You are not logged in.

Dear visitor, welcome to WesWorld. If this is your first visit here, please read the Help. It explains in detail how this page works. To use all features of this page, you should consider registering. Please use the registration form, to register here or read more information about the registration process. If you are already registered, please login here.

1

Thursday, September 16th 2010, 3:30am

Future US BB design


USS Kansas, United States Battleship laid down 1941

Displacement:
49,821 t light; 52,838 t standard; 56,863 t normal; 60,083 t full load

Dimensions: Length overall / water x beam x draught
891.55 ft / 860.00 ft x 110.00 ft (Bulges 116.00 ft) x 35.00 ft (normal load)
271.74 m / 262.13 m x 33.53 m (Bulges 35.36 m) x 10.67 m

Armament:
9 - 16.00" / 406 mm guns (3x3 guns), 2,700.00lbs / 1,224.70kg shells, 1941 Model
Breech loading guns in turrets (on barbettes)
on centreline ends, majority forward, 1 raised mount - superfiring
16 - 5.00" / 127 mm guns (8x2 guns), 62.50lbs / 28.35kg shells, 1941 Model
Dual purpose guns in deck mounts with hoists
on side, all amidships, all raised mounts - superfiring
4 - 5.00" / 127 mm guns (2x2 guns), 62.50lbs / 28.35kg shells, 1941 Model
Dual purpose guns in deck mounts with hoists
on centreline, all amidships, all raised mounts - superfiring
64 - 1.57" / 40.0 mm guns (16x4 guns), 1.95lbs / 0.88kg shells, 1941 Model
Anti-aircraft guns in deck mounts
on side, all amidships, 14 raised mounts - superfiring
34 - 0.79" / 20.0 mm guns in single mounts, 0.24lbs / 0.11kg shells, 1941 Model
Machine guns in deck mounts
on side, all amidships
Weight of broadside 25,683 lbs / 11,650 kg
Shells per gun, main battery: 130

Armour:
- Belts: Width (max) Length (avg) Height (avg)
Main: 17.0" / 432 mm 475.08 ft / 144.80 m 12.59 ft / 3.84 m
Ends: Unarmoured
Upper: 3.00" / 76 mm 475.08 ft / 144.80 m 8.00 ft / 2.44 m
Main Belt covers 85 % of normal length

- Torpedo Bulkhead and Bulges:
3.00" / 76 mm 475.08 ft / 144.80 m 32.58 ft / 9.93 m

- Gun armour: Face (max) Other gunhouse (avg) Barbette/hoist (max)
Main: 17.0" / 432 mm 10.0" / 254 mm 17.5" / 445 mm
2nd: 2.00" / 51 mm 1.00" / 25 mm 2.00" / 51 mm
3rd: 0.50" / 13 mm - -
4th: 0.50" / 13 mm - -

- Armour deck: 6.50" / 165 mm, Conning tower: 18.00" / 457 mm

Machinery:
Oil fired boilers, steam turbines,
Geared drive, 4 shafts, 228,903 shp / 170,762 Kw = 32.00 kts
Range 12,000nm at 15.00 kts
Bunker at max displacement = 7,246 tons

Complement:
1,840 - 2,393

Cost:
£28.877 million / $115.507 million

Distribution of weights at normal displacement:
Armament: 2,477 tons, 4.4 %
Armour: 19,430 tons, 34.2 %
- Belts: 4,993 tons, 8.8 %
- Torpedo bulkhead: 1,718 tons, 3.0 %
- Armament: 4,056 tons, 7.1 %
- Armour Deck: 8,089 tons, 14.2 %
- Conning Tower: 573 tons, 1.0 %
Machinery: 6,049 tons, 10.6 %
Hull, fittings & equipment: 21,715 tons, 38.2 %
Fuel, ammunition & stores: 7,042 tons, 12.4 %
Miscellaneous weights: 150 tons, 0.3 %

Overall survivability and seakeeping ability:
Survivability (Non-critical penetrating hits needed to sink ship):
75,436 lbs / 34,217 Kg = 36.8 x 16.0 " / 406 mm shells or 12.2 torpedoes
Stability (Unstable if below 1.00): 1.16
Metacentric height 7.6 ft / 2.3 m
Roll period: 17.7 seconds
Steadiness - As gun platform (Average = 50 %): 51 %
- Recoil effect (Restricted arc if above 1.00): 0.55
Seaboat quality (Average = 1.00): 1.01

