Siam thanks all those who submitted designs, and has carefully considered all of the proposals.
The Canadian proposal was rejected at an early stage, because although it is...technologically innovative...it is not particulary suited to the requirement, for a vessel to familiarise Siamese crews with the operation of lighter-than-air craft. However, the Siamese government would be very interested in negiotiations with Canada for the supply of helium...
Norge was considered to be sutible with regards to size or performance, however the lack of a proper interior hangar was a black mark, and there were concerns voiced over the possible fatigue implications of her earlier exploratory voyages.
The U.S. semi-rigid design was also removed from consideration due to hangerage concerns, and also the stated preferance for a "proper" rigid design.
The United Kingdom proposal was given high marks on merit and experience, and the reduced flammability of its diesel motors vis-a-vis gasoline was a major strong point. However the Royal Siamese Air Force has a strong stated preference for an interior hangar, which will most likely be featured on future, larger designs, to ensure the most complete training for its pilots. The UK is heartily encouraged to submit a design when the next RfP is issued in a few years, however.
This left the Australian, Goodyear-Zeppelin and Atlantean submissions on the short-list, and arguments were held long and loud on the merits and dismerits of the three designs. However in the end, a selection was made, and the Royal Siamese Air Force would like to issue a contract to the Atlantian government for the construction of one (1) zeppelin, to be named Bangkok.