You are not logged in.

Dear visitor, welcome to WesWorld. If this is your first visit here, please read the Help. It explains in detail how this page works. To use all features of this page, you should consider registering. Please use the registration form, to register here or read more information about the registration process. If you are already registered, please login here.

1

Thursday, May 15th 2003, 2:23am

Saved thread - this is tribal class DDs what do think off them blokes

17inc
Spammer wanna be
Posts: 24
(4/25/03 1:32:11 am)
this is tribal class DDs what do think off them blokes
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
this is my tribal class DDs there will be ten start with to repalce my 1918 Adymiraity M class by the mid to late 1930s




Source code

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
Tribal calss, Austrlian Destroyer laid down 1937

Displacement:
        2,026 t light; 2,096 t standard; 2,316 t normal; 2,483 t full load
        Loading submergence 282 tons/feet

Dimensions:
        355.50 ft x 37.50 ft x 9.50 ft (normal load)

Armament:
        8 - 4 " (102 mm) (4 Main turrets x 2 guns)
        10 - 1.5 " (38 mm) AA
        12 - 0.8 " (20 mm)
        Weight of broadside 276 lbs (125 kg)
        4 - 21 " above water torpedoes

Machinery:
        63,091 shp steam turbines, oil fired boilers = 34.00 kts, range 4,100nm at 15.00 kts

Complement:
        166 - 216

Cost:
        £1.572 million / $6.289 million

Distribution of weights at normal displacement:
        Armament: 34 tons, 1.5 %
        Machinery: 1,346 tons, 58.1 %
        Hull, fittings & equipment: 646 tons, 27.9 %
        Fuel, ammunition & stores: 289 tons, 12.5 %
        Miscellaneous weights: 0 tons, 0.0 %

        Metacentric height 1.5

Remarks:
        Caution: Hull subject to strain in open-sea
        Hull space for machinery, storage & compartmentation is cramped
        Room for accommodation & workspaces is excellent
        Ship has slow, easy roll, a good, steady gun platform

Estimated overall survivability and seakeeping ability:
        Relative margin of stability: 1.14
        Shellfire needed to sink: 595 lbs = 18.6 x 4.0 " shells
        (Approx weight of penetrating shell hits needed to sink ship excluding critical hits)
        Torpedoes needed to sink: 0.3
        (Approx number of typical torpedo hits needed to sink ship)
        Relative steadiness as gun platform: 91 %
        (Average = 50 %)
        Relative rocking effect from firing to beam: 0.68
        Relative quality as seaboat: 1.18

Hull form characteristics:
        Block coefficient: 0.64
        Sharpness coefficient: 0.38
        Hull speed coefficient 'M': 8.21
        'Natural speed' for length: 18.85 kts
        Power going to wave formation at top speed: 73 %
        Trim: 77
        (Maximise stabilty/flotation = 0, Maximise steadiness/seakeeping = 100)

Estimated hull characteristics & strength:
        Underwater volume absorbed by magazines and engineering spaces: 198.8 %
        Relative accommodation and working space: 198.0 %
        (Average = 100%)
        Displacement factor: 61 %
        (Displacement relative to loading factors)
        Relative cross-sectional hull strength: 0.45
        (Structure weight per square foot of hull surface: 36 lbs)
        Relative longitudinal hull strength: 1.76
        (for 22.00 ft average freeboard, freeboard adjustment 10.70 ft)
        Relative composite hull strength: 0.52


The Rock Doctor
Spammer wanna be
Posts: 50
(4/25/03 11:52:13 am)
Questionnes
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-Are two turrets superfiring?

-Why no gun shields?

-Are you satisfied with the range of 4100 nm? It seems a little short to me.

-Steadiness and freeboard seem rather high; cutting back on them might increase the amount of damage the ship can suck up.