Dear visitor, welcome to WesWorld. If this is your first visit here, please read the Help. It explains in detail how this page works. To use all features of this page, you should consider registering. Please use the registration form, to register here or read more information about the registration process. If you are already registered, please login here.
Quoted
Originally posted by thesmilingassassin
Atlantis would certainly review its own arangements with the SAE, NATO, FAR ect as a result of the SEAR treaty and the SAE's bewildering gravitation towards SATSUMA. SAE membership in SATSUMA would almost certainly scuttle the non-agression pact, considering it was a pain to refrain from taking sides in the South American war.
Quoted
Originally posted by HoOmAn
And why on Earth is Canada with SEAR?!?! Have they gained possession in the region lately? Have I missed something while I moved?
Quoted
Originally posted by thesmilingassassin
I could say the same about the U.S. Why are they NOT in SEAR? Rather moot point anyway as I'm glad they are not, that would DEFINATELY be one sided.
Quoted
Originally posted by thesmilingassassin
NATO is in the Atlantic
Quoted
Originally posted by ShinRa_Inc
Quoted
Originally posted by thesmilingassassin
NATO is in the Atlantic
More like Western Atlantic/Eastern Pacific.
SEAR seems more like a mutual "If SATSUMA swats at us, we clobber back" agreement. NATO and even SATSUMA itself have more meat to them.
Quoted
Originally posted by Hood
The Suez Canal is much nearer the likely warzone than the Panama and can go round any RSAN blockade.
This post has been edited 2 times, last edit by "Earl822" (Jan 27th 2008, 4:03pm)
Quoted
SEAR is not a 1930's alliance, it is from the 50's & 60's and reminds me of the time when Lady Green pointed out to the sim that our politics were from the wrong era.
Quoted
That and we have a great lack of bad guys. Hitler's dead, Stalin's dead, everyone wants to be the good guys...
Forum Software: Burning Board® Lite 2.1.2 pl 1, developed by WoltLab® GmbH