Hull form characteristics:
Hull has a flush deck
Block coefficient: 0.570
Length to Beam Ratio: 7.41 : 1
'Natural speed' for length: 29.33 kts
Power going to wave formation at top speed: 53 %
Trim (Max stability = 0, Max steadiness = 100): 50
Bow angle (Positive = bow angles forward): 32.00 degrees
Stern overhang: 7.80 ft / 2.38 m
Freeboard (% = measuring location as a percentage of overall length):
- Stem: 38.00 ft / 11.58 m
- Forecastle (24 %): 22.00 ft / 6.71 m
- Mid (50 %): 21.00 ft / 6.40 m
- Quarterdeck (23 %): 21.00 ft / 6.40 m
- Stern: 23.00 ft / 7.01 m
- Average freeboard: 23.11 ft / 7.04 m

Ship space, strength and comments:
Space - Hull below water (magazines/engines, low = better): 85.0 %
- Above water (accommodation/working, high = better): 147.9 %
Waterplane Area: 67,271 Square feet or 6,250 Square metres
Displacement factor (Displacement / loading): 110 %
Structure weight / hull surface area: 226 lbs/sq ft or 1,104 Kg/sq metre
Hull strength (Relative):
- Cross-sectional: 0.98
- Longitudinal: 1.20
- Overall: 1.00
Hull space for machinery, storage, compartmentation is adequate
Room for accommodation and workspaces is excellent

Basically the Montana with one less turret and more speed. Hull form differs from the historical Iowa since it doesn't have the beam restriction of the Panama Canal.

Updated the Springsharp, forgot to include the super heavy 16" and fixed the freeboard.

This post has been edited 6 times, last edit by "CanisD" (Sep 17th 2010, 12:34am)


2

Thursday, September 16th 2010, 3:42am

Impressive!

3

Thursday, September 16th 2010, 4:30am

Call me Capt Nit-picky, and I'm sure it probably changes the sim very little, if at all, but I count 16 Quad 40mm instead of 15 and only 34 20mm instead of 36.

Very scary overall though. Nice job Canis...looks like you've not lost your touch while you were away.

4

Thursday, September 16th 2010, 4:52am

Nice! And named after my home state, too!

5

Thursday, September 16th 2010, 5:21am

I find it odd that the USS Texas is now the smallest battleship in the fleet... :D

6

Thursday, September 16th 2010, 6:37am

Looks mostly like the proposed King/Nimitz changes to Kentucky and Illinois. Nifty.

Quoted

Originally posted by TexanCowboy
I find it odd that the USS Texas is now the smallest battleship in the fleet... :D


Is so small. So very small.

(technically, New York likely displaces less at the moment)

7

Thursday, September 16th 2010, 7:48am

Everything's supposed to be bigger in Texas. Perhaps we should try to bribe Canis to Scrap the Texas and have him build a pocket battleship called Texas. As long as it is smaller than the current one. *runs away* :D

HoOmAn

Keeper of the Sacred Block Coefficient

  • Send private message

8

Thursday, September 16th 2010, 8:07am

Very impressive indeed.

I wonder why you use an upper belt. ISn´t the USN the inventor of the all-or-nothing?

Another thing - Why are funnel and bridge build togehter. It makes my eyes hurt but the real problem is, that vibrations from the funnel can transfer into the bridge tower. The ship is far from cramped, so why take that risk?

I still wonder why the USN relies on the 16"/50. Of course, we all know it is an awesome weapon and OTL the USN could expect to rule the world with it. There were no bigger caliber guns around in the world (intel reports on the new japanese ships spoke of 16" too). But in WesWorld things are different and it is no secret there will lbe plenty of modern BBs with bigger guns. Why would the USN allow her battle fleet to fall behind?

Cheers,

HoOmAn

9

Thursday, September 16th 2010, 8:42am

I dislike guns larger than 16" because I think the disadvantages outweigh the advantages. You get fewer guns, shorter barrel life, little deck penetration, etc...
http://www.navweaps.com/Weapons/WNUS_18-48_mk1.htm

The design is based on the King/Nimitz design. I'll fix the AA goofs. Texas will probably be ending her career in the near future, or at least becoming a training ship to replace New York, with New York replacing Arkansas as a target ship. The four Montanas will probably replace the Nevadas and Pennsylvanias when they complete, depending on the world situation. These would replace the New Mexicos when they complete in the mid 1940's.

