You are not logged in.

Dear visitor, welcome to WesWorld. If this is your first visit here, please read the Help. It explains in detail how this page works. To use all features of this page, you should consider registering. Please use the registration form, to register here or read more information about the registration process. If you are already registered, please login here.

1

Sunday, January 18th 2009, 8:44pm

Conversion to Auxiliaries

How much of a refit is necessary if I want to convert a civilian ship into a military auxiliary? For instance, I'd like Chile to acquire a civilian tanker and convert it to these specifications:

Quoted

Angamos, Chilean Fleet Oiler laid down 1937

Displacement:
8,562 t light; 8,828 t standard; 12,886 t normal; 16,133 t full load

Dimensions: Length overall / water x beam x draught
493.94 ft / 480.00 ft x 65.00 ft x 26.00 ft (normal load)
150.55 m / 146.30 m x 19.81 m x 7.92 m

Armament:
2 - 4.33" / 110 mm guns (1x2 guns), 40.61lbs / 18.42kg shells, 1937 Model
Dual purpose guns in a deck mount with hoist
on centreline forward
6 - 1.46" / 37.0 mm guns (2x3 guns), 1.55lbs / 0.70kg shells, 1937 Model
Anti-aircraft guns in deck mounts
on centreline, all amidships
6 - 0.79" / 20.0 mm guns in single mounts, 0.24lbs / 0.11kg shells, 1937 Model
Anti-aircraft guns in deck mounts
on side, evenly spread
Weight of broadside 92 lbs / 42 kg
Shells per gun, main battery: 150

Armour:
- Gun armour: Face (max) Other gunhouse (avg) Barbette/hoist (max)
Main: 1.57" / 40 mm 1.57" / 40 mm -
2nd: 0.79" / 20 mm - -

Machinery:
Diesel Internal combustion motors,
Geared drive, 2 shafts, 21,358 shp / 15,933 Kw = 21.00 kts
Range 30,000nm at 15.00 kts
Bunker at max displacement = 7,305 tons

Complement:
604 - 786

Cost:
£2.139 million / $8.557 million

Distribution of weights at normal displacement:
Armament: 11 tons, 0.1 %
Armour: 10 tons, 0.1 %
- Belts: 0 tons, 0.0 %
- Torpedo bulkhead: 0 tons, 0.0 %
- Armament: 10 tons, 0.1 %
- Armour Deck: 0 tons, 0.0 %
- Conning Tower: 0 tons, 0.0 %
Machinery: 592 tons, 4.6 %
Hull, fittings & equipment: 2,949 tons, 22.9 %
Fuel, ammunition & stores: 4,324 tons, 33.6 %
Miscellaneous weights: 5,000 tons, 38.8 %

Overall survivability and seakeeping ability:
Survivability (Non-critical penetrating hits needed to sink ship):
20,247 lbs / 9,184 Kg = 498.5 x 4.3 " / 110 mm shells or 3.0 torpedoes
Stability (Unstable if below 1.00): 1.08
Metacentric height 3.0 ft / 0.9 m
Roll period: 15.7 seconds
Steadiness - As gun platform (Average = 50 %): 50 %
- Recoil effect (Restricted arc if above 1.00): 0.01
Seaboat quality (Average = 1.00): 1.73

Hull form characteristics:
Hull has a flush deck
Block coefficient: 0.556
Length to Beam Ratio: 7.38 : 1
'Natural speed' for length: 21.91 kts
Power going to wave formation at top speed: 46 %
Trim (Max stability = 0, Max steadiness = 100): 29
Bow angle (Positive = bow angles forward): 10.00 degrees
Stern overhang: 9.00 ft / 2.74 m
Freeboard (% = measuring location as a percentage of overall length):
- Stem: 28.00 ft / 8.53 m
- Forecastle (20 %): 16.00 ft / 4.88 m
- Mid (40 %): 16.00 ft / 4.88 m
- Quarterdeck (15 %): 16.00 ft / 4.88 m
- Stern: 16.00 ft / 4.88 m
- Average freeboard: 16.96 ft / 5.17 m

Ship space, strength and comments:
Space - Hull below water (magazines/engines, low = better): 58.7 %
- Above water (accommodation/working, high = better): 86.1 %
Waterplane Area: 21,897 Square feet or 2,034 Square metres
Displacement factor (Displacement / loading): 205 %
Structure weight / hull surface area: 86 lbs/sq ft or 420 Kg/sq metre
Hull strength (Relative):
- Cross-sectional: 0.96
- Longitudinal: 1.56
- Overall: 1.01
Hull space for machinery, storage, compartmentation is excellent
Room for accommodation and workspaces is cramped
Excellent seaboat, comfortable, can fire her guns in the heaviest weather


The only changes I'd expect would be in some refueling-hose handling equipment, and the addition of the 110mm twin, 37mm and 20mm AA mounts. The additional armament would only add 21 tons of weight. But under the rules, adding guns of 66mm to 195mm (no barbette mods) is a 25% refit.

Looking at some of the similar project conversions, it appears people have just added the tonnage of the new guns and armour to complete the modification: for instance, Germany's Altmark received 34 tons to complete it's conversion.

What then is my price to convert this ship? Do I need to make the 25% refit the rules appear to demand? Or do I just add 21 tons for the addition of the guns and armour?

2

Friday, January 23rd 2009, 3:08pm

I just used the cost of the equipment, because that's what I was told at the time. It seems right, for ships like these, where what’s being installed is just bolt-ons with minimal effect on the ship itself (though you might want to go to just a deck mount for your 110mms, otherwise you're making a bigger modification to the ship). But if we're supposed to pay a full refit cost, that's OK, I can adjust the build plan to accommodate.

3

Friday, January 23rd 2009, 5:05pm

Yes, I've changed that feature already to just be a deck mount. Thanks.

4

Friday, January 23rd 2009, 5:24pm

A suggestion

A civilian ship pressed quickly into service pays only the cost of the modifications, but absorbs damage like a civilian ship, i.e. damage to sink divided by 10.

A civilian ship that pays the cost of a 25% refit (or more) gets the "damage to sink" of a warship, as per the "SpringStyle" notes.

This post has been edited 1 times, last edit by "AdmKuznetsov" (Jan 25th 2009, 6:14pm)


5

Friday, January 23rd 2009, 5:27pm

That'd be acceptable to me!

6

Friday, January 23rd 2009, 5:31pm

For this sort of auxilliary, that would be perfectly acceptable. I don't know how efficient it would be to compartment and specially design a tanker (for example) to military standards.

7

Friday, January 23rd 2009, 5:39pm

Probably not very efficient. I was looking mainly at things like the Klondike-class destroyer tenders (conversions from Type C3 freighters) or the "T2" tankers being pressed into service as fleet oilers.