You are not logged in.

1

Sunday, May 25th 2003, 7:37pm

Iberian sloop - draft design

Hi folks. comments please?

cheers

Bernhard

Rosinante, Iberia Fregata laid down 1921

Displacement:
841 t light; 864 t standard; 974 t normal; 1,058 t full load
Loading submergence 121 tons/feet

Dimensions:
213.25 ft x 29.53 ft x 9.84 ft (normal load)
65.00 m x 9.00 m x 3.00 m

Armament:
1 - 3.94" / 100 mm guns
2 - 2.24" / 57 mm guns
4 - 0.53" / 14 mm guns
Weight of broadside 42 lbs / 19 kg

Armour:
Main gun shields 0.79" / 20 mm

Machinery:
Diesel Internal combustion motors,
Direct drive, 1 shaft, 6,062 shp / 4,522 Kw = 21.00 kts
Range 5,000nm at 12.00 kts

Complement:
87 - 113

Cost:
£0.161 million / $0.642 million

Distribution of weights at normal displacement:
Armament: 5 tons, 0.5 %
Armour: 1 tons, 0.1 %
Belts: 0 tons, 0.0 %, Armament: 1 tons, 0.1 %, Armour Deck: 0 tons, 0.0 %
Conning Tower: 0 tons, 0.0 %, Torpedo bulkhead: 0 tons, 0.0 %
Machinery: 209 tons, 21.4 %
Hull, fittings & equipment: 551 tons, 56.6 %
Fuel, ammunition & stores: 133 tons, 13.6 %
Miscellaneous weights: 75 tons, 7.7 %

Metacentric height 0.8

Remarks:
Hull space for machinery, storage & compartmentation is excellent
Room for accommodation & workspaces is excellent
Ship has slow, easy roll, a good, steady gun platform
Good seaboat, rides out heavy weather easily

Estimated overall survivability and seakeeping ability:
Relative margin of stability: 1.02
Shellfire needed to sink: 1,558 lbs / 707 Kg = 51.1 x 3.9 " / 100 mm shells
(Approx weight of penetrating shell hits needed to sink ship excluding critical hits)
Torpedoes needed to sink: 0.7
(Approx number of typical torpedo hits needed to sink ship)
Relative steadiness as gun platform: 70 %
(Average = 50 %)
Relative rocking effect from firing to beam: 0.08
Relative quality as seaboat: 1.32

Hull form characteristics:
Block coefficient: 0.550
Sharpness coefficient: 0.39
Hull speed coefficient 'M': 6.57
'Natural speed' for length: 14.60 kts
Power going to wave formation at top speed: 65 %
Trim: 53
(Maximise stabilty/flotation = 0, Maximise steadiness/seakeeping = 100)

Estimated hull characteristics & strength:
Underwater volume absorbed by magazines and engineering spaces: 82.8 %
Relative accommodation and working space: 121.2 %
(Average = 100%)
Displacement factor: 182 %
(Displacement relative to loading factors)
Relative cross-sectional hull strength: 1.53
(Structure weight / hull surface area: 73 lbs / square foot or 358 Kg / square metre)
Relative longitudinal hull strength: 5.52
(for 13.12 ft / 4.00 m average freeboard, freeboard adjustment 3.62 ft)
Relative composite hull strength: 1.74

14 mm is actually 13.5 mm - HMGs in 13.5 mm Russian


HoOmAn

Keeper of the Sacred Block Coefficient

  • Send private message

2

Sunday, May 25th 2003, 7:49pm

Comments?

Comment: It´s a sloop.....

*shrug shoulders*

3

Sunday, May 25th 2003, 8:59pm

well

My knowledge of sloops is limited but judging by WW2 standards your 1921 design looks ok. Shes a good seaboat and her armament is not bad.

4

Sunday, May 25th 2003, 9:57pm

I actually have the same prob: documentation on sloops from that time is sparse to non existing. That is why I was asing for input.

