You are not logged in.

Dear visitor, welcome to WesWorld. If this is your first visit here, please read the Help. It explains in detail how this page works. To use all features of this page, you should consider registering. Please use the registration form, to register here or read more information about the registration process. If you are already registered, please login here.

1

Friday, April 8th 2005, 5:23pm

???????????????????????//

I found a little problem in the C.T. and hopefully one of you can clarify....
Class 1 subs - 1500 or 2000 tons????
Both sizes are mentioned in the text.

2

Friday, April 8th 2005, 5:28pm

1500

The 2000t displacement is found in the definitions part I believe.

3

Friday, April 8th 2005, 5:52pm

but which is right?
I ask because the 450 ton limit for the class 2 subs is not mentioned in the body of the treaty.

4

Friday, April 8th 2005, 6:13pm

Ah, damn. It is 1500 t.

If I recall - now that my memory's been jogged - the 2000 t was to allow retention of existing big subs if somebody had them. They just weren't to be built afterward.

5

Friday, April 8th 2005, 7:07pm

Battle-subs

What will this do to the Battle-submarines and carrier-submarines?

Actually, has anyone though about a submersible aircraft carrier? I mean with something like a lighter carrier's compliment of fighters....in the modern era, VTOL it would be possible, though today it isn't really needed, as the only nations that could afford such a task already have carriers and don't need to hide them.