Dear visitor, welcome to WesWorld.
If this is your first visit here, please read the Help. It explains in detail how this page works.
To use all features of this page, you should consider registering.
Please use the registration form, to register here or read more information about the registration process.
If you are already registered, please login here.
Tanks and Aircraft
Since I am bored i thought I would post som homebrewed fighters
This post has been edited 2 times, last edit by "Vukovlad" (Jan 2nd 2010, 10:57pm)
That's a nifty-looking fiddly bit on the tail. Looks like a flowerified snowflake.
Is that the Manchuko flag making up the roundel?
The Upper one has the OTL Manchuko roundel and the Imperial CoA
The lower one has a modified early Chinese star for a ATL Democratic Republic of Manchuria
Heh now I want you to be bored more often
Originally posted by Kaiser Kirk
Heh now I want you to be bored more often
+2
Since no one protested, here are two SMOM aircraft that flew in support of the SMOM Navy during the siege of Acre
This post has been edited 1 times, last edit by "Vukovlad" (Mar 10th 2011, 12:29am)
Nice, the Srs 1 is that a liquid cooled engine like the Ta-152 or a turboprop?
Originally posted by Vukovlad
Nice, the Srs 1 is that a liquid cooled engine like the Ta-152 or a turboprop?
Liquid cooled with annular radiator in the nose.
OK, for some reason I get a Wyvern wibe from it
Originally posted by Vukovlad
OK, for some reason I get a Wyvern wibe from it
The Wyvern is definitely a fairly large influence for the design.
Looking forward to what you will come up with next
What about this? Its within the +3yr guidelines, though the estimated performances might be called "optimistic" with 1050km/h predicted.
This post has been edited 1 times, last edit by "Red Admiral" (Jul 13th 2009, 1:11am)
New fast unarmed bomber or the next Ala Littoria mailplane?
Vuk, that last fighter looks very good, nice and sleek.
RA, The G.55 looks good, nice and sleek looking although the radial-engined version looks a little stumpy up front.
Whay have you gone for an annular radiator? Is there much improvement with it? I can't think of many OTL successful fighters with them off the top of my head.
The twin-engined plane looks very optimistic, the tail looks too small for decent directional stability and seems very fragile for a 1,000km/h aircraft (I'm assuming around 630-640mph).
Annular radiators weren't all that common on fighters, but the Fw-190 D series and the Ta-152 were pretty solid......
The annular radiator may be a little more resistant to battle damage and it nicely groups the engine parts all together. From reading a book on aerodynamics recently, the annular configuration is one of the lowest drag configurations apart from wing radiators. I couldn't draw out wing radiators how I wanted so went for the annular radiator. Now I've revised the design so it's more like the historical G.55.
The other plane is a bomber designed by Campini with a 3000km range cruising at 750km/h at 10,000m with maximum speed of 1050km/h
Campini's design is a jet, I assume?
Saturday, April 20th 2024, 6:38pm
Go to the top of the page
Quoted 
