You are not logged in.

1

Wednesday, February 22nd 2006, 10:02pm

Warship Study - 1933 Small Battleship

I know this ship can be considered a waste of money and resources, because obviously she cannot compete against most of the vessels already in service, either in Wesworld or in the real one.

She´s small, not too fast, but a hard nut to crack. Think of her as the best a secondary or minor power can get built. In fact Spain in the late 20s was considering to build 4 small BBs (23000t) similarly armed with 8-9 12in guns.

Well, since I´m not anymore an active player, you can consider this project as a private initiative, not backed by any goverment. Opinions?

20000t Battleship


20000t Battleship, project SBB33b, laid down 1933

Displacement:
18.947 t light; 20.000 t standard; 21.477 t normal; 22.658 t full load

Dimensions: Length overall / water x beam x draught
610,00 ft / 600,00 ft x 80,00 ft x 27,00 ft (normal load)
185,93 m / 182,88 m x 24,38 m x 8,23 m

Armament:
8 - 12,01" / 305 mm guns (2x4 guns), 865,70lbs / 392,67kg shells, 1933 Model
Breech loading guns in turrets (on barbettes)
on centreline ends, evenly spread
4 - 4,72" / 120 mm guns (2x2 guns), 52,72lbs / 23,91kg shells, 1933 Model
Anti-aircraft guns in deck mounts
on centreline ends, evenly spread, all raised mounts
12 - 4,72" / 120 mm guns (6x2 guns), 52,72lbs / 23,91kg shells, 1933 Model
Anti-aircraft guns in deck mounts
on side, all amidships
16 - 1,57" / 40,0 mm guns (4x4 guns), 1,95lbs / 0,88kg shells, 1933 Model
Anti-aircraft guns in deck mounts
on side, evenly spread
24 - 0,79" / 20,0 mm guns (12x2 guns), 0,24lbs / 0,11kg shells, 1933 Model
Anti-aircraft guns in deck mounts
on side, evenly spread
Weight of broadside 7.806 lbs / 3.541 kg
Shells per gun, main battery: 140

Armour:
- Belts: Width (max) Length (avg) Height (avg)
Main: 14,0" / 356 mm 360,00 ft / 109,73 m 12,00 ft / 3,66 m
Ends: Unarmoured
Main Belt covers 92 % of normal length

- Torpedo Bulkhead:
1,00" / 25 mm 520,00 ft / 158,50 m 20,00 ft / 6,10 m

- Gun armour: Face (max) Other gunhouse (avg) Barbette/hoist (max)
Main: 14,0" / 356 mm 6,00" / 152 mm 11,0" / 279 mm
2nd: 2,00" / 51 mm - -
3rd: 1,00" / 25 mm - -
4th: 1,00" / 25 mm - -

- Armour deck: 5,50" / 140 mm, Conning tower: 5,00" / 127 mm

Machinery:
Oil fired boilers, steam turbines,
Geared drive, 4 shafts, 73.145 shp / 54.566 Kw = 27,00 kts
Range 7.330nm at 15,00 kts
Bunker at max displacement = 2.658 tons

Complement:
886 - 1.153

Cost:
£8,420 million / $33,681 million

Distribution of weights at normal displacement:
Armament: 976 tons, 4,5 %
Armour: 7.875 tons, 36,7 %
- Belts: 2.641 tons, 12,3 %
- Torpedo bulkhead: 385 tons, 1,8 %
- Armament: 1.260 tons, 5,9 %
- Armour Deck: 3.506 tons, 16,3 %
- Conning Tower: 83 tons, 0,4 %
Machinery: 2.131 tons, 9,9 %
Hull, fittings & equipment: 7.865 tons, 36,6 %
Fuel, ammunition & stores: 2.530 tons, 11,8 %
Miscellaneous weights: 100 tons, 0,5 %

Overall survivability and seakeeping ability:
Survivability (Non-critical penetrating hits needed to sink ship):
32.664 lbs / 14.816 Kg = 37,7 x 12,0 " / 305 mm shells or 4,9 torpedoes
Stability (Unstable if below 1.00): 1,08
Metacentric height 4,2 ft / 1,3 m
Roll period: 16,5 seconds
Steadiness - As gun platform (Average = 50 %): 70 %
- Recoil effect (Restricted arc if above 1.00): 0,79
Seaboat quality (Average = 1.00): 1,21

