You are not logged in.

Dear visitor, welcome to WesWorld. If this is your first visit here, please read the Help. It explains in detail how this page works. To use all features of this page, you should consider registering. Please use the registration form, to register here or read more information about the registration process. If you are already registered, please login here.

1

Thursday, May 15th 2003, 12:00am

Saved thread - Fuso development

Rooijen10
Spammer wanna be
Posts: 7
(4/9/03 12:28:43 pm)
Fuso development
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I'll kick this section off with the Fuso

This is how the design of the fuso developed since I joined the sim.


This is the first design of the Fuso I had without a stability warning. The few designs I had before this one had a stability under 1.00. This design is also reasonably historical.
I moved the file to another directory, but the date is january 22.


Fuso, laid down 1912

Length, 640 ft x Beam, 94.0 ft x Depth, 28.3 ft
30889 tons normal displacement (29581 tons standard)

Main battery: 12 x 14.0-inch (6 x 2; 3 superfiring)
Secondary battery: 16 x 6.0-inch
QF battery: 4 x 5.5-inch
Light battery: 8 x 0.5-inch

Weight of broadside: 18525 lbs

6 TT, 21.0" (submerged)

Main belt, 12.0 inches; bow and stern, 3.5 inches
Upper belt, 8.0 inches
Torpedo bulkhead, 2.0 inches
Armor deck, average 2.0 inches
C.T., 10.0 inches

Battery armor:
Main, 10.0" / secondary, 4.0"
QF, 1.0" / light guns, 1.0" shields

Maximum speed for 39975 shp = 21.74 knots
Approximate cruising radius, 8000 nm / 10 kts

Typical complement: 1165-1514


Remarks:

Oil firing.

Ship is roomy, with superior accommodation and working space.

Main deck secondary guns subject to being washed down
in a seaway.


Distribution of weights:
Percent
normal
displacement:

Armament ......................... 2316 tons = 7 pct
Armor, total ..................... 10393 tons = 34 pct

Belt 3967 tons = 13 pct
Torpedo bulkhead 871 tons = 3 pct
Deck 1642 tons = 5 pct
C.T. 213 tons = 1 pct
Armament 3700 tons = 12 pct

Machinery ........................ 1594 tons = 5 pct
Hull and fittings; equipment ..... 13087 tons = 42 pct
Fuel, ammunition, stores ......... 3469 tons = 11 pct
Miscellaneous weights ............ 30 tons = 0 pct
-----
30889 tons = 100 pct

Estimated metacentric height, 5.0 ft

Displacement summary:

Light ship: 27420 tons
Standard displacement: 29581 tons
Normal service: 30889 tons
Full load: 31811 tons

Loading submergence 1268 tons/foot

+++++++++++++++++++++++++


Estimated overall survivability and seakeeping ability:

Relative margin of stability: 1.04

Shellfire needed to sink: 27503 lbs = 20.0 x 14.0-inch shells
(Approximates weight of penetrating
shell hits needed to sink ship,
not counting critical hits)

Torpedoes needed to sink: 3.7
(Approximates number of 'typical'
torpedo hits needed to sink ship)

Relative steadiness as gun platform, 53 percent
(50 percent is 'average')

Relative rocking effect from firing to beam, 0.79

Relative quality as a seaboat: 1.18

+++++++++++++++++++++++++


Hull form characteristics:

Block coefficient: 0.63
Sharpness coefficient: 0.42
Hull speed coefficient 'M' = 6.24
'Natural speed' for length = 25.3 knots
Power going to wave formation
at top speed: 43 percent


Estimated hull characteristics and strength:

Relative underwater volume absorbed by
magazines and engineering spaces: 100 percent

Relative accommodation and working space: 131 percent


Displacement factor: 97 percent
(Displacement relative to loading factors)


Relative cross-sectional hull strength: 1.07
(Structure weight per square
foot of hull surface: 215 lbs)

Relative longitudinal hull strength: 1.24
(for 18.0 ft average freeboard;
freeboard adjustment -1.0 ft)

Relative composite hull strength: 1.09

+++++++++++++++++++++++++


[Machine-readable parameters: Spring Style v. 1.2.1]

640.00 x 94.00 x 28.30; 18.00 -- Dimensions
0.63 -- Block coefficient
1912 -- Year laid down
21.74 / 8000 / 10.00; Oil-fired turbine or equivalent -- Speed / radius / cruise
30 tons -- Miscellaneous weights
++++++++++
12 x 14.00; 6; 3 -- Main battery; turrets; superfiring
:
16 x 6.00; 0 -- Secondary battery; turrets
Main deck battery
:
4 x 5.50 -- Tertiary (QF/AA) battery
:
8 x 0.50 -- Fourth (light) battery
6 / 6 / 21.00 -- TT / submerged / size
++++++++++
12.00 / 3.50 / 8.00 / 2.00; 100 -- Belt armor; relative extent
2.00 / 10.00 -- Deck / CT
10.00 / 4.00 / 1.00 / 1.00 -- Battery armor


