for those categories.

-Still need to clean up the cruiser threads.

-There's a new coastal minesweeper design started in this quarter. I did a sim in SS3, and will redo it in SS2 for your viewing pleasure in the next day or two.

There was always a bit of a mess in Peru, particularly in the '36 and '37 period, due to the way Howard robbed Peru of money to launder to himself. I sorted it all out comprehensively at one point, but I lost a lot of my notes on my keydrive a few months ago; my Peru notes among them.

Quoted

Originally posted by The Rock Doctor
-Peru's reported surplus from 2/40 did not add up with actual expenditures. I've used the actual expenditures (about 250 t less) to determine the surplus (thus about 250 t more).

I've gone back and looked at the past sim reports, and I'm not sure that's right. The Excel spreadsheet I sent you seems to have left some stuff out that was in the Q1 and Q2 reports, and the Q1/1940 seems to have had a typo. I fixed everything to align with the expenditures of the old reports, but the surplus is different.

Double-checking now.

Here's the numbers from the past sim reports. It appears there was some sort of error on the Q1/1940 report, which would be a definite my bad if true. I checked all the numbers twice just to make sure, but here's what I've found.

Quoted

Q1/1940
Production: 4,000 tons from factories + 800 tons from transactions + 477 tons from surplus = 5277 tons total.

Expenditures:
- 1493 tons to Germany for CL Quito
- 650 tons for DDL Confederación
- 650 tons for DDL Republica
- 510 tons for DD Capitan Aguierre
- 510 tons for DD Capitan Carvajal
- 300 tons for DD Puno
- 271 tons for DD Terror (refit)
- 300 tons for SS P-5
Total Expenditures: 4684 tons

Total: 5277 tons - 4684 tons = 593 tons surplus for Q2

Quoted

Q2/1940
Production: 4,000 tons from factories + 593 tons from surplus = 4593 tons total.

Expenditures:
- 489 tons for DDL Confederación
- 650 tons for DDL Republica
- 510 tons for DD Capitan Aguierre
- 510 tons for DD Capitan Carvajal
- 300 tons for DD Puno
- 300 tons for DD Iquitos
- 271 tons for DD Terrible (refit)
- 300 tons for SS P-5
Total Expenditures: 3330 tons

Total: 4593 tons - 3330 tons = 1263 tons surplus for Q3

Alright, I'll amend it.

Probably means I'll wink the minesweeper away. Or not - looks like it just fits in the budget after all.

Ah, sorry...