You are not logged in.

Dear visitor, welcome to WesWorld. If this is your first visit here, please read the Help. It explains in detail how this page works. To use all features of this page, you should consider registering. Please use the registration form, to register here or read more information about the registration process. If you are already registered, please login here.

1

Friday, April 25th 2008, 12:28am

Siam Minisub

Basically, this is a WWI-size coastal submarine built with 'modern' technology. It has a nice, long range and a decent number of torpedoes for it's size. Two tubes are internal with two reloads; two tubes are external, so the commander (actually a Petty Officer) can fire a salvo of 4 torpedoes at a particularly juicy target.



Quoted

A-1, Siamese Minisub laid down 1936

Displacement:
125 t light; 128 t standard; 137 t normal; 144 t full load

Dimensions: Length overall / water x beam x draught
82.02 ft / 82.02 ft x 13.12 ft x 10.50 ft (normal load)
25.00 m / 25.00 m x 4.00 m x 3.20 m
2 - 19.7" / 500 mm above water torpedoes, 2 - 19.7" / 500 mm submerged torpedo tubes

Machinery:
Diesel Internal combustion generators,
Electric motors, 1 shaft, 150 shp / 112 Kw = 10.32 kts
Range 1,800nm at 10.32 kts
Bunker at max displacement = 16 tons

Complement:
9 - 13

Cost:
£0.026 million / $0.105 million

Distribution of weights at normal displacement:
Armament: 0 tons, 0.0 %
Machinery: 4 tons, 3.1 %
Hull, fittings & equipment: 94 tons, 68.6 %
Fuel, ammunition & stores: 12 tons, 8.6 %
Miscellaneous weights: 27 tons, 19.7 %

Overall survivability and seakeeping ability:
Survivability (Non-critical penetrating hits needed to sink ship):
46 lbs / 21 Kg = 0.4 x 6 " / 152 mm shells or 0.1 torpedoes
Stability (Unstable if below 1.00): 1.00
Metacentric height 0.2 ft / 0.1 m
Roll period: 11.3 seconds
Steadiness - As gun platform (Average = 50 %): 0 %
- Recoil effect (Restricted arc if above 1.00): 0.00
Seaboat quality (Average = 1.00): 0.00

Hull form characteristics:
Hull has a flush deck
Block coefficient: 0.424
Length to Beam Ratio: 6.25 : 1
'Natural speed' for length: 9.06 kts
Power going to wave formation at top speed: 49 %
Trim (Max stability = 0, Max steadiness = 100): 50
Bow angle (Positive = bow angles forward): 0.00 degrees
Stern overhang: 0.00 ft / 0.00 m
Freeboard (% = measuring location as a percentage of overall length):
- Stem: 0.00 ft / 0.00 m
- Forecastle (20 %): 0.00 ft / 0.00 m
- Mid (50 %): 0.00 ft / 0.00 m
- Quarterdeck (15 %): 0.00 ft / 0.00 m
- Stern: 0.00 ft / 0.00 m
- Average freeboard: 0.00 ft / 0.00 m
Ship tends to be wet forward

Ship space, strength and comments:
Space - Hull below water (magazines/engines, low = better): 122.7 %
- Above water (accommodation/working, high = better): 0.0 %
Waterplane Area: 639 Square feet or 59 Square metres
Displacement factor (Displacement / loading): 387 %
Structure weight / hull surface area: 82 lbs/sq ft or 401 Kg/sq metre
Hull strength (Relative):
- Cross-sectional: 4.16
- Longitudinal: 9.55
- Overall: 4.52
Hull space for machinery, storage, compartmentation is cramped
Room for accommodation and workspaces is extremely poor

This post has been edited 3 times, last edit by "Carthaginian" (Apr 25th 2008, 12:39am)


2

Friday, April 25th 2008, 12:33am

Hey, that doesn't look half bad... Decent dive depth, size, etc...

I would be shocked if you got an 8-man crew to reload torpedoes, though...

3

Friday, April 25th 2008, 12:35am

Quoted

Originally posted by Brockpaine
Hey, that doesn't look half bad... Decent dive depth, size, etc...

I would be shocked if you got an 8-man crew to reload torpedoes, though...


Well, it's not like they'd be doing it during a battle (they hope). If people think I can cram 13 men on her, then I'll add that many. The crew requirements were '19-26 men', half that is 9-13. Also, the dive depth would only be about half that... I think that 135m is a bit excessive for a ship like this.

This post has been edited 3 times, last edit by "Carthaginian" (Apr 25th 2008, 12:38am)


4

Friday, April 25th 2008, 1:39am

Me gusta! Mexico wonders if perhaps Siam wishes to exchange the plans for those, for the plans of the nice Mexican TBs.

5

Friday, April 25th 2008, 2:28am

Quoted

Originally posted by Desertfox
Me gusta! Mexico wonders if perhaps Siam wishes to exchange the plans for those, for the plans of the nice Mexican TBs.


:D Glad you like!
Siam has a counteroffer they will communicate to Mexico.
Should this be found acceptable, the trade can take place for Q2/36.