+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++




Walter



Edited by: Rooijen10 at: 4/9/03 12:30:57 pm

Rooijen10
Spammer wanna be
Posts: 8
(4/9/03 12:37:22 pm)
Re: Fuso development
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
There were quite a few things that I could improve with the design. The stability was a mere 1.04 and I had a hull strength of 1.09. Speed was a mere 21.7 knots and it had a 8,000 NM range at 10 knots. So I made a few adjustments. One major adjustment was size, the other was the AA guns. I'll blame the last one on Oonishi and his father .

The date of this design is january 28.

Fuso design II

Fuso, laid down 1912

Length, 700 ft x Beam, 100.0 ft x Depth, 28.0 ft
32480 tons normal displacement (31121 tons standard)

Main battery: 12 x 14.0-inch (6 x 2; 2 superfiring)
Secondary battery: 16 x 5.0-inch
QF battery: 40 x 1.0-inch
Light battery: 80 x 0.5-inch

Weight of broadside: 17489 lbs

6 TT, 21.0" (submerged)

Main belt, 12.0 inches; bow and stern, 3.5 inches
Upper belt, 8.0 inches
Torpedo bulkhead, 2.0 inches
Armor deck, average 2.0 inches
C.T., 10.0 inches

Battery armor:
Main, 10.0" / secondary, 4.0"
QF, 1.0" shields / light guns, 1.0" shields

Maximum speed for 60025 shp = 24.26 knots
Approximate cruising radius, 8000 nm / 10 kts

Typical complement: 1210-1573


Estimated cost, $12.748 million (£3.187 million)

Remarks:

Oil firing.

Ship is roomy, with superior accommodation and working space.

Main deck secondary guns subject to being washed down
in a seaway.


Distribution of weights:
Percent
normal
displacement:

Armament ......................... 2186 tons = 7 pct
Armor, total ..................... 10998 tons = 34 pct

Belt 4421 tons = 14 pct
Torpedo bulkhead 943 tons = 3 pct
Deck 1798 tons = 6 pct
C.T. 220 tons = 1 pct
Armament 3616 tons = 11 pct

Machinery ........................ 2393 tons = 7 pct
Hull and fittings; equipment ..... 13437 tons = 41 pct
Fuel, ammunition, stores ......... 3466 tons = 11 pct
Miscellaneous weights ............ 0 tons = 0 pct
-----
32480 tons = 100 pct

Estimated metacentric height, 5.9 ft

Displacement summary:

Light ship: 29014 tons
Standard displacement: 31121 tons
Normal service: 32480 tons
Full load: 33437 tons

Loading submergence 1388 tons/foot

+++++++++++++++++++++++++


Estimated overall survivability and seakeeping ability:

Relative margin of stability: 1.09

Shellfire needed to sink: 30972 lbs = 22.6 x 14.0-inch shells
(Approximates weight of penetrating
shell hits needed to sink ship,
not counting critical hits)

Torpedoes needed to sink: 4.3
(Approximates number of 'typical'
torpedo hits needed to sink ship)

Relative steadiness as gun platform, 59 percent
(50 percent is 'average')

Relative rocking effect from firing to beam, 0.64

Relative quality as a seaboat: 1.18

+++++++++++++++++++++++++


Hull form characteristics:

Block coefficient: 0.58
Sharpness coefficient: 0.40
Hull speed coefficient 'M' = 6.71
'Natural speed' for length = 26.5 knots
Power going to wave formation
at top speed: 44 percent


Estimated hull characteristics and strength:

Relative underwater volume absorbed by
magazines and engineering spaces: 99 percent

Relative accommodation and working space: 145 percent


Displacement factor: 98 percent
(Displacement relative to loading factors)


Relative cross-sectional hull strength: 1.02
(Structure weight per square
foot of hull surface: 202 lbs)

Relative longitudinal hull strength: 1.10
(for 19.0 ft average freeboard;
freeboard adjustment -0.2 ft)

Relative composite hull strength: 1.03

+++++++++++++++++++++++++


[Machine-readable parameters: Spring Style v. 1.2.1]

