You are not logged in.

Woud this be correct?

Vukovlad

Me too !!!

Posts: 4,137

  • Send private message

1

Wednesday, January 30th 2008, 9:07pm

Woud this be correct?

Industrial Allocation

3 factory allocated to production of warship materials for
3000 Tons

Transactions
3000 Ton transfered to China

Updated Order of Battle, End of 1935

Completed (Under Repair or Refit) + Under Construction

Light Cruisers: 2(0) + 0
Gunships: 2(0) + 0
Gunboats: 2(0) + 0
Torpedo Boats: 12(0) + 0
Minesweepers: 6(0) + 0
Motor Torpedo Boats: 2(0) + 0
Submarine Chasers: 6(0)+0
Patrol Boats: 10(0) + 0
Tenders: 2(0)+0

Would this be a correct ?

This post has been edited 1 times, last edit by "Vukovlad" (Jan 30th 2008, 9:08pm)

thesmilingassassin

The Chosen One

Posts: 13,513

  • Send private message

2

Wednesday, January 30th 2008, 9:31pm

This is for Persia correct?

Vukovlad

Me too !!!

Posts: 4,137

  • Send private message

3

Wednesday, January 30th 2008, 9:43pm

Yes

thesmilingassassin

The Chosen One

Posts: 13,513

  • Send private message

4

Thursday, January 31st 2008, 1:08am

Seems ok, is the transfer of 3000 tons a SATSUMA arangment or for ships on order from China?

Vukovlad

Me too !!!

Posts: 4,137

  • Send private message

5

Thursday, January 31st 2008, 1:29am

Does it matter?

Hrolf Hakonson

Scooby-Doo

Posts: 6,178

  • Send private message

6

Thursday, January 31st 2008, 1:41am

In terms of the turn output, not really, though usually it' noted what a payment like that is for.

Vukovlad

Me too !!!

Posts: 4,137

  • Send private message

7

Thursday, January 31st 2008, 1:47am

This is more to see if i understood the principle, would Land and Air equipment purchases also be noted here?

Hrolf Hakonson

Scooby-Doo

Posts: 6,178

  • Send private message

8

Thursday, January 31st 2008, 1:53am

They could be, though they're not usually (since they don't have to be paid for using factory output).

thesmilingassassin

The Chosen One

Posts: 13,513

  • Send private message

9

Thursday, January 31st 2008, 2:22am

If you are transfering tonnage to another nation it is nice to know where its going. Given the size of the Persian report, a lttle more detail might spice it up.

parador

Sage

Posts: 3,829

  • Send private message

10

Thursday, January 31st 2008, 8:44am

Yes some more details would be nice. Of course it doesn't matter what the transfered tonnage is for, but it's an unwritten law to write it down ;)

New:
That's what i said ;). It's an unwritten law, to write in the report, what are the tonnage is for.

This post has been edited 1 times, last edit by "parador" (Jan 31st 2008, 5:21pm)

thesmilingassassin

The Chosen One

Posts: 13,513

  • Send private message

11

Thursday, January 31st 2008, 5:15pm

Well not really, I just think it adds a bit more info to an otherwise short report. That said the loooooong Atlantean reports have lots of useless info in them.