You are not logged in.

Dear visitor, welcome to WesWorld. If this is your first visit here, please read the Help. It explains in detail how this page works. To use all features of this page, you should consider registering. Please use the registration form, to register here or read more information about the registration process. If you are already registered, please login here.

1

Saturday, May 28th 2011, 9:21pm

Senegal Oopsie

Back when I designed the Senegal-class CLs for France, it seems I made an oopsie which I just caught today. The main battery lacks the superfiring B and C turrets that should have carried over from the preceding Nouvelle-Calédonie and Algerie classes (as the Senegals are just a modernization of those vessels).

I propose to fix the ships with the following sim. The only changes are making two of the four 152mm turrets superfiring, and compensating for the loss of hull strength by raising the block coefficient slightly. This results in a ship which is 208 tons heavier than the previous sim, and I will pay that extra tonnage in the Q1/1941 report. (I don't really feel like re-writing all of the sim reports to account for the error, but if that's what I need to do...)

Quoted

Senegal, French Cruiser laid down 1937

Displacement:
10,175 t light; 10,600 t standard; 12,244 t normal; 13,559 t full load

Dimensions: Length overall / water x beam x draught
649.14 ft / 636.48 ft x 56.76 ft (Bulges 63.98 ft) x 23.13 ft (normal load)
197.86 m / 194.00 m x 17.30 m (Bulges 19.50 m) x 7.05 m

Armament:
12 - 5.98" / 152 mm guns (4x3 guns), 110.23lbs / 50.00kg shells, 1937 Model
Breech loading guns in turrets (on barbettes)
on centreline ends, evenly spread, 2 raised mounts - superfiring
2 - 3.94" / 100 mm guns (1x2 guns), 30.51lbs / 13.84kg shells, 1937 Model
Dual purpose guns in a deck mount with hoist
on side amidships, all raised guns
8 - 3.94" / 100 mm guns (4x2 guns), 35.27lbs / 16.00kg shells, 1937 Model
Dual purpose guns in deck mounts with hoists
on side, evenly spread
16 - 1.57" / 40.0 mm guns (4x4 guns), 1.95lbs / 0.88kg shells, 1937 Model
Breech loading guns in deck mounts
on side, evenly spread
Weight of broadside 1,697 lbs / 770 kg
Shells per gun, main battery: 180
12 - 21.7" / 550 mm above water torpedoes

Armour:
- Belts: Width (max) Length (avg) Height (avg)
Main: 5.12" / 130 mm 377.30 ft / 115.00 m 9.84 ft / 3.00 m
Ends: 0.98" / 25 mm 259.19 ft / 79.00 m 9.84 ft / 3.00 m
Upper: 0.98" / 25 mm 377.30 ft / 115.00 m 9.84 ft / 3.00 m
Main Belt covers 91 % of normal length

- Gun armour: Face (max) Other gunhouse (avg) Barbette/hoist (max)
Main: 5.12" / 130 mm 2.76" / 70 mm 3.35" / 85 mm
2nd: 0.98" / 25 mm 0.20" / 5 mm -
3rd: 0.98" / 25 mm 0.20" / 5 mm -
4th: 0.98" / 25 mm 0.20" / 5 mm -

- Armour deck: 2.17" / 55 mm, Conning tower: 4.33" / 110 mm

Machinery:
Oil fired boilers, steam turbines,
Geared drive, 4 shafts, 100,429 shp / 74,920 Kw = 34.00 kts
Range 2,400nm at 30.00 kts
Bunker at max displacement = 2,959 tons

Complement:
581 - 756

Cost:
£4.997 million / $19.989 million

Distribution of weights at normal displacement:
Armament: 203 tons, 1.7 %
Armour: 2,414 tons, 19.7 %
- Belts: 1,037 tons, 8.5 %
- Torpedo bulkhead: 0 tons, 0.0 %
- Armament: 364 tons, 3.0 %
- Armour Deck: 963 tons, 7.9 %
- Conning Tower: 50 tons, 0.4 %
Machinery: 2,784 tons, 22.7 %
Hull, fittings & equipment: 4,625 tons, 37.8 %
Fuel, ammunition & stores: 2,069 tons, 16.9 %
Miscellaneous weights: 150 tons, 1.2 %