700.00 x 100.00 x 28.00; 19.00 -- Dimensions
0.58 -- Block coefficient
1912 -- Year laid down
24.26 / 8000 / 10.00; Oil-fired turbine or equivalent -- Speed / radius / cruise
0 tons -- Miscellaneous weights
++++++++++
12 x 14.00; 6; 2 -- Main battery; turrets; superfiring
:
16 x 5.00; 0 -- Secondary battery; turrets
Main deck battery
:
40 x 1.00 -- Tertiary (QF/AA) battery
Gun-shields
:
80 x 0.50 -- Fourth (light) battery
6 / 6 / 21.00 -- TT / submerged / size
++++++++++
12.00 / 3.50 / 8.00 / 2.00; 100 -- Belt armor; relative extent
2.00 / 10.00 -- Deck / CT
10.00 / 4.00 / 1.00 / 1.00 -- Battery armor


+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++


Edited by: Rooijen10 at: 4/9/03 12:39:12 pm

Rooijen10
Spammer wanna be
Posts: 9
(4/9/03 12:45:54 pm)
Re: Fuso development
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
February 15 saw the next change. I wasn't satisfied with the ship yet. I made the ship 10 feet longer, increased range and speed a bit. I made armor an inch thinner on the ends and the upper belt.

Fuso Design III

Fuso, laid down 1912

Length, 710 ft x Beam, 100.0 ft x Depth, 28.0 ft
34080 tons normal displacement (30976 tons standard)

Main battery: 12 x 14.0-inch (6 x 2; 2 superfiring)
Secondary battery: 16 x 5.0-inch
QF battery: 40 x 1.0-inch
Light battery: 80 x 0.5-inch

Weight of broadside: 17489 lbs

6 TT, 21.0" (submerged)

Main belt, 12.0 inches; bow and stern, 2.0 inches
Upper belt, 7.0 inches
Torpedo bulkhead, 2.0 inches
Armor deck, average 2.0 inches
C.T., 10.0 inches

Battery armor:
Main, 10.0" / secondary, 4.0"
QF, 1.0" shields / light guns, 1.0" shields

Maximum speed for 66290 shp = 24.70 knots
Approximate cruising radius, 12000 nm / 12 kts

Typical complement: 1254-1630


Estimated cost, $12.863 million (£3.216 million)

Remarks:

Oil firing.

Ship is roomy, with superior accommodation and working space.

Main deck secondary guns subject to being washed down
in a seaway.


Distribution of weights:
Percent
normal
displacement:

Armament ......................... 2186 tons = 6 pct
Armor, total ..................... 10711 tons = 31 pct

Belt 4154 tons = 12 pct
Torpedo bulkhead 956 tons = 3 pct
Deck 1866 tons = 5 pct
C.T. 227 tons = 1 pct
Armament 3508 tons = 10 pct

Machinery ........................ 2643 tons = 8 pct
Hull and fittings; equipment ..... 13296 tons = 39 pct
Fuel, ammunition, stores ......... 5243 tons = 15 pct
Miscellaneous weights ............ 0 tons = 0 pct
-----
34080 tons = 100 pct

Estimated metacentric height, 6.3 ft

Displacement summary:

Light ship: 28837 tons
Standard displacement: 30976 tons
Normal service: 34080 tons
Full load: 36427 tons

Loading submergence 1441 tons/foot

+++++++++++++++++++++++++


Estimated overall survivability and seakeeping ability:

Relative margin of stability: 1.13

Shellfire needed to sink: 32786 lbs = 23.9 x 14.0-inch shells
(Approximates weight of penetrating
shell hits needed to sink ship,
not counting critical hits)

Torpedoes needed to sink: 4.5
(Approximates number of 'typical'
torpedo hits needed to sink ship)

Relative steadiness as gun platform, 57 percent
(50 percent is 'average')

Relative rocking effect from firing to beam, 0.56

Relative quality as a seaboat: 1.13

+++++++++++++++++++++++++


Hull form characteristics:

Block coefficient: 0.60
Sharpness coefficient: 0.41
Hull speed coefficient 'M' = 6.70
'Natural speed' for length = 26.6 knots
Power going to wave formation
at top speed: 45 percent


Estimated hull characteristics and strength:

Relative underwater volume absorbed by
magazines and engineering spaces: 97 percent

Relative accommodation and working space: 138 percent


Displacement factor: 102 percent
(Displacement relative to loading factors)


Relative cross-sectional hull strength: 1.02
(Structure weight per square
foot of hull surface: 195 lbs)

Relative longitudinal hull strength: 1.00
(for 18.0 ft average freeboard;
freeboard adjustment -1.4 ft)

