You are not logged in.

Dear visitor, welcome to WesWorld. If this is your first visit here, please read the Help. It explains in detail how this page works. To use all features of this page, you should consider registering. Please use the registration form, to register here or read more information about the registration process. If you are already registered, please login here.

HoOmAn

Keeper of the Sacred Block Coefficient

  • Send private message

1

Friday, April 7th 2006, 12:10pm

New RSAN designs for 1930

Small Craft:

UJ Series 30, ASW Launch laid down 1930

Displacement:
196 t light; 204 t standard; 231 t normal; 253 t full load

Dimensions: Length overall / water x beam x draught
144,24 ft / 137,80 ft x 19,03 ft x 6,56 ft (normal load)
43,97 m / 42,00 m x 5,80 m x 2,00 m

Armament:
1 - 3,46" / 88,0 mm guns in single mounts, 20,79lbs / 9,43kg shells, 1930 Model
Breech loading gun in deck mount
on centreline forward
2 - 1,57" / 40,0 mm guns (1x2 guns), 1,95lbs / 0,88kg shells, 1930 Model
Anti-aircraft guns in deck mount
on centreline aft
2 - 0,79" / 20,0 mm guns in single mounts, 0,24lbs / 0,11kg shells, 1930 Model
Anti-aircraft guns in deck mounts
on side, evenly spread
Weight of broadside 25 lbs / 11 kg
Shells per gun, main battery: 200

Armour:
- Gun armour: Face (max) Other gunhouse (avg) Barbette/hoist (max)
Main: 0,79" / 20 mm - -
2nd: 0,59" / 15 mm - -
3rd: 0,39" / 10 mm - -

Machinery:
Diesel Internal combustion motors,
Geared drive, 2 shafts, 2.392 shp / 1.784 Kw = 19,95 kts
Range 3.000nm at 12,00 kts
Bunker at max displacement = 48 tons

Complement:
29 - 38

Cost:
£0,082 million / $0,329 million

Distribution of weights at normal displacement:
Armament: 3 tons, 1,4%
Armour: 2 tons, 0,8%
- Belts: 0 tons, 0,0%
- Torpedo bulkhead: 0 tons, 0,0%
- Armament: 2 tons, 0,8%
- Armour Deck: 0 tons, 0,0%
- Conning Tower: 0 tons, 0,0%
Machinery: 72 tons, 31,4%
Hull, fittings & equipment: 94 tons, 40,7%
Fuel, ammunition & stores: 35 tons, 15,0%
Miscellaneous weights: 25 tons, 10,8%

Overall survivability and seakeeping ability:
Survivability (Non-critical penetrating hits needed to sink ship):
209 lbs / 95 Kg = 10,0 x 3,5 " / 88 mm shells or 0,2 torpedoes
Stability (Unstable if below 1.00): 1,14
Metacentric height 0,5 ft / 0,2 m
Roll period: 10,9 seconds
Steadiness - As gun platform (Average = 50 %): 55 %
- Recoil effect (Restricted arc if above 1.00): 0,20
Seaboat quality (Average = 1.00): 1,90

Hull form characteristics:
Hull has rise forward of midbreak
Block coefficient: 0,470
Length to Beam Ratio: 7,24 : 1
'Natural speed' for length: 11,74 kts
Power going to wave formation at top speed: 70 %
Trim (Max stability = 0, Max steadiness = 100): 29
Bow angle (Positive = bow angles forward): 20,00 degrees
Stern overhang: 0,00 ft / 0,00 m
Freeboard (% = measuring location as a percentage of overall length):
- Stem: 17,72 ft / 5,40 m
- Forecastle (20%): 15,75 ft / 4,80 m
- Mid (50%): 15,75 ft / 4,80 m (7,87 ft / 2,40 m aft of break)
- Quarterdeck (15%): 7,87 ft / 2,40 m
- Stern: 7,87 ft / 2,40 m
- Average freeboard: 11,97 ft / 3,65 m