Overall survivability and seakeeping ability:
Survivability (Non-critical penetrating hits needed to sink ship):
15,037 lbs / 6,821 Kg = 140.3 x 6.0 " / 152 mm shells or 1.9 torpedoes
Stability (Unstable if below 1.00): 1.11
Metacentric height 2.6 ft / 0.8 m
Roll period: 16.7 seconds
Steadiness - As gun platform (Average = 50 %): 70 %
- Recoil effect (Restricted arc if above 1.00): 0.40
Seaboat quality (Average = 1.00): 1.15

Hull form characteristics:
Hull has rise forward of midbreak
and transom stern
Block coefficient: 0.455
Length to Beam Ratio: 9.95 : 1
'Natural speed' for length: 28.96 kts
Power going to wave formation at top speed: 56 %
Trim (Max stability = 0, Max steadiness = 100): 61
Bow angle (Positive = bow angles forward): 20.00 degrees
Stern overhang: 0.00 ft / 0.00 m
Freeboard (% = measuring location as a percentage of overall length):
- Stem: 34.78 ft / 10.60 m
- Forecastle (20 %): 24.44 ft / 7.45 m
- Mid (50 %): 24.44 ft / 7.45 m (14.60 ft / 4.45 m aft of break)
- Quarterdeck (15 %): 14.60 ft / 4.45 m
- Stern: 16.40 ft / 5.00 m
- Average freeboard: 20.48 ft / 6.24 m

Ship space, strength and comments:
Space - Hull below water (magazines/engines, low = better): 88.8 %
- Above water (accommodation/working, high = better): 114.1 %
Waterplane Area: 24,038 Square feet or 2,233 Square metres
Displacement factor (Displacement / loading): 126 %
Structure weight / hull surface area: 108 lbs/sq ft or 528 Kg/sq metre
Hull strength (Relative):
- Cross-sectional: 0.96
- Longitudinal: 1.44
- Overall: 1.00
Hull space for machinery, storage, compartmentation is adequate
Room for accommodation and workspaces is adequate
Ship has slow, easy roll, a good, steady gun platform


Any objections?

2

Sunday, May 29th 2011, 7:49am

I'd think the new SS file is fine and pay the extra tonnage as you say. Might make for a good IC story.

3

Sunday, May 29th 2011, 7:50am

Quoted

Originally posted by thesmilingassassin
I'd think the new SS file is fine and pay the extra tonnage as you say. Might make for a good IC story.

IC: "We forgot to add two of the turrets, but we remembered now!"

Kaiser Kirk

Lightbringer and former European Imperialist

  • Send private message

4

Sunday, May 29th 2011, 6:11pm

Quoted

Originally posted by thesmilingassassin
I'd think the new SS file is fine and pay the extra tonnage as you say. Might make for a good IC story.


Well SA's a mod, but I'm not sure if that's his mod voice or not.

In my opinion...these have been at sea 2 years, they are not building on the ways, not something 'in development'.

Story is they are a pushed design, the French were trying to squeeze maximum out of the hull, decided to forgo superfiring. BC is dinky, short belt, speed is high, desired good seakeeping, so they cut out barbette armor and enhanced stability. There have been odder decisions made in naval design.


Not wedded to it, but thats my 2 cents.

5

Sunday, May 29th 2011, 6:57pm

Quoted

Originally posted by Kaiser Kirk
In my opinion...these have been at sea 2 years, they are not building on the ways, not something 'in development'.

Story is they are a pushed design, the French were trying to squeeze maximum out of the hull, decided to forgo superfiring. BC is dinky, short belt, speed is high, desired good seakeeping, so they cut out barbette armor and enhanced stability. There have been odder decisions made in naval design.


Not wedded to it, but thats my 2 cents.

Leaving them as-is, with no superfiring main battery guns, isn't on my list of acceptable options. It's an error and I will correct it; the question I pose is just how I shall do so.

Kaiser Kirk

Lightbringer and former European Imperialist

  • Send private message

6

Sunday, May 29th 2011, 7:25pm

The other way we've tended to go with 'fixing' ships is redoing them to the same light disp.