Relative composite hull strength: 1.00

+++++++++++++++++++++++++


[Machine-readable parameters: Spring Style v. 1.2.1]

710.00 x 100.00 x 28.00; 18.00 -- Dimensions
0.60 -- Block coefficient
1912 -- Year laid down
24.70 / 12000 / 12.00; Oil-fired turbine or equivalent -- Speed / radius / cruise
0 tons -- Miscellaneous weights
++++++++++
12 x 14.00; 6; 2 -- Main battery; turrets; superfiring
:
16 x 5.00; 0 -- Secondary battery; turrets
Main deck battery
:
40 x 1.00 -- Tertiary (QF/AA) battery
Gun-shields
:
80 x 0.50 -- Fourth (light) battery
6 / 6 / 21.00 -- TT / submerged / size
++++++++++
12.00 / 2.00 / 7.00 / 2.00; 100 -- Belt armor; relative extent
2.00 / 10.00 -- Deck / CT
10.00 / 4.00 / 1.00 / 1.00 -- Battery armor


+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++


Rooijen10
Spammer wanna be
Posts: 11
(4/9/03 1:03:47 pm)
Re: Fuso development
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
February 20 was the next change. Beam was increased a bit. Speed now was at 25 knots, making her the fastest of the designs. The range increased by 1200 NM to 13,200. Armor on the ends and the upper belt was increased by an inch.

[edit: oops... wrong design]

Fuso Design IV

Fuso, laid down 1912

Length, 710 ft x Beam, 104.0 ft x Depth, 28.0 ft
35443 tons normal displacement (31968 tons standard)

Main battery: 12 x 14.0-inch (6 x 2; 2 superfiring)
Secondary battery: 16 x 5.0-inch
QF battery: 40 x 1.0-inch
Light battery: 80 x 0.5-inch

Weight of broadside: 17489 lbs

6 TT, 21.0" (submerged)

Main belt, 12.0 inches; bow and stern, 3.0 inches
Upper belt, 8.0 inches
Torpedo bulkhead, 2.0 inches
Armor deck, average 2.0 inches
C.T., 11.0 inches

Battery armor:
Main, 10.0" / secondary, 4.0"
QF, 1.0" shields / light guns, 1.0" shields

Maximum speed for 71528 shp = 25.00 knots
Approximate cruising radius, 13200 nm / 12 kts

Typical complement: 1292-1679


Estimated cost, $13.115 million (£3.279 million)

Remarks:

Oil firing.

Ship is roomy, with superior accommodation and working space.

Main deck secondary guns subject to being washed down
in a seaway.


Distribution of weights:
Percent
normal
displacement:

Armament ......................... 2186 tons = 6 pct
Armor, total ..................... 11208 tons = 32 pct

Belt 4506 tons = 13 pct
Torpedo bulkhead 956 tons = 3 pct
Deck 1940 tons = 5 pct
C.T. 257 tons = 1 pct
Armament 3549 tons = 10 pct

Machinery ........................ 2852 tons = 8 pct
Hull and fittings; equipment ..... 13556 tons = 38 pct
Fuel, ammunition, stores ......... 5641 tons = 16 pct
Miscellaneous weights ............ 0 tons = 0 pct
-----
35443 tons = 100 pct

Estimated metacentric height, 7.0 ft

Displacement summary:

Light ship: 29802 tons
Standard displacement: 31968 tons
Normal service: 35443 tons
Full load: 38082 tons

Loading submergence 1498 tons/foot

+++++++++++++++++++++++++


Estimated overall survivability and seakeeping ability:

Relative margin of stability: 1.16

Shellfire needed to sink: 35634 lbs = 26.0 x 14.0-inch shells
(Approximates weight of penetrating
shell hits needed to sink ship,
not counting critical hits)

Torpedoes needed to sink: 4.9
(Approximates number of 'typical'
torpedo hits needed to sink ship)

Relative steadiness as gun platform, 55 percent
(50 percent is 'average')

Relative rocking effect from firing to beam, 0.49

Relative quality as a seaboat: 1.10

+++++++++++++++++++++++++


Hull form characteristics:

Block coefficient: 0.60
Sharpness coefficient: 0.41
Hull speed coefficient 'M' = 6.61
'Natural speed' for length = 26.6 knots
Power going to wave formation
at top speed: 46 percent


Estimated hull characteristics and strength:

Relative underwater volume absorbed by
magazines and engineering spaces: 95 percent

Relative accommodation and working space: 142 percent


Displacement factor: 104 percent
(Displacement relative to loading factors)


Relative cross-sectional hull strength: 1.00
(Structure weight per square
foot of hull surface: 194 lbs)

