Quoted
Originally posted by HoOmAn
The F-6E is in service with the RSAF for long and will be replaced by F-6H soon. Hundreds of planes are thus easily available for little money and the Swallow is still rated among the worlds finest fighters.
Quoted
Originally posted by HoOmAn
Different engine, different coolers/wings, different cockpit layout and canopy.... Not sure if it is possible to upgrade the older E type. A hyprid is an option, probably for export, using the more powerful engine with the old fuselage and coolers.
Quoted
Originally posted by BruceDuncan
Quoted
Originally posted by Hrolf Hakonson
Focke-Wulf offers the Fw-190J (a version of the OTL Fw-190 A-4 armed with 2 7.92mm MG-17s and 4 15mm MG-151s) for Yugoslavian consideration.
What would be the probable delivery schedule for an initial quantity of 100 aircraft, with an option quantity of 100 aircraft?
Can the aircraft carry external fuel tanks?
Can customer-specified armament fits be accomodated in the design. The preferred armament would be six 13.2mm machineguns of indigenous design.
Quoted
Originally posted by Marek Gutkowski
Quoted
Originally posted by BruceDuncan
Can customer-specified armament fits be accomodated in the design. The preferred armament would be six 13.2mm machineguns of indigenous design.
This post has been edited 1 times, last edit by "Hrolf Hakonson" (May 27th 2010, 7:53pm)
Quoted
Originally posted by Hrolf Hakonson
Actually, the Bf-109As you already have are armed with the 15mm MG-151, each is armed with a pair of them mounted in the wing roots, along with the 7.92mm MG-17s in the nose decking. See the entry on the -109A in the German encyclopedia.
Quoted
Originally posted by Hrolf Hakonson
Delivery of an initial 100 aircraft could complete by June 30, 1940, with an additional 100 aircraft delivered by June 1941.
External fuel tanks or bombs of up to 500 kg can be carried on an underfuselage rack.
Armament could be changed, details of the proposed 13.2mm MGs would need to be exchanged with Focke-Wulf so placement options could be examined. Is the design suitable for synchronization, or not?
Quoted
Originally posted by Hrolf Hakonson
Browning designs, while they are synchronizeable, do not like being synchronized, taking a large hit in ROF to do so. This means that the nose and wing-root locations normally used for mounting weapons on the Fw-190 are not desireable locations for mounting Colt-Browning designs. That leaves the outer wing, where a pair of 13.2mm MGs could be mounted (replacing the outer 15mm MG-151), but there does not appear to be room in the wing structure for a third weapon there.
Quoted
Originally posted by Hrolf Hakonson
If that's what the customer wants, that's what the customer will get.
Forum Software: Burning Board® Lite 2.1.2 pl 1, developed by WoltLab® GmbH