Hull form characteristics:
Hull has low quarterdeck
Block coefficient: 0,580
Length to Beam Ratio: 7,50 : 1
'Natural speed' for length: 24,49 kts
Power going to wave formation at top speed: 54 %
Trim (Max stability = 0, Max steadiness = 100): 58
Bow angle (Positive = bow angles forward): 21,04 degrees
Stern overhang: 0,00 ft / 0,00 m
Freeboard (% = measuring location as a percentage of overall length):
- Stem: 26,00 ft / 7,92 m
- Forecastle (20 %): 22,00 ft / 6,71 m
- Mid (50 %): 22,00 ft / 6,71 m
- Quarterdeck (18 %): 14,00 ft / 4,27 m (22,00 ft / 6,71 m before break)
- Stern: 14,00 ft / 4,27 m
- Average freeboard: 20,88 ft / 6,36 m
Ship tends to be wet forward

Ship space, strength and comments:
Space - Hull below water (magazines/engines, low = better): 91,1 %
- Above water (accommodation/working, high = better): 163,0 %
Waterplane Area: 34.455 Square feet or 3.201 Square metres
Displacement factor (Displacement / loading): 107 %
Structure weight / hull surface area: 153 lbs/sq ft or 749 Kg/sq metre
Hull strength (Relative):
- Cross-sectional: 0,94
- Longitudinal: 1,68
- Overall: 1,00
Hull space for machinery, storage, compartmentation is adequate
Room for accommodation and workspaces is excellent
Ship has slow, easy roll, a good, steady gun platform
Good seaboat, rides out heavy weather easily

2

Wednesday, February 22nd 2006, 10:21pm

Interesting, but you've pointed out most of the shortcomings already

Given my inability to run springsharp, feel free to represent yourself as Canadian Vickers or whatnot.

Why not a midships crossdeck catapult? It looks like the hangar is there already.

3

Wednesday, February 22nd 2006, 10:27pm

I did not use the midships catapult mainly for two reasons:

- I needed some place to put the boats
- And I wanted to space the secondaries, putting the catapult there would mean I´d have to move those two mounts and get them too close for my taste to any of the other mounts.

4

Wednesday, February 22nd 2006, 10:28pm

Pretty ship, as always

and I've seen worse uses of 20,000 tons.

I think the aftmost 20mm mounts are going to have a hard time from blast.

5

Wednesday, February 22nd 2006, 10:36pm

Thanks for your words, and yes I know those mounts are problematic, but at that moment I couldn´t find a better place, I was busy with the main superstructure...

BTW, for the people that likes a bit more firepower, those 8 12in guns can be replaced by 6 13,4in guns without any major change to the design. The only difference is that I had to get rid of the armoured conning tower.

20000t Battleship, project SBB33c, laid down 1933

Displacement:
19.110 t light; 20.000 t standard; 21.477 t normal; 22.658 t full load

Dimensions: Length overall / water x beam x draught
610,00 ft / 600,00 ft x 80,00 ft x 27,00 ft (normal load)
185,93 m / 182,88 m x 24,38 m x 8,23 m

Armament:
6 - 13,39" / 340 mm guns (2x3 guns), 1.199,24lbs / 543,97kg shells, 1933 Model
Breech loading guns in turrets (on barbettes)
on centreline ends, evenly spread
4 - 4,72" / 120 mm guns (2x2 guns), 52,72lbs / 23,91kg shells, 1933 Model
Anti-aircraft guns in deck mounts
on centreline ends, evenly spread, all raised mounts
12 - 4,72" / 120 mm guns (6x2 guns), 52,72lbs / 23,91kg shells, 1933 Model
Anti-aircraft guns in deck mounts
on side, all amidships
16 - 1,57" / 40,0 mm guns (4x4 guns), 1,95lbs / 0,88kg shells, 1933 Model
Anti-aircraft guns in deck mounts
on side, evenly spread
24 - 0,79" / 20,0 mm guns (12x2 guns), 0,24lbs / 0,11kg shells, 1933 Model
Anti-aircraft guns in deck mounts
on side, evenly spread
Weight of broadside 8.076 lbs / 3.663 kg
Shells per gun, main battery: 100

Armour:
- Belts: Width (max) Length (avg) Height (avg)
Main: 14,0" / 356 mm 360,00 ft / 109,73 m 12,00 ft / 3,66 m
Ends: Unarmoured
Main Belt covers 92 % of normal length

- Torpedo Bulkhead:
1,00" / 25 mm 520,00 ft / 158,50 m 20,00 ft / 6,10 m

- Gun armour: Face (max) Other gunhouse (avg) Barbette/hoist (max)
Main: 14,0" / 356 mm 6,00" / 152 mm 11,0" / 279 mm
2nd: 2,00" / 51 mm - -
3rd: 1,00" / 25 mm - -
4th: 1,00" / 25 mm - -

