You are not logged in.

Dear visitor, welcome to WesWorld. If this is your first visit here, please read the Help. It explains in detail how this page works. To use all features of this page, you should consider registering. Please use the registration form, to register here or read more information about the registration process. If you are already registered, please login here.

1

Tuesday, June 10th 2003, 1:05am

WW1 destroyer

How does this look?

DD32, Atlantis destroyer laid down 1916

Displacement:
1,243 t light; 1,281 t standard; 1,385 t normal; 1,462 t full load
Loading submergence 167 tons/feet

Dimensions:
324.00 ft x 32.00 ft x 11.00 ft (normal load)
98.76 m x 9.75 m x 3.35 m

Armament:
4 - 4.00" / 102 mm guns
2 - 1.00" / 25 mm AA guns
Weight of broadside 129 lbs / 59 kg
4 - 21.0" / 533.4 mm above water torpedoes

Machinery:
Oil fired boilers, steam turbines,
Direct drive, 2 shafts, 36,312 shp / 27,089 Kw = 33.05 kts
Range 5,000nm at 10.00 kts

Complement:
113 - 147

Cost:
£0.277 million / $1.108 million

Distribution of weights at normal displacement:
Armament: 16 tons, 1.2 %
Machinery: 802 tons, 57.9 %
Hull, fittings & equipment: 405 tons, 29.2 %
Fuel, ammunition & stores: 142 tons, 10.3 %
Miscellaneous weights: 20 tons, 1.4 %

Metacentric height 1.6

Remarks:
Caution: Hull subject to strain in open-sea
Hull space for machinery, storage & compartmentation is cramped
Room for accommodation & workspaces is adequate
Good seaboat, rides out heavy weather easily

Estimated overall survivability and seakeeping ability:
Relative margin of stability: 1.40
Shellfire needed to sink: 355 lbs / 161 Kg = 11.1 x 4.0 " / 102 mm shells
(Approx weight of penetrating shell hits needed to sink ship excluding critical hits)
Torpedoes needed to sink: 0.2
(Approx number of typical torpedo hits needed to sink ship)
Relative steadiness as gun platform: 61 %
(Average = 50 %)
Relative rocking effect from firing to beam: 0.14
Relative quality as seaboat: 1.21

Hull form characteristics:
Block coefficient: 0.425
Sharpness coefficient: 0.30
Hull speed coefficient 'M': 8.88
'Natural speed' for length: 18.00 kts
Power going to wave formation at top speed: 69 %
Trim: 51
(Maximise stabilty/flotation = 0, Maximise steadiness/seakeeping = 100)

Estimated hull characteristics & strength:
Underwater volume absorbed by magazines and engineering spaces: 197.2 %
Relative accommodation and working space: 115.7 %
(Average = 100%)
Displacement factor: 49 %
(Displacement relative to loading factors)
Relative cross-sectional hull strength: 0.51
(Structure weight / hull surface area: 34 lbs / square foot or 166 Kg / square metre)
Relative longitudinal hull strength: 1.65
(for 16.00 ft / 4.88 m average freeboard, freeboard adjustment 5.80 ft)
Relative composite hull strength: 0.58

HoOmAn

Keeper of the Sacred Block Coefficient

  • Send private message

2

Tuesday, June 10th 2003, 2:14am

Look?

Well, no idea how it "looks" without a drawing but its stats seem to be quite good. :o)

3

Tuesday, June 10th 2003, 2:47am

lol

I'll take that as a yes Hoo. So you don't see any major flaws?

HoOmAn

Keeper of the Sacred Block Coefficient

  • Send private message

4

Tuesday, June 10th 2003, 12:19pm

Hmmm.....

Well, when you really ask for it..... It could have a greater range. though, but on the other hand you sealines are not as strechted as mine are...

Just a thought. It is one of the best DD designs I´ve seen so far.

5

Tuesday, June 10th 2003, 10:15pm

well

I tried basing it on the British V/W class destroyers but i couldn't get the speed as high as them in 1916 instead of the year the British ships were built (1918).