Redesigning ships well after they are in service just doesn't sit well. Designs posted are unofficial. Designs building get some flex, designs completed..are done.

There are vessels in my OOB dating from RAM's time which I consider to have mistakes - so not even my designs, that I'd like to go back and tinker with- not an option.

Anyhow, I've had my say, and others may just shrug and say, hey it's an honest error- and I get that. I appreciate you asking how to deal with it rather than just announcing on your next sim that you found an issue and were assigning tonnage to pay for it.

7

Sunday, May 29th 2011, 8:05pm

Quoted

Originally posted by Kaiser Kirk
There are vessels in my OOB dating from RAM's time which I consider to have mistakes - so not even my designs, that I'd like to go back and tinker with- not an option.

In the past, we've permitted players to fix honest mistakes - sometimes years after the ship's completion - particularly but not limited to the case of rules violations. But there needs to be a provable mistake. For instance, just in my recent memory, we've permitted adjustments of freeboard, correction of battery placement, and removal of a turret to fix a hull strength issue.

My general preference would be to deal with the fixes in a rebuild, but this particular error can't really be handled effectively in that way.

8

Sunday, May 29th 2011, 10:07pm

I'm of mixed feelings on the issue; We have allowed players to correct errors, but they tend to be more minor and more recent than this, or severe problems with ships from the start of the sim. It's one thing to catch a mistake a quarter or two down the line, but this is now in the realm of 3-4 years, the end result will be you having taken out a deferred, no-interest loan for those 800 tons.

My opinion would be to match the light tonnage figures, or blame it on a Russian in your design process somewhere, and move on.

Kaiser Kirk

Lightbringer and former European Imperialist

  • Send private message

9

Sunday, May 29th 2011, 10:10pm

Quoted

Originally posted by Brockpaine


My general preference would be to deal with the fixes in a rebuild, but this particular error can't really be handled effectively in that way.



Actually, I wonder if that's true. Welding of armor plate has been invented. One could add bulges for stability and floatation (keeping engine weight and bunkerage the same) and add a level to the barbettes, rebuild the hoists and off you go.... ? It's a bit beyond my knowledge to say if that's doable though...

10

Sunday, May 29th 2011, 10:25pm

Well then, here. I re-tweaked the sim to the correct light displacement, dropping some belt armour. Any further objections?

Quoted

[SIZE=3]Senegal-class, French Cruiser laid down 1937[/SIZE]

Displacement:
9,968 t light; 10,362 t standard; 12,124 t normal; 13,534 t full load

Dimensions: Length overall / water x beam x draught
649.14 ft / 636.48 ft x 56.76 ft (Bulges 63.98 ft) x 23.13 ft (normal load)
197.86 m / 194.00 m x 17.30 m (Bulges 19.50 m) x 7.05 m

Armament:
12 - 5.98" / 152 mm guns (4x3 guns), 110.23lbs / 50.00kg shells, 1937 Model
Breech loading guns in turrets (on barbettes)
on centreline ends, evenly spread, 2 raised mounts - superfiring
2 - 3.94" / 100 mm guns (1x2 guns), 35.27lbs / 16.00kg shells, 1937 Model
Dual purpose guns in a deck mount with hoist
on side amidships, all raised guns
8 - 3.94" / 100 mm guns (4x2 guns), 35.27lbs / 16.00kg shells, 1937 Model
Dual purpose guns in deck mounts with hoists
on side, evenly spread
16 - 1.57" / 40.0 mm guns (4x4 guns), 1.95lbs / 0.89kg shells, 1937 Model
Anti-aircraft guns in deck mounts
on side, evenly spread
6 - 0.50" / 12.7 mm guns in single mounts, 0.06lbs / 0.03kg shells, 1937 Model
Machine guns in deck mounts
on side, evenly spread
Weight of broadside 1,707 lbs / 774 kg
Shells per gun, main battery: 150
12 - 21.7" / 550 mm above water torpedoes