Ship space, strength and comments:
Space - Hull below water (magazines/engines, low = better): 124,5%
- Above water (accommodation/working, high = better): 128,6%
Waterplane Area: 1.701 Square feet or 158 Square metres
Displacement factor (Displacement / loading): 117%
Structure weight / hull surface area: 20 lbs/sq ft or 96 Kg/sq metre
Hull strength (Relative):
- Cross-sectional: 0,55
- Longitudinal: 15,47
- Overall: 0,77
Caution: Hull subject to strain in open-sea
Hull space for machinery, storage, compartmentation is cramped
Room for accommodation and workspaces is excellent
Excellent seaboat, comfortable, can fire her guns in the heaviest weather


Escorts:

DD30-1600, Destroyer laid down 1930

Displacement:
1.595 t light; 1.670 t standard; 1.910 t normal; 2.103 t full load

Dimensions: Length overall / water x beam x draught
374,94 ft / 359,25 ft x 36,09 ft x 13,22 ft (normal load)
114,28 m / 109,50 m x 11,00 m x 4,03 m

Armament:
5 - 5,00" / 127 mm guns in single mounts, 62,50lbs / 28,35kg shells, 1930 Model
Breech loading guns in deck mounts
on centreline ends, majority forward, 2 raised mounts - superfiring
4 - 1,57" / 40,0 mm guns (2x2 guns), 1,95lbs / 0,88kg shells, 1930 Model
Anti-aircraft guns in deck mounts
on side, all amidships
4 - 0,79" / 20,0 mm guns in single mounts, 0,24lbs / 0,11kg shells, 1930 Model
Anti-aircraft guns in deck mounts
on side, evenly spread
Weight of broadside 321 lbs / 146 kg
Shells per gun, main battery: 200
8 - 21,0" / 533 mm above water torpedoes

Armour:
- Gun armour: Face (max) Other gunhouse (avg) Barbette/hoist (max)
Main: 0,79" / 20 mm 0,39" / 10 mm -
2nd: 0,59" / 15 mm - -
3rd: 0,39" / 10 mm - -

Machinery:
Oil fired boilers, steam turbines,
Geared drive, 2 shafts, 44.000 shp / 32.824 Kw = 35,13 kts
Range 5.350nm at 15,00 kts
Bunker at max displacement = 433 tons

Complement:
143 - 187

Cost:
£0,964 million / $3,856 million

Distribution of weights at normal displacement:
Armament: 40 tons, 2,1%
Armour: 11 tons, 0,6%
- Belts: 0 tons, 0,0%
- Torpedo bulkhead: 0 tons, 0,0%
- Armament: 11 tons, 0,6%
- Armour Deck: 0 tons, 0,0%
- Conning Tower: 0 tons, 0,0%
Machinery: 1.007 tons, 52,7%
Hull, fittings & equipment: 527 tons, 27,6%
Fuel, ammunition & stores: 315 tons, 16,5%
Miscellaneous weights: 10 tons, 0,5%

Overall survivability and seakeeping ability:
Survivability (Non-critical penetrating hits needed to sink ship):
446 lbs / 202 Kg = 7,1 x 5,0 " / 127 mm shells or 0,3 torpedoes
Stability (Unstable if below 1.00): 1,37
Metacentric height 1,9 ft / 0,6 m
Roll period: 11,1 seconds
Steadiness - As gun platform (Average = 50 %): 70 %
- Recoil effect (Restricted arc if above 1.00): 0,19
Seaboat quality (Average = 1.00): 1,00

Hull form characteristics:
Hull has raised forecastle
and transom stern
Block coefficient: 0,390
Length to Beam Ratio: 9,95 : 1
'Natural speed' for length: 21,97 kts
Power going to wave formation at top speed: 68 %
Trim (Max stability = 0, Max steadiness = 100): 70
Bow angle (Positive = bow angles forward): 32,00 degrees
Stern overhang: 0,00 ft / 0,00 m
Freeboard (% = measuring location as a percentage of overall length):
- Stem: 25,10 ft / 7,65 m
- Forecastle (37%): 19,69 ft / 6,00 m (11,81 ft / 3,60 m aft of break)
- Mid (50%): 11,81 ft / 3,60 m
- Quarterdeck (15%): 11,81 ft / 3,60 m
- Stern: 11,81 ft / 3,60 m
- Average freeboard: 15,53 ft / 4,73 m

