You are not logged in.

21

Tuesday, February 28th 2012, 5:19am

This third tanker design, Meteorite, would seem to my mind to be what the INS would need to keep escort groups resupplied and on station - adequate fuel stores (which I presume are simmed as additional bunkers), decent provision for RAS gear and space for dry stores and munitions. Cost wise it's economical.

I like it.

22

Tuesday, February 28th 2012, 9:06pm

I'm still concerned that the Meteorite design is a bit too small for the North Atlantic and the needs of a destroyer squadron... though I'm perhaps reconsidering that.

Here's a patrol ship designed to take up the ocean patrol ship role.

Quoted

[SIZE=3]Maeve, Irish Ocean Patrol Ship laid down 1942[/SIZE]

Displacement:
1,370 t light; 1,428 t standard; 2,194 t normal; 2,806 t full load

Dimensions: Length overall / water x beam x draught
244.88 ft / 238.00 ft x 34.50 ft x 18.70 ft (normal load)
74.64 m / 72.54 m x 10.52 m x 5.70 m

Armament:
2 - 3.70" / 94.0 mm guns in single mounts, 25.33lbs / 11.49kg shells, 1942 Model
Dual purpose guns in deck mounts with hoists
on centreline, all forward, 1 raised mount
2 - 1.57" / 40.0 mm guns (1x2 guns), 1.95lbs / 0.89kg shells, 1942 Model
Anti-aircraft guns in deck mount
on centreline aft
Weight of broadside 55 lbs / 25 kg
Shells per gun, main battery: 450

Armour:
- Gun armour: Face (max) Other gunhouse (avg) Barbette/hoist (max)
Main: 2.00" / 51 mm 1.00" / 25 mm 1.00" / 25 mm
2nd: 1.00" / 25 mm - -

- Conning tower: 1.00" / 25 mm

Machinery:
Oil fired boilers, complex reciprocating steam engines,
Geared drive, 2 shafts, 4,986 ihp / 3,720 Kw = 18.00 kts
Range 7,000nm at 18.00 kts
Bunker at max displacement = 1,378 tons

Complement:
159 - 208

Cost:
£0.585 million / $2.339 million

Distribution of weights at normal displacement:
Armament: 7 tons, 0.3 %
Armour: 12 tons, 0.5 %
- Belts: 0 tons, 0.0 %
- Torpedo bulkhead: 0 tons, 0.0 %
- Armament: 8 tons, 0.4 %
- Armour Deck: 0 tons, 0.0 %
- Conning Tower: 4 tons, 0.2 %
Machinery: 273 tons, 12.4 %
Hull, fittings & equipment: 728 tons, 33.2 %
Fuel, ammunition & stores: 823 tons, 37.5 %
Miscellaneous weights: 350 tons, 16.0 %

Overall survivability and seakeeping ability:
Survivability (Non-critical penetrating hits needed to sink ship):
3,823 lbs / 1,734 Kg = 151.0 x 3.7 " / 94 mm shells or 1.3 torpedoes
Stability (Unstable if below 1.00): 1.09
Metacentric height 1.2 ft / 0.4 m
Roll period: 13.3 seconds
Steadiness - As gun platform (Average = 50 %): 72 %
- Recoil effect (Restricted arc if above 1.00): 0.11
Seaboat quality (Average = 1.00): 2.00

Hull form characteristics:
Hull has rise forward of midbreak
Block coefficient: 0.500
Length to Beam Ratio: 6.90 : 1
'Natural speed' for length: 15.43 kts
Power going to wave formation at top speed: 55 %
Trim (Max stability = 0, Max steadiness = 100): 36
Bow angle (Positive = bow angles forward): 10.00 degrees
Stern overhang: 3.00 ft / 0.91 m
Freeboard (% = measuring location as a percentage of overall length):
- Stem: 22.00 ft / 6.71 m
- Forecastle (20 %): 20.00 ft / 6.10 m
- Mid (55 %): 18.00 ft / 5.49 m (10.00 ft / 3.05 m aft of break)
- Quarterdeck (15 %): 10.00 ft / 3.05 m
- Stern: 10.00 ft / 3.05 m
- Average freeboard: 15.31 ft / 4.67 m

Ship space, strength and comments:
Space - Hull below water (magazines/engines, low = better): 61.6 %
- Above water (accommodation/working, high = better): 97.3 %
Waterplane Area: 5,471 Square feet or 508 Square metres
Displacement factor (Displacement / loading): 228 %
Structure weight / hull surface area: 61 lbs/sq ft or 297 Kg/sq metre
Hull strength (Relative):
- Cross-sectional: 1.01
- Longitudinal: 7.56
- Overall: 1.23
Hull space for machinery, storage, compartmentation is excellent
Room for accommodation and workspaces is adequate
Ship has slow, easy roll, a good, steady gun platform
Excellent seaboat, comfortable, can fire her guns in the heaviest weather

23

Tuesday, February 28th 2012, 9:30pm

I'd say that this design is spot on for the intended role. She's an excellent seaboat, with a good reserve of strength to take pounding in the North Atlantic. Her armament is adequate for the AS role and is not too bad for AA defense. I'm presuming that the misc weight allowance would have a good sensor suite and AS armament outfit.

She seems very much like the OTL Loch/Bay class frigates of the late war period, only better constructed perhaps.

24

Tuesday, February 28th 2012, 9:36pm

Quoted

Originally posted by BruceDuncan
I'd say that this design is spot on for the intended role. She's an excellent seaboat, with a good reserve of strength to take pounding in the North Atlantic. Her armament is adequate for the AS role and is not too bad for AA defense. I'm presuming that the misc weight allowance would have a good sensor suite and AS armament outfit.

Yes, that's the idea. Part of the miscellaneous weight's also to account for some dedicated equipment for towing ships or salvaging things.