Armour:
- Belts: Width (max) Length (avg) Height (avg)
Main: 4.33" / 110 mm 374.67 ft / 114.20 m 9.19 ft / 2.80 m
Ends: 0.98" / 25 mm 261.48 ft / 79.70 m 9.19 ft / 2.80 m
Upper: 0.98" / 25 mm 377.30 ft / 115.00 m 9.84 ft / 3.00 m
Main Belt covers 91 % of normal length

- Gun armour: Face (max) Other gunhouse (avg) Barbette/hoist (max)
Main: 5.12" / 130 mm 2.76" / 70 mm 3.35" / 85 mm
2nd: 0.98" / 25 mm 0.20" / 5 mm -
3rd: 0.98" / 25 mm 0.20" / 5 mm -
4th: 0.98" / 25 mm 0.20" / 5 mm -

- Armour deck: 2.17" / 55 mm, Conning tower: 4.33" / 110 mm

Machinery:
Oil fired boilers, steam turbines,
Geared drive, 4 shafts, 99,625 shp / 74,320 Kw = 34.00 kts
Range 2,600nm at 30.00 kts
Bunker at max displacement = 3,172 tons

Complement:
577 - 751

Cost:
£4.941 million / $19.763 million

Distribution of weights at normal displacement:
Armament: 203 tons, 1.7 %
Armour: 2,234 tons, 18.4 %
- Belts: 861 tons, 7.1 %
- Torpedo bulkhead: 0 tons, 0.0 %
- Armament: 364 tons, 3.0 %
- Armour Deck: 959 tons, 7.9 %
- Conning Tower: 49 tons, 0.4 %
Machinery: 2,761 tons, 22.8 %
Hull, fittings & equipment: 4,619 tons, 38.1 %
Fuel, ammunition & stores: 2,156 tons, 17.8 %
Miscellaneous weights: 150 tons, 1.2 %

Overall survivability and seakeeping ability:
Survivability (Non-critical penetrating hits needed to sink ship):
14,864 lbs / 6,742 Kg = 138.7 x 6.0 " / 152 mm shells or 1.9 torpedoes
Stability (Unstable if below 1.00): 1.12
Metacentric height 2.7 ft / 0.8 m
Roll period: 16.5 seconds
Steadiness - As gun platform (Average = 50 %): 70 %
- Recoil effect (Restricted arc if above 1.00): 0.39
Seaboat quality (Average = 1.00): 1.18

Hull form characteristics:
Hull has rise forward of midbreak
and transom stern
Block coefficient: 0.451
Length to Beam Ratio: 9.95 : 1
'Natural speed' for length: 28.98 kts
Power going to wave formation at top speed: 56 %
Trim (Max stability = 0, Max steadiness = 100): 59
Bow angle (Positive = bow angles forward): 20.00 degrees
Stern overhang: 0.00 ft / 0.00 m
Freeboard (% = measuring location as a percentage of overall length):
- Stem: 34.78 ft / 10.60 m
- Forecastle (25 %): 24.44 ft / 7.45 m
- Mid (50 %): 24.44 ft / 7.45 m (14.60 ft / 4.45 m aft of break)
- Quarterdeck (15 %): 14.60 ft / 4.45 m
- Stern: 16.40 ft / 5.00 m
- Average freeboard: 20.69 ft / 6.31 m

Ship space, strength and comments:
Space - Hull below water (magazines/engines, low = better): 88.8 %
- Above water (accommodation/working, high = better): 111.9 %
Waterplane Area: 23,948 Square feet or 2,225 Square metres
Displacement factor (Displacement / loading): 127 %
Structure weight / hull surface area: 108 lbs/sq ft or 526 Kg/sq metre
Hull strength (Relative):
- Cross-sectional: 0.96
- Longitudinal: 1.49
- Overall: 1.00
Hull space for machinery, storage, compartmentation is adequate
Room for accommodation and workspaces is adequate
Ship has slow, easy roll, a good, steady gun platform

11

Sunday, May 29th 2011, 10:48pm

Naah. Won't work.

"My opinion would be to match the light tonnage figures, or blame it on a Russian in your design process somewhere, and move on."

We only do that on capital ships.

Which the Senegals ain't.

12

Sunday, May 29th 2011, 10:52pm

Super-Russian. For those Russians so extreme that even Russia rejects them.