10

Thursday, September 16th 2010, 3:16pm

I definitely agree to stick with the 16". Larger does not mean better. :)

11

Thursday, September 16th 2010, 7:37pm

What about a longer caliber gun?

12

Thursday, September 16th 2010, 7:39pm

Quoted

Originally posted by klagldsf
What about a longer caliber gun?

Increases barrel wear rather sharply for these bigger guns.

13

Thursday, September 16th 2010, 7:40pm



The concept was essentially a proprosal to complete Kentucky and Illinois to a modified design, with some adjustments in armour, a loss of a knot in speed, and a similar superstructure consolodation as was done with the Fargo and Oregon City classes to improve AA arcs.

As for barrel size, Canis is making a similar decision I made with the Excelsiors; I considered 16.5" and 18" guns, but decided the RoF and smothering effect from 12 15" was a beter value.

14

Friday, September 17th 2010, 12:28am

The Metric monster has attacked

Quoted

Main Belt covers 83 % of normal length Main belt does not fully cover magazines and engineering spaces
probably mm's

15

Friday, September 17th 2010, 12:40am

Tweaked it some more. I kept the armor scheme identical to my Montana design. Several references describe an upper belt when describing her armor scheme. I don't see the point of a 3" belt and it could easily be ignored w/o changing the weight/build time.

16

Friday, September 17th 2010, 11:48am

Agreed, but...

Quoted

I don't see the point of a 3" belt and it could easily be ignored w/o changing the weight/build time.


A 3" belt on the ends would be useful to prevent splinters and small caliber hits at the waterline impairing her speed.


I'm laying down something similar a year later:


Pobeda class, Russian Battlecruiser laid down 1942

Displacement:
47,799 t light; 50,378 t standard; 55,948 t normal; 60,405 t full load

Dimensions: Length overall / water x beam x draught
908.56 ft / 885.83 ft x 104.99 ft (Bulges 116.14 ft) x 32.48 ft (normal load)
276.93 m / 270.00 m x 32.00 m (Bulges 35.40 m) x 9.90 m

Armament:
9 - 16.54" / 420 mm guns (3x3 guns), 2,645.55lbs / 1,200.00kg shells, 1942 Model
Breech loading guns in turrets (on barbettes)
on centreline ends, majority forward
4 - 5.12" / 130 mm guns (2x2 guns), 79.37lbs / 36.00kg shells, 1942 Model
Automatic rapid fire guns in deck mounts with hoists
on centreline ends, evenly spread, all raised mounts
20 - 5.12" / 130 mm guns (10x2 guns), 79.37lbs / 36.00kg shells, 1942 Model
Automatic rapid fire guns in deck mounts with hoists
on side, evenly spread, 4 raised mounts
72 - 1.46" / 37.0 mm guns (18x4 guns), 1.55lbs / 0.70kg shells, 1942 Model
Anti-aircraft guns in deck mounts with hoists
on side, evenly spread, 8 raised mounts
16 - 0.55" / 14.0 mm guns (8x2 guns), 0.08lbs / 0.04kg shells, 1942 Model
Machine guns in deck mounts
on side, evenly spread, all raised mounts
Weight of broadside 25,828 lbs / 11,715 kg
Shells per gun, main battery: 100

Armour:
- Belts: Width (max) Length (avg) Height (avg)
Main: 15.7" / 400 mm 492.13 ft / 150.00 m 13.12 ft / 4.00 m
Ends: Unarmoured
Main Belt covers 85 % of normal length

- Torpedo Bulkhead and Bulges:
1.97" / 50 mm 492.13 ft / 150.00 m 34.12 ft / 10.40 m

- Gun armour: Face (max) Other gunhouse (avg) Barbette/hoist (max)
Main: 15.7" / 400 mm 9.84" / 250 mm 13.8" / 350 mm
2nd: 0.98" / 25 mm 0.20" / 5 mm -
3rd: 0.98" / 25 mm 0.20" / 5 mm -
4th: 0.98" / 25 mm 0.20" / 5 mm -

- Armour deck: 5.91" / 150 mm, Conning tower: 15.75" / 400 mm

Machinery:
Oil fired boilers, steam turbines,
Geared drive, 4 shafts, 196,170 shp / 146,343 Kw = 32.00 kts
Range 12,000nm at 18.00 kts
Bunker at max displacement = 10,027 tons