Ship space, strength and comments:
Space - Hull below water (magazines/engines, low = better): 187,3%
- Above water (accommodation/working, high = better): 74,6%
Waterplane Area: 8.238 Square feet or 765 Square metres
Displacement factor (Displacement / loading): 63%
Structure weight / hull surface area: 33 lbs/sq ft or 161 Kg/sq metre
Hull strength (Relative):
- Cross-sectional: 0,50
- Longitudinal: 1,99
- Overall: 0,57
Hull space for machinery, storage, compartmentation is cramped
Room for accommodation and workspaces is cramped
Ship has slow, easy roll, a good, steady gun platform


Leader:

Wulf-class, Destroyer Leader laid down 1930


Displacement:
2.618 t light; 2.764 t standard; 3.127 t normal; 3.418 t full load

Dimensions: Length overall / water x beam x draught
457,25 ft / 442,91 ft x 45,93 ft x 13,12 ft (normal load)
139,37 m / 135,00 m x 14,00 m x 4,00 m

Armament:
6 - 5,31" / 135 mm guns (3x2 guns), 75,07lbs / 34,05kg shells, 1930 Model
Breech loading guns in turrets (on barbettes)
on centreline ends, majority forward, 1 raised mount - superfiring
4 - 3,46" / 88,0 mm guns (2x2 guns), 20,79lbs / 9,43kg shells, 1930 Model
Dual purpose guns in deck mounts
on side, all amidships
12 - 1,57" / 40,0 mm guns (4x3 guns), 1,95lbs / 0,89kg shells, 1930 Model
Dual purpose guns in deck mounts
on side ends, evenly spread
10 - 0,79" / 20,0 mm guns (3 mounts), 0,24lbs / 0,11kg shells, 1930 Model
Breech loading guns in deck mounts
on side, evenly spread
Weight of broadside 559 lbs / 254 kg
Shells per gun, main battery: 250
8 - 21,0" / 533 mm above water torpedoes

Armour:
- Gun armour: Face (max) Other gunhouse (avg) Barbette/hoist (max)
Main: 1,38" / 35 mm 0,79" / 20 mm 1,18" / 30 mm
2nd: 0,98" / 25 mm 0,59" / 15 mm -
3rd: 0,59" / 15 mm - -
4th: 0,39" / 10 mm - -

- Armour deck: 0,39" / 10 mm

Machinery:
Oil fired boilers, steam turbines,
Geared drive, 2 shafts, 50.938 shp / 38.000 Kw = 34,46 kts
Range 6.000nm at 15,00 kts
Bunker at max displacement = 654 tons

Complement:
208 - 271

Cost:
£1,466 million / $5,864 million

Distribution of weights at normal displacement:
Armament: 70 tons, 2,2%
Armour: 159 tons, 5,1%
- Belts: 0 tons, 0,0%
- Torpedo bulkhead: 0 tons, 0,0%
- Armament: 63 tons, 2,0%
- Armour Deck: 95 tons, 3,0%
- Conning Tower: 0 tons, 0,0%
Machinery: 1.430 tons, 45,7%
Hull, fittings & equipment: 929 tons, 29,7%
Fuel, ammunition & stores: 510 tons, 16,3%
Miscellaneous weights: 30 tons, 1,0%

Overall survivability and seakeeping ability:
Survivability (Non-critical penetrating hits needed to sink ship):
1.037 lbs / 471 Kg = 13,8 x 5,3 " / 135 mm shells or 0,5 torpedoes
Stability (Unstable if below 1.00): 1,28
Metacentric height 2,4 ft / 0,7 m
Roll period: 12,4 seconds
Steadiness - As gun platform (Average = 50 %): 70 %
- Recoil effect (Restricted arc if above 1.00): 0,37
Seaboat quality (Average = 1.00): 1,01