I know 17inc's Wagga class is turbine driven but that feels wrong to me. I was torn between reciprocating steam and diesel. Weirdly enough reciprocating makes the boat more expensive. I find that hard to believe....

cheers

Bernhard

5

Sunday, May 25th 2003, 10:11pm

British and Indian sloops built 1928 onwards had turbines, I have no sources of earleir sloops of these navies. French sloops in WW2, the oldest from 1931, had diesels. Two Netherlands sloops from 1925 had triple expansion machinery.

6

Monday, May 26th 2003, 11:33pm

Thanks Pengolodh, that was what I was looking for.

well, i figure the Armada is doing enough revolutionary stuff at the mom, so triple expansion engines it is:

Rosinante, Iberia Fregata laid down 1921

Displacement:
806 t light; 829 t standard; 974 t normal; 1,086 t full load
Loading submergence 121 tons/feet

Dimensions:
213.25 ft x 29.53 ft x 9.84 ft (normal load)
65.00 m x 9.00 m x 3.00 m

Armament:
1 - 3.94" / 100 mm guns
2 - 2.24" / 57 mm guns
4 - 0.53" / 14 mm guns
Weight of broadside 42 lbs / 19 kg

Armour:
Main gun shields 0.79" / 20 mm

Machinery:
Oil fired boilers, complex reciprocating steam engines,
Direct drive, 1 shaft, 3,192 ihp / 2,381 Kw = 18.00 kts
Range 5,000nm at 12.00 kts

Complement:
87 - 113

Cost:
£0.150 million / $0.598 million

Distribution of weights at normal displacement:
Armament: 5 tons, 0.5 %
Armour: 1 tons, 0.1 %
Belts: 0 tons, 0.0 %, Armament: 1 tons, 0.1 %, Armour Deck: 0 tons, 0.0 %
Conning Tower: 0 tons, 0.0 %, Torpedo bulkhead: 0 tons, 0.0 %
Machinery: 187 tons, 19.2 %
Hull, fittings & equipment: 538 tons, 55.2 %
Fuel, ammunition & stores: 168 tons, 17.3 %
Miscellaneous weights: 75 tons, 7.7 %

Metacentric height 0.8

Remarks:
Hull space for machinery, storage & compartmentation is excellent
Room for accommodation & workspaces is excellent
Ship has slow, easy roll, a good, steady gun platform
Excellent seaboat, comfortable and able to fight her guns in the heaviest weather

Estimated overall survivability and seakeeping ability:
Relative margin of stability: 1.03
Shellfire needed to sink: 1,716 lbs / 778 Kg = 56.2 x 3.9 " / 100 mm shells
(Approx weight of penetrating shell hits needed to sink ship excluding critical hits)
Torpedoes needed to sink: 0.8
(Approx number of typical torpedo hits needed to sink ship)
Relative steadiness as gun platform: 100 %
(Average = 50 %)
Relative rocking effect from firing to beam: 0.10
Relative quality as seaboat: 2.00

Hull form characteristics:
Block coefficient: 0.550
Sharpness coefficient: 0.39
Hull speed coefficient 'M': 6.57
'Natural speed' for length: 14.60 kts
Power going to wave formation at top speed: 57 %
Trim: 53
(Maximise stabilty/flotation = 0, Maximise steadiness/seakeeping = 100)

Estimated hull characteristics & strength:
Underwater volume absorbed by magazines and engineering spaces: 75.5 %
Relative accommodation and working space: 121.2 %
(Average = 100%)
Displacement factor: 198 %
(Displacement relative to loading factors)
Relative cross-sectional hull strength: 1.53
(Structure weight / hull surface area: 72 lbs / square foot or 349 Kg / square metre)
Relative longitudinal hull strength: 5.39
(for 13.12 ft / 4.00 m average freeboard, freeboard adjustment 3.62 ft)
Relative composite hull strength: 1.73

14 mm is actually 13.5 mm - HMGs in 13.5 mm Russian