Complement:
1,818 - 2,364

Cost:
£30.171 million / $120.684 million

Distribution of weights at normal displacement:
Armament: 2,799 tons, 5.0 %
Armour: 17,466 tons, 31.2 %
- Belts: 4,444 tons, 7.9 %
- Torpedo bulkhead: 1,223 tons, 2.2 %
- Armament: 3,661 tons, 6.5 %
- Armour Deck: 7,642 tons, 13.7 %
- Conning Tower: 496 tons, 0.9 %
Machinery: 5,125 tons, 9.2 %
Hull, fittings & equipment: 22,159 tons, 39.6 %
Fuel, ammunition & stores: 8,150 tons, 14.6 %
Miscellaneous weights: 250 tons, 0.4 %

Overall survivability and seakeeping ability:
Survivability (Non-critical penetrating hits needed to sink ship):
81,635 lbs / 37,029 Kg = 36.1 x 16.5 " / 420 mm shells or 12.4 torpedoes
Stability (Unstable if below 1.00): 1.14
Metacentric height 6.9 ft / 2.1 m
Roll period: 18.6 seconds
Steadiness - As gun platform (Average = 50 %): 70 %
- Recoil effect (Restricted arc if above 1.00): 0.69
Seaboat quality (Average = 1.00): 1.20

Hull form characteristics:
Hull has a flush deck
and transom stern
Block coefficient: 0.586
Length to Beam Ratio: 7.63 : 1
'Natural speed' for length: 34.38 kts
Power going to wave formation at top speed: 52 %
Trim (Max stability = 0, Max steadiness = 100): 58
Bow angle (Positive = bow angles forward): 30.00 degrees
Stern overhang: 0.00 ft / 0.00 m
Freeboard (% = measuring location as a percentage of overall length):
- Stem: 39.37 ft / 12.00 m
- Forecastle (30 %): 25.26 ft / 7.70 m
- Mid (50 %): 24.44 ft / 7.45 m
- Quarterdeck (15 %): 25.26 ft / 7.70 m
- Stern: 30.18 ft / 9.20 m
- Average freeboard: 27.10 ft / 8.26 m

Ship space, strength and comments:
Space - Hull below water (magazines/engines, low = better): 84.8 %
- Above water (accommodation/working, high = better): 182.1 %
Waterplane Area: 69,947 Square feet or 6,498 Square metres
Displacement factor (Displacement / loading): 111 %
Structure weight / hull surface area: 219 lbs/sq ft or 1,067 Kg/sq metre
Hull strength (Relative):
- Cross-sectional: 0.97
- Longitudinal: 1.27
- Overall: 1.00
Hull space for machinery, storage, compartmentation is adequate
Room for accommodation and workspaces is excellent
Ship has slow, easy roll, a good, steady gun platform
Good seaboat, rides out heavy weather easily

Main belt includes an 80mm decapping plate and a 350mm internal belt inclined at 15 degrees. A 30mm layer of the torpedo bulkhead is incorporated into the main belt.

Radars:
Surface Search- 10 tons
Air Search (2) - 20 tons
Main battery fire control - 10 tons
Secondary battery fire control (2) - 20 tons
Antiaircraft fire control (2) - 20 tons

Aviation:
2 seaplanes, 1 catapult-50 tons

12 twin 130mm automatic DP mounts-120 tons

On her completion, the Northern Fleet will have 2 battle groups, one with the Petr Velikis and Izmails, going 26kts and 30kts respectively, and one with the Soyuz Nerushimy, Slava, and Pobeda classes, going 28, 29, and 32 kts respectively. All steady gun platforms.

Between them they'll pack 188 420mm guns with a broadside of 225,600kg.

Yes, I'm an N2 Rule fanatic.

HoOmAn

Keeper of the Sacred Block Coefficient

  • Send private message

17

Friday, September 17th 2010, 1:56pm

On that sketch Shin posted, it does look as if funnel and bridge are connected. So will you keep that feature? Despite vibrations it might also be an issue when manovering at low speed in windy areas. Such structure acts like a sail and will cause some drift.

18

Friday, September 17th 2010, 3:27pm

Well, I figure the Iowa had that same feature with its forward stack. I seem to remember reading that it had something to do with preventing vibration in the director.

19

Friday, September 17th 2010, 4:54pm

California, Tennessee, West Virginia and the South Dakota's all had that feature and I don't recall any issues being noted about vibrations.

20

Saturday, September 18th 2010, 1:52am

N2 rule?