Hull form characteristics:
Hull has rise forward of midbreak
and transom stern
Block coefficient: 0,410
Length to Beam Ratio: 9,64 : 1
'Natural speed' for length: 24,38 kts
Power going to wave formation at top speed: 64 %
Trim (Max stability = 0, Max steadiness = 100): 69
Bow angle (Positive = bow angles forward): 25,00 degrees
Stern overhang: 1,64 ft / 0,50 m
Freeboard (% = measuring location as a percentage of overall length):
- Stem: 27,23 ft / 8,30 m
- Forecastle (20%): 20,01 ft / 6,10 m
- Mid (60%): 20,01 ft / 6,10 m (11,81 ft / 3,60 m aft of break)
- Quarterdeck (15%): 11,81 ft / 3,60 m
- Stern: 11,81 ft / 3,60 m
- Average freeboard: 17,31 ft / 5,28 m

Ship space, strength and comments:
Space - Hull below water (magazines/engines, low = better): 167,1%
- Above water (accommodation/working, high = better): 147,3%
Waterplane Area: 13.077 Square feet or 1.215 Square metres
Displacement factor (Displacement / loading): 82%
Structure weight / hull surface area: 43 lbs/sq ft or 209 Kg/sq metre
Hull strength (Relative):
- Cross-sectional: 0,50
- Longitudinal: 1,21
- Overall: 0,54
Hull space for machinery, storage, compartmentation is cramped
Room for accommodation and workspaces is excellent
Ship has slow, easy roll, a good, steady gun platform


Carrier:

Anvil-class, Fleetcarrier laid down 1930


Displacement:
13.507 t light; 13.915 t standard; 15.966 t normal; 17.607 t full load

Dimensions: Length overall / water x beam x draught
721,75 ft / 705,38 ft x 75,46 ft x 21,00 ft (normal load)
219,99 m / 215,00 m x 23,00 m x 6,40 m

Armament:
16 - 4,53" / 115 mm guns (8x2 guns), 46,40lbs / 21,05kg shells, 1930 Model
Breech loading guns in deck mounts with hoists
on side ends, evenly spread, all raised mounts - superfiring
16 - 1,57" / 40,0 mm guns (4x4 guns), 1,95lbs / 0,88kg shells, 1930 Model
Breech loading guns in deck mounts
on side, evenly spread, all raised mounts
20 - 0,79" / 20,0 mm guns (6 mounts), 0,24lbs / 0,11kg shells, 1930 Model
Breech loading guns in deck mounts
on side, evenly spread, all raised guns
Weight of broadside 778 lbs / 353 kg
Shells per gun, main battery: 200

Airgroup: 70 planes of WW2-vintage

Armour:
- Gun armour: Face (max) Other gunhouse (avg) Barbette/hoist (max)
Main: 0,98" / 25 mm 0,39" / 10 mm -
3rd: 0,59" / 15 mm - -
4th: 0,39" / 10 mm - -

- Armour deck: 0,79" / 20 mm

Machinery:
Oil fired boilers, steam turbines,
Geared drive, 4 shafts, 84.000 shp / 62.664 Kw = 30,12 kts
Range 12.000nm at 15,00 kts
Bunker at max displacement = 3.692 tons

Complement:
709 - 923

Cost:
£3,809 million / $15,236 million

Distribution of weights at normal displacement:
Armament: 97 tons, 0,6%
Armour: 550 tons, 3,4%
- Belts: 0 tons, 0,0%
- Torpedo bulkhead: 0 tons, 0,0%
- Armament: 33 tons, 0,2%
- Armour Deck: 517 tons, 3,2%
- Conning Tower: 0 tons, 0,0%
Machinery: 2.545 tons, 15,9%
Hull, fittings & equipment: 5.414 tons, 33,9%
Fuel, ammunition & stores: 2.460 tons, 15,4%
Miscellaneous weights: 4.900 tons, 30,7%

Overall survivability and seakeeping ability:
Survivability (Non-critical penetrating hits needed to sink ship):
21.309 lbs / 9.666 Kg = 459,2 x 4,5 " / 115 mm shells or 2,3 torpedoes
Stability (Unstable if below 1.00): 1,09
Metacentric height 3,9 ft / 1,2 m
Roll period: 16,1 seconds
Steadiness - As gun platform (Average = 50 %): 70 %
- Recoil effect (Restricted arc if above 1.00): 0,13
Seaboat quality (Average = 1.00): 1,41