- Armour deck: 5,50" / 140 mm

Machinery:
Oil fired boilers, steam turbines,
Geared drive, 4 shafts, 73.145 shp / 54.566 Kw = 27,00 kts
Range 7.330nm at 15,00 kts
Bunker at max displacement = 2.658 tons

Complement:
886 - 1.153

Cost:
£8,581 million / $34,324 million

Distribution of weights at normal displacement:
Armament: 1.010 tons, 4,7 %
Armour: 7.876 tons, 36,7 %
- Belts: 2.641 tons, 12,3 %
- Torpedo bulkhead: 385 tons, 1,8 %
- Armament: 1.345 tons, 6,3 %
- Armour Deck: 3.506 tons, 16,3 %
- Conning Tower: 0 tons, 0,0 %
Machinery: 2.131 tons, 9,9 %
Hull, fittings & equipment: 7.993 tons, 37,2 %
Fuel, ammunition & stores: 2.367 tons, 11,0 %
Miscellaneous weights: 100 tons, 0,5 %

Overall survivability and seakeeping ability:
Survivability (Non-critical penetrating hits needed to sink ship):
32.616 lbs / 14.794 Kg = 27,2 x 13,4 " / 340 mm shells or 4,9 torpedoes
Stability (Unstable if below 1.00): 1,08
Metacentric height 4,1 ft / 1,3 m
Roll period: 16,6 seconds
Steadiness - As gun platform (Average = 50 %): 70 %
- Recoil effect (Restricted arc if above 1.00): 0,82
Seaboat quality (Average = 1.00): 1,20

Hull form characteristics:
Hull has low quarterdeck
Block coefficient: 0,580
Length to Beam Ratio: 7,50 : 1
'Natural speed' for length: 24,49 kts
Power going to wave formation at top speed: 54 %
Trim (Max stability = 0, Max steadiness = 100): 58
Bow angle (Positive = bow angles forward): 21,04 degrees
Stern overhang: 0,00 ft / 0,00 m
Freeboard (% = measuring location as a percentage of overall length):
- Stem: 26,00 ft / 7,92 m
- Forecastle (20 %): 22,00 ft / 6,71 m
- Mid (50 %): 22,00 ft / 6,71 m
- Quarterdeck (18 %): 14,00 ft / 4,27 m (22,00 ft / 6,71 m before break)
- Stern: 14,00 ft / 4,27 m
- Average freeboard: 20,88 ft / 6,36 m
Ship tends to be wet forward

Ship space, strength and comments:
Space - Hull below water (magazines/engines, low = better): 91,4 %
- Above water (accommodation/working, high = better): 163,0 %
Waterplane Area: 34.455 Square feet or 3.201 Square metres
Displacement factor (Displacement / loading): 106 %
Structure weight / hull surface area: 156 lbs/sq ft or 761 Kg/sq metre
Hull strength (Relative):
- Cross-sectional: 0,94
- Longitudinal: 1,69
- Overall: 1,00
Hull space for machinery, storage, compartmentation is adequate
Room for accommodation and workspaces is excellent
Ship has slow, easy roll, a good, steady gun platform
Good seaboat, rides out heavy weather easily

6

Wednesday, February 22nd 2006, 10:44pm

Trying to post legible historical projects...



Historical RN designs from 1927-1929.

Note that the closest design has only 8x10" on 21000tons and 25knts speed.

Lovely picture but need HACS.

7

Wednesday, February 22nd 2006, 11:00pm

I knew I was forgetting something... I´ll edit the picture for tomorrow.

HoOmAn

Keeper of the Sacred Block Coefficient

  • Send private message

8

Thursday, February 23rd 2006, 9:16am

I envy your drawing skills, Gravina.... :o)

Is the hangar lift (or retractable roof?) large enough for a floatplane?

9

Thursday, February 23rd 2006, 9:25am

You all may remeber my attenpts at small BB.
After much thinking I ended up with a full size ship of the line.
So un intentionaly I repeted historical attempts at small BB.
Starting small and ending with a full size version.

10

Thursday, February 23rd 2006, 9:55am

Quoted

Originally posted by HoOmAn
I envy your drawing skills, Gravina.... :o)

Is the hangar lift (or retractable roof?) large enough for a floatplane?


Looks big enough, especially if it's got folding wings.