You are not logged in.

Dear visitor, welcome to WesWorld. If this is your first visit here, please read the Help. It explains in detail how this page works. To use all features of this page, you should consider registering. Please use the registration form, to register here or read more information about the registration process. If you are already registered, please login here.

1

Thursday, May 15th 2003, 1:17am

Saved thread - ok this is a cheap escort ship for sale built by au yra

17inc
Spammer wanna be
Posts: 10
(4/22/03 5:31:21 am)
ok this is a cheap escort ship for sale built by au yrads
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
this is a cheap Escort ship that will come on the market for those that that need to escort but don't have the time or PTs to build any your self

Source code

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
Hero class, Royal Australian Navy Corvet laid down 1935

Displacement:
        840 t light; 864 t standard; 960 t normal; 1,033 t full load
        Loading submergence 101 tons/feet

Dimensions:
        188.00 ft x 25.00 ft x 11.00 ft (normal load)

Armament:
        3 - 3 " (76 mm) (2 Main turrets)
        7 - 1.56 " (40 mm) AA
        10 - 0.8 " (20 mm)
        Weight of broadside 56 lbs (26 kg)

Machinery:
        2,740 shp steam turbines, oil fired boilers = 17.00 kts, range 7,900nm at 10.00 kts

Complement:
        86 - 112

Cost:
        £0.235 million / $0.941 million

Distribution of weights at normal displacement:
        Armament: 7 tons, 0.7 %
        Machinery: 78 tons, 8.1 %
        Hull, fittings & equipment: 705 tons, 73.5 %
        Fuel, ammunition & stores: 120 tons, 12.5 %
        Miscellaneous weights: 50 tons, 5.2 %

        Metacentric height 0.7

Remarks:
        Hull space for machinery, storage & compartmentation is excellent
        Room for accommodation & workspaces is cramped
        Poor seaboat, wet and uncomfortable, reduced performance in heavy weather

Estimated overall survivability and seakeeping ability:
        Relative margin of stability: 1.10
        Shellfire needed to sink: 2,568 lbs = 190.2 x 3.0 " shells
        (Approx weight of penetrating shell hits needed to sink ship excluding critical hits)
        Torpedoes needed to sink: 1.7
        (Approx number of typical torpedo hits needed to sink ship)
        Relative steadiness as gun platform: 37 %
        (Average = 50 %)
        Relative rocking effect from firing to beam: 0.19
        Relative quality as seaboat: 0.78

Hull form characteristics:
        Block coefficient: 0.65
        Sharpness coefficient: 0.42
        Hull speed coefficient 'M': 5.82
        'Natural speed' for length: 13.71 kts
        Power going to wave formation at top speed: 60 %
        Trim: 35
        (Maximise stabilty/flotation = 0, Maximise steadiness/seakeeping = 100)

Estimated hull characteristics & strength:
        Underwater volume absorbed by magazines and engineering spaces: 39.1 %
        Relative accommodation and working space: 73.9 %
        (Average = 100%)
        Displacement factor: 366 %
        (Displacement relative to loading factors)
        Relative cross-sectional hull strength: 2.78
        (Structure weight per square foot of hull surface: 116 lbs)
        Relative longitudinal hull strength: 7.37
        (for 9.48 ft average freeboard)
        Relative composite hull strength: 3.07


King of Riva
Spammer wanna be
Posts: 52
(4/22/03 12:22:17 pm)
1935?!?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Could someone please explain this guy one thing: It is 1920 (November to be exactly) sim-time!

Rooijen10
Spammer wanna be
Posts: 82
(4/22/03 12:58:47 pm)
Re: 1935?!?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"this is a cheap Escort ship that will come on the market"

May I point out to you King the word "will", meaning they still have to be constructed. I did the same with my still to be constructed battleships (1923), carriers (1924) and cruisers (1926, 1927, 1928) since I have no fixed date for these ships. The dates were determined by a simple test run.
... but 1935 is pretty far away...
... and having used this data with Springstyle, I have found out that the design is actually better suited for 1920 than 1935.

Walter