Hull form characteristics:
Hull has a flush deck
Block coefficient: 0,500
Length to Beam Ratio: 9,35 : 1
'Natural speed' for length: 26,56 kts
Power going to wave formation at top speed: 49 %
Trim (Max stability = 0, Max steadiness = 100): 50
Bow angle (Positive = bow angles forward): 22,00 degrees
Stern overhang: 6,56 ft / 2,00 m
Freeboard (% = measuring location as a percentage of overall length):
- Stem: 24,28 ft / 7,40 m
- Forecastle (20%): 20,83 ft / 6,35 m
- Mid (50%): 20,83 ft / 6,35 m
- Quarterdeck (15%): 20,83 ft / 6,35 m
- Stern: 20,83 ft / 6,35 m
- Average freeboard: 21,11 ft / 6,43 m
Ship tends to be wet forward

Ship space, strength and comments:
Space - Hull below water (magazines/engines, low = better): 90,4%
- Above water (accommodation/working, high = better): 198,5%
Waterplane Area: 35.464 Square feet or 3.295 Square metres
Displacement factor (Displacement / loading): 141%
Structure weight / hull surface area: 104 lbs/sq ft or 506 Kg/sq metre
Hull strength (Relative):
- Cross-sectional: 0,99
- Longitudinal: 1,00
- Overall: 1,00
Hull space for machinery, storage, compartmentation is adequate
Room for accommodation and workspaces is excellent
Ship has slow, easy roll, a good, steady gun platform
Good seaboat, rides out heavy weather easily

2

Friday, April 7th 2006, 12:20pm

Heh, Wulf, and it's Japanese copy, looks kind of like the ZL-100 design I did. Convergent evolution strikes again....
What's the point of the 10mm deck? Prevent strafing fighters from damaging the ship? Given angle of incidence and the kinds of fuzes normally used on aircraft cannon, that wasn't (historically) much of a problem....


On the Anvil class. nice job shoe-horning that much aircraft space onto a tiny amount of tonnage. But I have to wonder about the complete lack of armor on the design. A single destroyer could very badly damage this ship, and while it's AA battery is pretty solid, relatively small bombs will go right through a 20mm deck. Torpedos or mines are also not this ship's friend.

HoOmAn

Keeper of the Sacred Block Coefficient

  • Send private message

3

Friday, April 7th 2006, 1:04pm



Actually the DL30-class is one of my oldest (above with the original name), done years ago (then with a 133mm gun). The Japanese asked for a licence to build their own...and the RSAN could always make good use of some "money".

The 10mm deck is there to provide more strength should the ship blow through some heavier seas at high speed. It´s not there for protection even though it might help against straffing planes or splinters. Keep in mind that at the time the ship was designed and will be build CANNONs are still rare as plane armament. And a 7,92mm or 12,7mm bullet won´t go through it.

The ANVIL is a small fleet carrier for sure. I expect her to be too small actually - but that´s an experience the RSAN yet has to gain. There´s not much armor because RSAN designers (hey, that´s me!) don´t expect her to go through much gun fight. And against air threats her large air group will help. The 20mm deck is the hangar deck, offering more strength than protection but might help to keep the splinters away from important areas. In fact I envision the total weight of her armor to be destributed as armored boxes around her magazins and as a local protection layer above boilers and turbines.

Finally, there´s no ship that is friend to mines and torpedos, isn´t there?

4

Friday, April 7th 2006, 1:07pm

Alioth is 500 tons lighter than Anvil and only ships 55 aircraft, I think 70 is a highly optimistic number.

I assume the 4.53" are DP?

5

Friday, April 7th 2006, 2:36pm

Interesting.

Its amazing how similar the destroyer leader is to one of my designs for 1931. Completely different mission, but similar hull and stats.



Why is the RSAN introducing 135mm and 115mm guns when they already have 127mm and 105mm?

Anvil will be horribly cramped with 70 aircraft onboard. She is like one of the Colossus but with about twice as many aircraft and heavy AA guns. I can't see the design being a success and will probably end up like USS Ranger.

