You are not logged in.

Dear visitor, welcome to WesWorld. If this is your first visit here, please read the Help. It explains in detail how this page works. To use all features of this page, you should consider registering. Please use the registration form, to register here or read more information about the registration process. If you are already registered, please login here.

1

Monday, January 2nd 2017, 9:49pm

Peru 2nd Quarter 1945

Peruvian Naval Program, 2nd Quarter 1945

Production

Available Factories: 4.0
Producing Warship Material: 2.0
Tonnage Produced: 2,000
Producing Infrastructure (Committed): 2.0
Producing Infrastructure (Non - Committed): 0.0
Infrastructure Points Produced: 0.2
Bonus IP for Committed Factories: 0.0
Total IP Available: 0.2
Tonnage Produced: 2,000
Proceeds from Ship Sales: 0
Tonnage Recovered from Scrapping: 0
Tonnage Previously Stockpiled: 4,624
Total Tonnage Available: 6,624
Tonnage Transferred Out: 0
Tonnage Used in Construction: 2,350
Tonnage Remaining for Stockpile: 4,274

Infrastructure Development

Infrastructure Project -:- IP Req -:- IP Added -:- IP To Date -:- IP Remain
Expand Callao Slipway No.5 to Type 1.0 -:- 0.5 -:- 0.1 -:- 0.2 -:- 0.3
Expand Mollendo Dock No.1 to Type 1.0 -:- 1.0 -:- 0.1 -:- 0.2 -:- 0.8

Construction

Servicios Industriales de la Marina, Callao

Dry Dock No.1 – Type 3.0 – Idle

Dry Dock No.2 – Type 2.5 – Idle

Dry Dock No.3 – Type 1.0 – Training Ship Training Ship Ayachuco – Laid down 1 January 1945; requires 1,279 tons. 320 tons previously committed, receives 320 tons, 639 tons remaining. Launched 30 June 1945

Slipway No.1 – Type 2.5 – Idle

Slipway No.2 – Type 2.0 – Coastal Transport Santillana – Laid down 1 January 1945; requires 1,189 tons. 200 tons previously committed, receives 300 tons, 589 tons remaining. Launched 30 June 1945

Slipway No.3 – Type 1.0 – Destroyer Montero – Laid down 1 January 1945; requires 1,660 tons. 415 tons previously committed, receives 415 tons, 830 tons remaining. Launched 31 May 1945

Slipway No.4 – Type 1.0 – Laid down 1 January 1945; requires 1,660 tons. 415 tons previously committed, receives 415 tons, 830 tons remaining. Launched 31 May 1945

Slipway No.5 – Type 0.0 – Expansion under construction (due Dec 1945)

Slipway No.6 – Type 0.0 – Corvette Maranon – Laid down 1 January 1945; requires 512 tons. 150 tons previously committed, receives 150 tons, 212 tons remaining. Launched 1 May 1945

Slipway No.6 – Type 0.0 Corvette Castilla – Laid down 1 Jun 1945; requires 512 tons. 0 tons previously committed, receives 150 ton, 362 ton remaining.

Slipway No.7 – Type 0.0 – Corvette Clavero – Laid down 1 January 1945; requires 512 tons. 150 tons previously committed, receives 150 tons, 212 tons remaining. Launched 1 May 1945

Slipway No.7 – Type 0.0 – Corvette Velarde – Laid down 1 Jun 1945; requires 512 tons. 0 tons previously committed, receives 150 tons, 362 tons remaining


Servicios Industriales de la Marina, Mollendo

Dry Dock No.1 – Type 0.0 – Expansion under construction (due Dec 1946)

Slipway No.1 – Type 0.0 – Coastal Transport Herrera – Laid down 1 January 1945; requires 1,189 tons. 200 tons previously committed, receives 300 tons, 589 tons remaining. Launched 30 June 1945

Slipway No.2 – Type 0.0 – Idle

Slipway No.3 – Type 0.0 – Idle

Slipway No.4 – Type 0.0 – Idle


Conversions and Refits: None

Small Craft Acquisition: None

Transactions: None

Scrapping Activities: None


Vessels Laid Down This Quarter:

Corvette Castilla
Corvette Velarde

Vessels Launched This Quarter:

Training Ship Ayachuco
Destroyer Montero
Destroyer Mariategui
Corvette Maranon
Corvette Clavero
Coastal Transport Santillana
Coastal Transport Herrera