Relative longitudinal hull strength: 1.00
(for 18.4 ft average freeboard;
freeboard adjustment -1.1 ft)

Relative composite hull strength: 1.00

+++++++++++++++++++++++++


[Machine-readable parameters: Spring Style v. 1.2.1]

710.00 x 104.00 x 28.00; 18.40 -- Dimensions
0.60 -- Block coefficient
1912 -- Year laid down
25.00 / 13200 / 12.00; Oil-fired turbine or equivalent -- Speed / radius / cruise
0 tons -- Miscellaneous weights
++++++++++
12 x 14.00; 6; 2 -- Main battery; turrets; superfiring
:
16 x 5.00; 0 -- Secondary battery; turrets
Main deck battery
:
40 x 1.00 -- Tertiary (QF/AA) battery
Gun-shields
:
80 x 0.50 -- Fourth (light) battery
6 / 6 / 21.00 -- TT / submerged / size
++++++++++
12.00 / 3.00 / 8.00 / 2.00; 100 -- Belt armor; relative extent
2.00 / 11.00 -- Deck / CT
10.00 / 4.00 / 1.00 / 1.00 -- Battery armor


+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Edited by: Rooijen10 at: 4/9/03 1:16:49 pm

Rooijen10
Spammer wanna be
Posts: 12
(4/9/03 1:18:59 pm)
Re: Fuso development
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[Correct order now]
March 1 saw a test for a different Fuso. Laid down in 1914 rather than 1912, I changed the 6x2 main gun layout to a 3-2-2-2-3 layout. It was just a test. Speed was decreased by half a knot and range increased to 17,000 NM at 12 knots. This was the first Fuso design where I changed the extent of belt armor.

Fuso Design V

Fuso, laid down 1914

Length, 710 ft x Beam, 104.0 ft x Depth, 28.0 ft
35443 tons normal displacement (31349 tons standard)

Main battery: 12 x 14.0-inch (5 turrets; 2 superfiring)
Secondary battery: 16 x 5.0-inch
AA battery: 40 x 1.0-inch
Light battery: 80 x 0.5-inch

Weight of broadside: 17489 lbs

6 TT, 21.0" (submerged)

Main belt, 12.0 inches; bow and stern, 3.0 inches
Upper belt, 8.0 inches
Torpedo bulkhead, 2.0 inches
Armor deck, average 2.0 inches
C.T., 11.0 inches

Battery armor:
Main, 10.0" / secondary, 4.0"
AA, 1.0" shields / light guns, 1.0" shields

Maximum speed for 66209 shp = 24.50 knots
Approximate cruising radius, 17000 nm / 12 kts

Typical complement: 1292-1679


Estimated cost, $16.366 million (£4.092 million)

Remarks:

Oil firing.

Relative extent of belt armor, 94 percent of 'typical' coverage.

Ship is roomy, with superior accommodation and working space.

Main deck secondary guns subject to being washed down
in a seaway.


Distribution of weights:
Percent
normal
displacement:

Armament ......................... 2186 tons = 6 pct
Armor, total ..................... 10729 tons = 30 pct

Belt 4236 tons = 12 pct
Torpedo bulkhead 956 tons = 3 pct
Deck 1940 tons = 5 pct
C.T. 257 tons = 1 pct
Armament 3340 tons = 9 pct

Machinery ........................ 2550 tons = 7 pct
Hull and fittings; equipment ..... 13717 tons = 39 pct
Fuel, ammunition, stores ......... 6261 tons = 18 pct
Miscellaneous weights ............ 0 tons = 0 pct
-----
35443 tons = 100 pct

Estimated metacentric height, 7.1 ft

Displacement summary:

Light ship: 29182 tons
Standard displacement: 31349 tons
Normal service: 35443 tons
Full load: 38577 tons

Loading submergence 1498 tons/foot

+++++++++++++++++++++++++


Estimated overall survivability and seakeeping ability:

Relative margin of stability: 1.17

Shellfire needed to sink: 36814 lbs = 26.8 x 14.0-inch shells
(Approximates weight of penetrating
shell hits needed to sink ship,
not counting critical hits)

Torpedoes needed to sink: 5.2
(Approximates number of 'typical'
torpedo hits needed to sink ship)

Relative steadiness as gun platform, 57 percent
(50 percent is 'average')

Relative rocking effect from firing to beam, 0.48

Relative quality as a seaboat: 1.13

+++++++++++++++++++++++++


Hull form characteristics:

Block coefficient: 0.60
Sharpness coefficient: 0.41
Hull speed coefficient 'M' = 6.61
'Natural speed' for length = 26.6 knots
Power going to wave formation
at top speed: 45 percent


Estimated hull characteristics and strength:

Relative underwater volume absorbed by
magazines and engineering spaces: 92 percent

Relative accommodation and working space: 139 percent


Displacement factor: 107 percent
(Displacement relative to loading factors)


Relative cross-sectional hull strength: 1.01
(Structure weight per square
foot of hull surface: 197 lbs)

Relative longitudinal hull strength: 1.01
(for 18.0 ft average freeboard;
freeboard adjustment -1.5 ft)

Relative composite hull strength: 1.01

+++++++++++++++++++++++++


[Machine-readable parameters: Spring Style v. 1.2.1]

710.00 x 104.00 x 28.00; 18.00 -- Dimensions
0.60 -- Block coefficient
1914 -- Year laid down
24.50 / 17000 / 12.00; Oil-fired turbine or equivalent -- Speed / radius / cruise
0 tons -- Miscellaneous weights
++++++++++
12 x 14.00; 5; 2 -- Main battery; turrets; superfiring
:
16 x 5.00; 0 -- Secondary battery; turrets
Main deck battery
:
40 x 1.00 -- Tertiary (QF/AA) battery
Gun-shields
:
80 x 0.50 -- Fourth (light) battery
6 / 6 / 21.00 -- TT / submerged / size
++++++++++
12.00 / 3.00 / 8.00 / 2.00; 94 -- Belt armor; relative extent
2.00 / 11.00 -- Deck / CT
10.00 / 4.00 / 1.00 / 1.00 -- Battery armor


+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++



Rooijen10
Spammer wanna be
Posts: 13
(4/9/03 1:24:25 pm)
Re: Fuso development
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
April 6 saw a change in the AA guns. The layout was back at 6x2. Increase in caliber was offset by lower range. The laid down date remained at 1914.

Fuso Design VI

Fuso, laid down 1914

Length, 710 ft x Beam, 104.0 ft x Depth, 28.0 ft
35443 tons normal displacement (31573 tons standard)

Main battery: 12 x 14.0-inch (6 x 2; 2 superfiring)
Secondary battery: 16 x 5.0-inch
AA battery: 40 x 2.0-inch
Light battery: 80 x 1.0-inch

Weight of broadside: 17664 lbs

6 TT, 21.0" (submerged)

Main belt, 12.0 inches; bow and stern, 3.0 inches
Upper belt, 8.0 inches
Torpedo bulkhead, 2.0 inches
Armor deck, average 2.0 inches
C.T., 11.0 inches

Battery armor:
Main, 10.0" / secondary, 4.0"
AA, 1.0" shields / light guns, 1.0" shields

Maximum speed for 66209 shp = 24.50 knots
Approximate cruising radius, 16000 nm / 12 kts

Typical complement: 1292-1679


Estimated cost, $16.497 million (£4.124 million)

Remarks:

Oil firing.

Relative extent of belt armor, 94 percent of 'typical' coverage.

Ship is roomy, with superior accommodation and working space.

Main deck secondary guns subject to being washed down
in a seaway.


Distribution of weights:
Percent
normal
displacement:

Armament ......................... 2208 tons = 6 pct
Armor, total ..................... 10936 tons = 31 pct

Belt 4236 tons = 12 pct
Torpedo bulkhead 956 tons = 3 pct
Deck 1940 tons = 5 pct
C.T. 257 tons = 1 pct
Armament 3548 tons = 10 pct

Machinery ........................ 2550 tons = 7 pct
Hull and fittings; equipment ..... 13697 tons = 39 pct
Fuel, ammunition, stores ......... 6051 tons = 17 pct
Miscellaneous weights ............ 0 tons = 0 pct
-----
35443 tons = 100 pct

Estimated metacentric height, 7.1 ft

Displacement summary:

Light ship: 29392 tons
Standard displacement: 31573 tons
Normal service: 35443 tons
Full load: 38398 tons

Loading submergence 1498 tons/foot

+++++++++++++++++++++++++


Estimated overall survivability and seakeeping ability:

Relative margin of stability: 1.17

Shellfire needed to sink: 36471 lbs = 26.6 x 14.0-inch shells
(Approximates weight of penetrating
shell hits needed to sink ship,
not counting critical hits)

Torpedoes needed to sink: 5.1
(Approximates number of 'typical'
torpedo hits needed to sink ship)

Relative steadiness as gun platform, 56 percent
(50 percent is 'average')

Relative rocking effect from firing to beam, 0.49

Relative quality as a seaboat: 1.13

+++++++++++++++++++++++++


Hull form characteristics:

Block coefficient: 0.60
Sharpness coefficient: 0.41
Hull speed coefficient 'M' = 6.61
'Natural speed' for length = 26.6 knots
Power going to wave formation
at top speed: 45 percent


Estimated hull characteristics and strength:

Relative underwater volume absorbed by
magazines and engineering spaces: 92 percent

Relative accommodation and working space: 139 percent


Displacement factor: 106 percent
(Displacement relative to loading factors)


Relative cross-sectional hull strength: 1.02
(Structure weight per square
foot of hull surface: 197 lbs)

Relative longitudinal hull strength: 1.00
(for 18.0 ft average freeboard;
freeboard adjustment -1.5 ft)

Relative composite hull strength: 1.01

+++++++++++++++++++++++++


[Machine-readable parameters: Spring Style v. 1.2.1]

710.00 x 104.00 x 28.00; 18.00 -- Dimensions
0.60 -- Block coefficient
1914 -- Year laid down
24.50 / 16000 / 12.00; Oil-fired turbine or equivalent -- Speed / radius / cruise
0 tons -- Miscellaneous weights
++++++++++
12 x 14.00; 6; 2 -- Main battery; turrets; superfiring
:
16 x 5.00; 0 -- Secondary battery; turrets
Main deck battery
:
40 x 2.00 -- Tertiary (QF/AA) battery
Gun-shields
:
80 x 1.00 -- Fourth (light) battery
6 / 6 / 21.00 -- TT / submerged / size
++++++++++
12.00 / 3.00 / 8.00 / 2.00; 94 -- Belt armor; relative extent
2.00 / 11.00 -- Deck / CT
10.00 / 4.00 / 1.00 / 1.00 -- Battery armor


+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Rooijen10
Spammer wanna be
Posts: 14
(4/9/03 1:29:09 pm)
Re: Fuso development
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The latest design of the Fuso. One change was made: 75 tons of miscellaneous weight required for something. With this addition the Relative composite hull strength went from 1.01 to 1.00 without a caution. (I did have one with the Nagato design)

Fuso Design VII

uso, laid down 1914

Length, 710 ft x Beam, 104.0 ft x Depth, 28.0 ft
35443 tons normal displacement (31573 tons standard)

Main battery: 12 x 14.0-inch (6 x 2; 2 superfiring)
Secondary battery: 16 x 5.0-inch
AA battery: 40 x 2.0-inch
Light battery: 80 x 1.0-inch

Weight of broadside: 17664 lbs

6 TT, 21.0" (submerged)

Main belt, 12.0 inches; bow and stern, 3.0 inches
Upper belt, 8.0 inches
Torpedo bulkhead, 2.0 inches
Armor deck, average 2.0 inches
C.T., 11.0 inches

Battery armor:
Main, 10.0" / secondary, 4.0"
AA, 1.0" shields / light guns, 1.0" shields

Maximum speed for 66209 shp = 24.50 knots
Approximate cruising radius, 16000 nm / 12 kts

Typical complement: 1292-1679


Estimated cost, $16.497 million (£4.124 million)

Remarks:

Oil firing.

Relative extent of belt armor, 94 percent of 'typical' coverage.

Ship is roomy, with superior accommodation and working space.

Main deck secondary guns subject to being washed down
in a seaway.


Distribution of weights:
Percent
normal
displacement:

Armament ......................... 2208 tons = 6 pct
Armor, total ..................... 10936 tons = 31 pct

Belt 4236 tons = 12 pct
Torpedo bulkhead 956 tons = 3 pct
Deck 1940 tons = 5 pct
C.T. 257 tons = 1 pct
Armament 3548 tons = 10 pct

Machinery ........................ 2550 tons = 7 pct
Hull and fittings; equipment ..... 13622 tons = 38 pct
Fuel, ammunition, stores ......... 6051 tons = 17 pct
Miscellaneous weights ............ 75 tons = 0 pct
-----
35443 tons = 100 pct

Estimated metacentric height, 7.0 ft

Displacement summary:

Light ship: 29392 tons
Standard displacement: 31573 tons
Normal service: 35443 tons
Full load: 38398 tons

Loading submergence 1498 tons/foot

+++++++++++++++++++++++++


Estimated overall survivability and seakeeping ability:

Relative margin of stability: 1.16

Shellfire needed to sink: 36393 lbs = 26.5 x 14.0-inch shells
(Approximates weight of penetrating
shell hits needed to sink ship,
not counting critical hits)

Torpedoes needed to sink: 5.1
(Approximates number of 'typical'
torpedo hits needed to sink ship)