6

Friday, April 7th 2006, 3:08pm

Quoted

Actually the DL30-class is one of my oldest (above with the original name), done years ago (then with a 133mm gun).


Heh, convergent evolution going the other way, then. ;)

Quoted

The ANVIL is a small fleet carrier for sure. I expect her to be too small actually - but that´s an experience the RSAN yet has to gain. There´s not much armor because RSAN designers (hey, that´s me!) don´t expect her to go through much gun fight. And against air threats her large air group will help.


True, a large airgroup is an advantage. I'm just a little surprised at such a large ship being so poorly armored at this time period, when we still are seeing the US fleet carriers armed with 6" or 8" guns.

Quoted

Why is the RSAN introducing 135mm and 115mm guns when they already have 127mm and 105mm?


A question I was wondering myself.

Quoted

Finally, there´s no ship that is friend to mines and torpedos, isn´t there?


Well, not many, no, but some ships are more resistant than others. This one is less resistant than most ships of her displacement.

HoOmAn

Keeper of the Sacred Block Coefficient

  • Send private message

7

Friday, April 7th 2006, 4:59pm

On guns

Why not introducing a 115mm gun?

So far the RSAN fields

- a 105mm which will be too light as main gun for destroyer+ sized ships and too weak as heavy AA gun on capital ships in the long run

- a 127mm gun as main armament for DDs and similar sized/secondary warships but those are LA mounts only

- a 150mm gun wich is too heavy to be man handled for sustained fire as it is necessary for AAA or as main armament for DL size warships

So I introduced two new calibers that merge these three guns into two. Btw, the DL28 already features the 115mm gun but in a LA mount while newer ships will get the gun for DP use. The 135mm gun will be used as main or secondary battery, depending on the vessel it is used on and either in LA or DP mounts. The 135mm is about the heaviest which can be man handled, methinks based on French OTL experience with 130mm guns, but most mounts will be powered anyway.

So I can easily see a reason to introduce new calibers.

As I already said I expect the RSAN to learn 70 planes is too much for a 14kts carrier. I can see the use of about 45-50 planes per ship once this lesson is learned, probably with another half douzand in crates.

8

Friday, April 7th 2006, 5:17pm

Quoted

- a 105mm which will be too light as main gun for destroyer+ sized ships and too weak as heavy AA gun on capital ships in the long run


The 105mm too light as an AA gun? Not at least through the end of the battleship period. Too light as a DP gun on capital ships, yes, but too light as an AA weapon? Not likely.

9

Friday, April 7th 2006, 5:39pm

Quoted

The 105mm too light as an AA gun? Not at least through the end of the battleship period. Too light as a DP gun on capital ships, yes, but too light as an AA weapon? Not likely.


It depends really. There are a few tricks that could be used. I won't elaborate at the current time.

10

Friday, April 7th 2006, 8:55pm

Quoted

Originally posted by Hrolf Hakonson
Heh, convergent evolution going the other way, then. ;)


Call it convergent de-evolution? :-)

11

Saturday, April 8th 2006, 12:14pm

70 planes on 14,000tons?

After 5-6 years of air ops a competent navy will be asking for more fuel NOT more planes.

I'd expect at least the carrier and the destroyer to share calibre of gun mounts. What about ditching the leaders (and their unique guns) and transfering the tonnage from cruisers to destroyers?

The DDs have no heavy AA at all?

Cheers,

12

Saturday, April 8th 2006, 8:06pm

What planes are the RSAN using for carriers? Because there are smaller planes in the 1920s and 1930s that might fit, at least folded up rather than later planes from the late 1930s and 1940 would would render the carrier's ability to maybe 30-50 planes....or less if they can't use the evelator or fit in the hanger.

13

Saturday, April 8th 2006, 8:43pm

Quoted

The Japanese asked for a licence to build their own...and the RSAN could always make good use of some "money".

Just make sure that the sailors do not waste that 'money' on all the drinks. :-)

Quoted

The 10mm deck is there to provide more strength should the ship blow through some heavier seas at high speed.

Hey that's good to know. Just before posting the Japanese version, I was thinking about ditching the deck armor. A few seconds later I had already pressed the "Post Reply" button.