Vessels Completed This Quarter: None

Vessels Undergoing Trials This Quarter:

None

Vessels Completing Trials This Quarter:

Heavy Destroyer Coraje (completed 30 June 1945)
Sloop Rio Yavari (completed 30 June 1945)


Order of Battle

Type : In Service + Trials + Building + Refitting + Converting = Total
Battlecruisers : 1 + 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 = 1
Aircraft Carriers : 1 + 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 = 1
Heavy Cruisers : 1 + 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 = 1
Light Cruisers : 4 + 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 = 4
Training Vessels : 1 + 0 + 1 + 0 + 0 = 2
Destroyers : 25 + 0 + 2 + 0 + 0 = 27
Torpedo Boats : 8 + 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 = 8
Sloops : 6 + 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 = 6
Corvettes : 0 + 0 + 4 + 0 + 0 = 2
Submarines : 18 + 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 = 18
Minelayers : 3 + 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 = 3
Minesweepers : 10 + 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 = 10
Submarine Chasers : 23 + 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 = 23
Motor Torpedo Boats : 8 + 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 = 8
Patrol Boats : 27 + 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 = 27
Transports : 1 + 0 + 2 + 0 + 0 = 3
Tenders : 1 + 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 = 1
Landing Craft : 8 + 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 = 8
Hospital Ships : 1 + 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 = 1
Salvage Tugs : 2 + 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 = 2
Harbor Tugs : 6 + 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 = 6
Boom Defense Ships : 4 + 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 = 4

2

Tuesday, January 3rd 2017, 12:20am

I didn't notice this in the first sim report, but I see you're doing some infrastructure improvements in Mollendo?

3

Tuesday, January 3rd 2017, 12:57am

I didn't notice this in the first sim report, but I see you're doing some infrastructure improvements in Mollendo?


Indeed, the dry dock there is being expanded to a Type 1.0 from the current Type 0.0

4

Tuesday, January 3rd 2017, 2:19am

Mkay.

I think I've said this to previous Peruvian players, but I'll mention it again for your benefit. I know Mollendo's been used as one of Peru's WW naval bases for ages... but it really isn't a great port city by almost any stretch. There's no shelter in bad weather and the nearby coastline is hazardous to navigation. About the only thing going for it is the long, broad beach which made the town attractive for surfing and amphibious assaults. *Cough cough.*

The town of Matarani which is 6 miles north has a breakwater and a sheltered anchorage sufficient for 2-3 large cargo ships, though; and it hosts the region's artisanal fishing fleet.

Perhaps the Peruvians are making a big old breakwater and other 'port improvements' as part of the expansion of the drydock? Probably would be desirable if you want to host ships much larger than MTBs. ;)

5

Tuesday, January 3rd 2017, 2:54am

Doing a few moments research leads me to the same conclusion.

However, since the infrastructure in question has been assigned to "Mollendo" for ages, I am not certain how the player base would react to any change. Re-labeling my reports would be easy enough, particularly at this stage of things - and it would be a quick solution to the issue. Or we presume that "Mollendo" refers to the district and Matarani is a part of it - the part with the port.

6

Tuesday, January 3rd 2017, 3:12am

However, since the infrastructure in question has been assigned to "Mollendo" for ages, I am not certain how the player base would react to any change. Re-labeling my reports would be easy enough, particularly at this stage of things - and it would be a quick solution to the issue. Or we presume that "Mollendo" refers to the district and Matarani is a part of it - the part with the port.

I'd be fine with referring to it as the district, and presuming the yard is in Matarani (it's definitely a cramped location, but more suitable than Mollendo itself). I'd also be fine with re-labeling it "Mollendo / Matarani" - or even just making a presumption that some port features, such as a breakwater, have been / are being built in order to accommodate the expansion of the base.

I mean, it's not like you've got many other good options for a base south of Lima-Callao. *shrugs* Northern Chile's actually got similar problems, with very few ports capable of handling more than a few small fishing craft...

7

Tuesday, January 3rd 2017, 3:23am

Well, in the south, there is Ilo, which if nothing else, is home to the Peruvian Naval Museum.

I would prefer to subsume Matarani under the aegis of the Mollendo District - even if OTL Peru doesn't. I think I will need to extend the railroad.