Relative steadiness as gun platform, 57 percent
(50 percent is 'average')

Relative rocking effect from firing to beam, 0.49

Relative quality as a seaboat: 1.13

+++++++++++++++++++++++++


Hull form characteristics:

Block coefficient: 0.60
Sharpness coefficient: 0.41
Hull speed coefficient 'M' = 6.61
'Natural speed' for length = 26.6 knots
Power going to wave formation
at top speed: 45 percent


Estimated hull characteristics and strength:

Relative underwater volume absorbed by
magazines and engineering spaces: 92 percent

Relative accommodation and working space: 139 percent


Displacement factor: 105 percent
(Displacement relative to loading factors)


Relative cross-sectional hull strength: 1.02
(Structure weight per square
foot of hull surface: 195 lbs)

Relative longitudinal hull strength: 1.00
(for 18.0 ft average freeboard;
freeboard adjustment -1.5 ft)

Relative composite hull strength: 1.00

+++++++++++++++++++++++++


[Machine-readable parameters: Spring Style v. 1.2.1]

710.00 x 104.00 x 28.00; 18.00 -- Dimensions
0.60 -- Block coefficient
1914 -- Year laid down
24.50 / 16000 / 12.00; Oil-fired turbine or equivalent -- Speed / radius / cruise
75 tons -- Miscellaneous weights
++++++++++
12 x 14.00; 6; 2 -- Main battery; turrets; superfiring
:
16 x 5.00; 0 -- Secondary battery; turrets
Main deck battery
:
40 x 2.00 -- Tertiary (QF/AA) battery
Gun-shields
:
80 x 1.00 -- Fourth (light) battery
6 / 6 / 21.00 -- TT / submerged / size
++++++++++
12.00 / 3.00 / 8.00 / 2.00; 94 -- Belt armor; relative extent
2.00 / 11.00 -- Deck / CT
10.00 / 4.00 / 1.00 / 1.00 -- Battery armor


+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++


AdmKuznetsov
Spammer wanna be
Posts: 4
(4/9/03 2:12:05 pm)
Re: Fuso development
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The 75 tons is important, for 2-3 aircraft. The USN worked on aerial spotting in the '20s, and found it significantly increased the effectiveness of long range (beyond 20,000 yds) fire. You never made a better investment of 75 tons

Fast, for 12x14" guns. The main battery turret armor is a concern though. Its actually lower than the belt, despite the fact that there's a good deal of cordite in there...

The deck is okay, for the time, but soon that 15"/42 will be showing up on HMS Queen Elizabeth, and <then> there will be worries about plunging fire.

I would seriously consider dropping your Fuso's speed back to 22-23 kts, and bulking up the main battery turret and the deck.

Visit my Russian/French fantasy fleet page:
EzCode Parsing Error:=admkuznetsov.tripod.com neww

Rooijen10
Spammer wanna be
Posts: 16
(4/9/03 2:44:04 pm)
Re: Fuso development
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I just used the 'springstyle rule' of minimal 25 tons for an aircraft. So that would be three of them.
Speed is 1 knot faster than historical. Turret armor is 1 inch thinner than the historical (a bit low. I might see if I can increase it a bit) but deck is a bit higher than historical. Historical at that time, Fuso's deck was 32-51mm (1.26" - 2.00") while this one is average of 2" (so maybe 1.5" - 2.5"). So the deck will be okay for now but probably needs to be increased during modernisation. While the last one is the latest, it probably won't be the last.

Walter

The Rock Doctor
Spammer wanna be
Posts: 19
(4/9/03 4:46:43 pm)
Re: Fuso development
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
So why retain a mere three inches along the fore and aft belts? That's not going to stop very much ordnance. Why not drop it to 0, and see if hull strength increases enough to raise freeboard a foot or two? Then those poor lads at the secondaries might get to stay dry...

The evolution of the design is interesting, particularly the 3-2-2-2-3 iteration.

AdmKuznetsov
Spammer wanna be
Posts: 7
(4/9/03 5:29:03 pm)
Re: Fuso development
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The only way I've found to keep the poor lads in the secondaries dry is to put them above the main deck. Even enough freebord to get "good seaboat" doesn't seem to help main deck secondaries.

Visit my Russian/French fantasy fleet page:
admkuznetsov.tripod.com

Rooijen10
Spammer wanna be
Posts: 17
(4/10/03 12:08:47 pm)
Re: Fuso development
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Quoted

Then those poor lads at the secondaries might get to stay dry...




Well, if those guys want to stay dry, then they shouldn't have joined the navy.

Walter