Quoted

What about ditching the leaders (and their unique guns) and transfering the tonnage from cruisers to destroyers?

Because Hooman likes that design a lot. :-)

HoOmAn

Keeper of the Sacred Block Coefficient

  • Send private message

14

Sunday, April 9th 2006, 12:01pm

Quoted

Originally posted by alt_naval
70 planes on 14,000tons?

After 5-6 years of air ops a competent navy will be asking for more fuel NOT more planes.

I'd expect at least the carrier and the destroyer to share calibre of gun mounts. What about ditching the leaders (and their unique guns) and transfering the tonnage from cruisers to destroyers?

The DDs have no heavy AA at all?

Cheers,


The DDs have no heavy AA as the RSAN think they are too small and maneouverable a target to be in much danger from planes. Probably the RSAN will later learn that the DDs will either need a heavy AA caliber gun or DP main guns.

I´m not too keen to skip my leaders. As Walter said I really like the design. Further more the RSAN has enough cruiser tonnage to build those DL and still transfer Cl tonnage to DD tonnage. But I´ve yet to build to DD tonnage limits anyway.

The DD30-class is a rebuild of the DD27-class. Thus I haven´t changed their main gun caliber. However, the next class of DDs will most likely feature the new 115mm gun like the DL28-class.

The 135mm guns will not remain unique.

Regarding fuel - what exactly do you mean?

HoOmAn

Keeper of the Sacred Block Coefficient

  • Send private message

15

Sunday, April 9th 2006, 12:04pm

Quoted

Originally posted by Ithekro
What planes are the RSAN using for carriers? Because there are smaller planes in the 1920s and 1930s that might fit, at least folded up rather than later planes from the late 1930s and 1940 would would render the carrier's ability to maybe 30-50 planes....or less if they can't use the evelator or fit in the hanger.


What planes? Uh... They have wings, I guess. And some kind of power plant. 4-stroke 6 cyl. engines or so....

You´re right. The planes currently in use are relatively small. So perhaps there are reall up to 70 of them on the carrier (fighters/torpedo bombers/scouts - no dive bombers yet, this kind of technology has yet to be developed). But should we reach a WW2 level of technology I can´t see more than 45-50 planes in use like on the american CVLs....

HoOmAn

Keeper of the Sacred Block Coefficient

  • Send private message

16

Sunday, April 9th 2006, 12:06pm

Quoted

Originally posted by Rooijen10

Quoted

The Japanese asked for a licence to build their own...and the RSAN could always make good use of some "money".

Just make sure that the sailors do not waste that 'money' on all the drinks. :-)


Dang! I knew there was something up their sleeves when they just left the ship for a "shopping tour".....!

17

Sunday, April 9th 2006, 1:06pm

Quoted

Regarding fuel - what exactly do you mean?


Only enough fuel and munitions for 1-2 sorties per plane with small carriers.

Quoted

The DDs have no heavy AA at all?


40° elevation on the mountings is enough for long-range AA.

Quoted

And some kind of power plant. 4-stroke 6 cyl. engines or so....


Italy was going to go for 2-stroke diesels with turbosuperchargers just to be a bit different. Efficiency improves considerably but size begins to be a problem.

18

Sunday, April 9th 2006, 1:31pm

Quoted

Originally posted by Red Admiral

Quoted

And some kind of power plant. 4-stroke 6 cyl. engines or so....


Italy was going to go for 2-stroke diesels with turbosuperchargers just to be a bit different. Efficiency improves considerably but size begins to be a problem.


Your joking right?

19

Sunday, April 9th 2006, 1:40pm

What about elastic bands?

From 1920-1940 every new design of carrier increased the proportion of fuel to planes on carriers.

20

Sunday, April 9th 2006, 1:52pm

Quoted

Your joking right?


Sounds like the Junkers Jumo 205 aircraft diesel and descendents to me. Fairly common engines on various large German aircraft of the 30s, I'm expecting to use them on patrol seaplanes, transports, and possibly on some heavy bombers (the Jumo 223). They're not great on planes where you have to vary the throttle speed, but for planes that do lots of cruising, they're great.