You are not logged in.

1

Wednesday, September 23rd 2009, 7:13pm

First try to a armoured car


2

Wednesday, September 23rd 2009, 7:16pm

Might need some more ground clearance...

3

Wednesday, September 23rd 2009, 7:33pm

Quoted

Originally posted by Red Admiral
Might need some more ground clearance...



Agree, It'll be modfied soon

4

Wednesday, September 23rd 2009, 8:29pm

2 or 4 MG? BTW what are those spikes under the chassi?

Looking forward to the next version ( and accompanying tank?)

This post has been edited 1 times, last edit by "Vukovlad" (Sep 23rd 2009, 8:33pm)


5

Wednesday, September 23rd 2009, 8:43pm

Currently, the Peruvian army has some old tanks and just recently (1937) took delivery of a smallish number (approximately 70) WW Panzer IIIs. The prior government paid for another 2 shipments, but the manufacturers are pretty busy so they won't be arriving until the end of 1937 and the middle of 1938.

6

Wednesday, September 23rd 2009, 8:47pm

Quoted

Originally posted by Vukovlad
2 or 4 MG? BTW what are those spikes under the chassi?

Looking forward to the next version ( and accompanying tank?)



Thanks!! The spikes are a detail I see on a lot of armoured car design, I've found for insperation. but I'll remove it too. I was thinking on browing M 0.5 call machine guns. but what is a good choise 2 or 4?

7

Wednesday, September 23rd 2009, 8:56pm

Quoted

Originally posted by Hrolf Hakonson
Currently, the Peruvian army has some old tanks and just recently (1937) took delivery of a smallish number (approximately 70) WW Panzer IIIs. The prior government paid for another 2 shipments, but the manufacturers are pretty busy so they won't be arriving until the end of 1937 and the middle of 1938.


So no need for a new tank?

8

Wednesday, September 23rd 2009, 9:36pm

Why buy a crappy Panzer III when you can buy the awesome and powerful Type 89 tank. :)


... whoops! Wrong century! :D

*looks at real Type 89*
... that actually looks like a wheelie bin... Never mind what I said. :)

9

Thursday, September 24th 2009, 6:20pm



Better?

10

Thursday, September 24th 2009, 6:55pm

Definitely better. I think it looks quite big though. I put together a quick 4x4 version which I thought looked a bit better.

11

Thursday, September 24th 2009, 8:27pm

So She has now 4 back, and 2 front, see I need to do 4 front and 4 back? Ok, sure I'll do it :D
Btw Thank-you

12

Thursday, September 24th 2009, 8:33pm

Quoted

Originally posted by ALVAMA
So She has now 4 back, and 2 front, see I need to do 4 front and 4 back? Ok, sure I'll do it :D
Btw Thank-you


Sorry, I meant a four wheel drive version, i.e. four wheels in two pairs - one at the front and one at the back.

13

Thursday, September 24th 2009, 8:33pm

Quoted

Originally posted by ALVAMA
So She has now 4 back, and 2 front, see I need to do 4 front and 4 back? Ok, sure I'll do it :D
Btw Thank-you

What 4x4 means in this case is four powered wheels out of four total wheels. The current design (which looks potentially quite useful) is 6x6, assuming all wheels are powered.

14

Thursday, September 24th 2009, 8:41pm


15

Friday, September 25th 2009, 3:14pm

Sorry Guys, Something I think on a other way by English.... :( But I understand know, Thanks Friend!! I'll update the drawing. You do you have save it a .JPEG? But are you sure the gun won't be too heaye for the chassi? The Germans use 6 wheels too! :D :]

16

Friday, September 25th 2009, 3:23pm

Depends on what you're using for guns. The Germans had 4, 6 & 8 wheeled armored cars, all armed with a 20mm cannon and a 7.92mm MG, the 8 wheeled cars were the only ones that got the heavier weapons (50mm & 75mm cannon and 75mm howitzers). By the look of the picture, I'd GUESS (but I could be wrong) that the guns shown for the Peruvian AC are rifle-caliber machineguns, not cannon of any sort, so 4 wheels will be fine for the recoil.