Frankly, given the past history of Wesworld naval treaty talks, what has already been laid on the table out of character would be a far greater accomplishment; it may be unwise to set expectations too high. Otherwise such high expectations might drive away, or keep away, participants.
Also, if all the world powers do attend then its to be expected that we all have to give up something, its not going to be a case of the current proposals of modest cuts or half-decade holidays.
The sole reason the Cleito treaty existed was because of an OOC decision that some form of limitation treaty would form the framework for starting this sim. It's become somewhat obvious that without an OOC decision that some form of comprehensive treaty is wanted for the sim moving forward, that one will not be agreed on.I am not entirely clear what you mean by this; could you elaborate?
I think however the real question is what we want to see OOC for the sim rather than whatever IC views we have.
Forum Software: Burning Board® Lite 2.1.2 pl 1, developed by WoltLab® GmbH