Quoted
Hyderabad, Indian Battlecruiser laid down 1938
Displacement:
17,942 t light; 18,711 t standard; 20,143 t normal; 21,289 t full load
Dimensions: Length overall / water x beam x draught
731.97 ft / 715.22 ft x 72.83 ft x 24.61 ft (normal load)
223.10 m / 218.00 m x 22.20 m x 7.50 m
Armament:
8 - 11.02" / 280 mm guns (4x2 guns), 669.80lbs / 303.81kg shells, 1938 Model
Breech loading guns in turrets (on barbettes)
on centreline ends, evenly spread, 2 raised mounts - superfiring
12 - 4.92" / 125 mm guns (6x2 guns), 59.59lbs / 27.03kg shells, 1938 Model
Dual purpose guns in deck mounts with hoists
on side, evenly spread, 2 raised mounts
20 - 1.38" / 35.0 mm guns (10x2 guns), 1.31lbs / 0.59kg shells, 1938 Model
Anti-aircraft guns in deck mounts
on side, evenly spread, all raised mounts
24 - 0.59" / 15.0 mm guns (6x4 guns), 0.10lbs / 0.05kg shells, 1938 Model
Machine guns in deck mounts
on side, evenly spread, all raised mounts
Weight of broadside 6,102 lbs / 2,768 kg
Shells per gun, main battery: 105
Armour:
- Belts: Width (max) Length (avg) Height (avg)
Main: 9.06" / 230 mm 403.12 ft / 122.87 m 10.50 ft / 3.20 m
Ends: Unarmoured
Main Belt covers 87 % of normal length
- Gun armour: Face (max) Other gunhouse (avg) Barbette/hoist (max)
Main: 9.84" / 250 mm 3.94" / 100 mm 9.06" / 230 mm
2nd: 1.38" / 35 mm 0.98" / 25 mm 1.18" / 30 mm
3rd: 0.59" / 15 mm - -
4th: 0.39" / 10 mm - -
- Armour deck: 3.15" / 80 mm, Conning tower: 2.76" / 70 mm
Machinery:
Oil fired boilers, steam turbines,
Geared drive, 4 shafts, 126,015 shp / 94,007 Kw = 33.24 kts
Range 8,000nm at 15.00 kts
Bunker at max displacement = 2,578 tons
Complement:
845 - 1,099
Cost:
£9.874 million / $39.495 million
Distribution of weights at normal displacement:
Armament: 763 tons, 3.8 %
Armour: 5,250 tons, 26.1 %
- Belts: 1,638 tons, 8.1 %
- Torpedo bulkhead: 0 tons, 0.0 %
- Armament: 1,363 tons, 6.8 %
- Armour Deck: 2,205 tons, 10.9 %
- Conning Tower: 44 tons, 0.2 %
Machinery: 3,451 tons, 17.1 %
Hull, fittings & equipment: 8,379 tons, 41.6 %
Fuel, ammunition & stores: 2,201 tons, 10.9 %
Miscellaneous weights: 100 tons, 0.5 %
Overall survivability and seakeeping ability:
Survivability (Non-critical penetrating hits needed to sink ship):
26,388 lbs / 11,969 Kg = 39.4 x 11.0 " / 280 mm shells or 2.5 torpedoes
Stability (Unstable if below 1.00): 1.05
Metacentric height 3.4 ft / 1.0 m
Roll period: 16.5 seconds
Steadiness - As gun platform (Average = 50 %): 51 %
- Recoil effect (Restricted arc if above 1.00): 0.88
Seaboat quality (Average = 1.00): 1.00
Hull form characteristics:
Hull has rise forward of midbreak
and transom stern
Block coefficient: 0.550
Length to Beam Ratio: 9.82 : 1
'Natural speed' for length: 30.40 kts
Power going to wave formation at top speed: 55 %
Trim (Max stability = 0, Max steadiness = 100): 51
Bow angle (Positive = bow angles forward): 25.00 degrees
Stern overhang: 3.28 ft / 1.00 m
Freeboard (% = measuring location as a percentage of overall length):
- Stem: 28.87 ft / 8.80 m
- Forecastle (35 %): 23.46 ft / 7.15 m
- Mid (75 %): 23.46 ft / 7.15 m (15.58 ft / 4.75 m aft of break)
- Quarterdeck (15 %): 15.58 ft / 4.75 m
- Stern: 15.58 ft / 4.75 m
- Average freeboard: 22.25 ft / 6.78 m
Ship tends to be wet forward
Ship space, strength and comments:
Space - Hull below water (magazines/engines, low = better): 85.0 %
- Above water (accommodation/working, high = better): 186.7 %
Waterplane Area: 37,849 Square feet or 3,516 Square metres
Displacement factor (Displacement / loading): 110 %
Structure weight / hull surface area: 146 lbs/sq ft or 715 Kg/sq metre
Hull strength (Relative):
- Cross-sectional: 0.99
- Longitudinal: 1.23
- Overall: 1.01
Hull space for machinery, storage, compartmentation is adequate
Room for accommodation and workspaces is excellent
This post has been edited 2 times, last edit by "perdedor99" (Oct 22nd 2008, 9:36pm)
Quoted
Originally posted by Brockpaine
Woo!
In fairness, Perdedor, you're too good of a simmer to hide stuff like this. All of the designs you've built to date have been well-balanced and reasonable, and so when you revealed the 16x8" Hyderabad, it was just too much of an oddball not to be another Satyaki ploy. My choice of guns came from the commentary in the Delhi entry in the encyclopedia and the switch worked too well in my mind for it to be a coincidence.
The Satyaki ploy had me completely fooled, though.
((FWIW, I spend a lot of time entering other folks' more interesting ships into SS so that I can try to identify their design patterns, and seeing what I can make "better". I've spent most of my time going through ships designed by Perdedor, Alt-Naval, and AdmK since I like many of their cruiser and battleship designs.))
Quoted
Originally posted by Brockpaine
((FWIW, I spend a lot of time entering other folks' more interesting ships into SS so that I can try to identify their design patterns, and seeing what I can make "better". I've spent most of my time going through ships designed by Perdedor, Alt-Naval, and AdmK since I like many of their cruiser and battleship designs.))
Quoted
Originally posted by HoOmAn
Quoted
Originally posted by Brockpaine
((FWIW, I spend a lot of time entering other folks' more interesting ships into SS so that I can try to identify their design patterns, and seeing what I can make "better". I've spent most of my time going through ships designed by Perdedor, Alt-Naval, and AdmK since I like many of their cruiser and battleship designs.))
That´s interesting. Should you ever run an analysis of my designs let me know what you found out. Thanks.
Quoted
Originally posted by Brockpaine
"In terms of usefulness, another pair of light cruisers, smaller than the Danubes and faster, might prove to be advantageous. As we saw during the South American War, the South African 'Pony Express' caused significant havoc due to the combination of a good propaganda machine and their ships' relative inability to be overtaken in force by the Argentines."
Forum Software: Burning Board® Lite 2.1.2 pl 1, developed by WoltLab® GmbH