The Wehrgedanken des Auslands staff looks at recent naval progress in the Kingdom of Nordmark.
The Royal Nordish Navy faces numerous challenges – some operational, imposed by the requirements to defend far-flung possessions; others stem from the nature of its past procurement policies, which have led to periodic issues of bloc obsolescence in the fleet’s materiel. Past Governments have sought to address these and other issues in a variety of ways, with differing results; however, the present Government has adopted a policy that will change the face of the Royal Nordish Navy in substantial degree, and it is worthwhile to consider the latest developments there as they relate to general progress elsewhere.
Capital Ships
The Nordish battle fleet comprises but five battleships and three battlecruisers, and suffers from growing obsolescence. The battleships consist of the three vessels of the
Oscar II class, built in the early 1930s, the two ships of the
Odin class, originally constructed in 1924 and refitted in the late 1930s. The battlecruisers comprise the two refitted vessels of the
Dristigheten class, which though modernised in 1937 date from before the Great War and the modern
Gota Lejon II, completed in 1942.
The vessels of the
Oscar II class are very economical vessels, with powerful main batteries and are well defended against aircraft threats. However, their fire control and electronic suites are now well out of date and require modernisation. The two vessels of the
Odin class, though equipped with a decent antiaircraft outfit during their refit in the mid-1930s, suffer from the same issue. Compared with other European navies the Nordish fleet has failed to keep pace with the electronics revolution.
The
Manligheten and
Tapperheten, survivors of the three-ship
Dristigheten class, show their age. Compared with modern vessels of the type they are slow, though equipped with very powerful main batteries and, after refit, quite capable antiaircraft defences. However, they too suffer from a lack of modern electronics.
The battlecruiser
Gota Lejon, laid down in 1940, heralded a sea-change in the Nordish approach to capital ships – fast, well-armed with nine 30.5cm main guns and a powerful secondary battery of 13cm dual purpose guns – she appeared to be the lead-ship of a class intended to escort Nordmark’s growing force of aircraft carriers. (See Note 1 below). Unfortunately, this putative class has fallen victim to changing requirements. She remains the sole ship of her class, and the recent concentration of Nordish construction in other areas suggests that she will remain so.
Aircraft Carriers
Following the sale of the aircraft carrier
Gåssen to the Kriegsmarine, the Royal Nordish Navy presently comprises five operational aircraft carriers plus the aviation training vessel
Gärdsmyg. This force comprises the two ships of the
Orn class, laid down in 1931, the
Hok, laid down in 1937 and the two ships of the
Gam class which date from 1940.
At the time of their construction the
Orn and her sister-ship
Falk were state of the art – speedy, weatherly vessels capable of operating up to sixty aircraft. Provided with a refit in the late 1930s (see Note 2) they are expected to remain in service pending a decision on their replacement.
The
Hok, at 20,000 tons represented some advance on the smaller
Orn and
Falk, but the result was a very well-balanced vessel – sufficient armour protection, excellent antiaircraft defences for the time, an adequate air group and deck-edge lift to increase handling. However, she has not been refitted since her commissioning, and lacks modern fire control and electronic detection equipment, the provision of which should be a priority.
The two vessels of the
Gam-class, laid down in 1940, represent a significant advance on previous Nordish carrier design – far larger than their predecessors, featuring twelve 13cm dual-purpose and no fewer than sixty-four 4cm antiaircraft guns, and capable of operating eighty-four aircraft (see Note 3 below). However they too lack for modern aircraft detection and fire control equipment.
The Royal Nordish Navy has projected construction of a new design to meet its aviation needs. The project (see Note 4 below) features increased defensive armament and the modern electronic systems. Despite the intention of replacing the older Orn, Falk and Hok with vessels of this type funding has not yet been provided to commence construction.
The abortive
Ocean class of light aircraft carriers (see Note 5 below) offer an insight into the operational dilemma facing Nordmark. With an extensive merchant fleet and widely scattered overseas possessions there is a need for carrier-based aviation in many areas; however the existing fleet carriers are too few in number and too large for many overseas deployments. Offering a certain amount of economy the
Norskehavet and her sister
Atlanten might have proven the answer to Nordmark’s needs. A change in policy saw their sale to Turkey in 1940, before completion. To date their record in Turkish service has been undistinguished though they certainly add to that fleet’s striking power.
Cruisers
The state of the cruiser force of the Royal Nordish Navy illustrates how conflicting requirements can force themselves upon a naval force. Overall it is large in size – no fewer than five heavy and forty-nine light units are presently in service, with a further eight light cruisers under construction – but far too many of the ships are elderly and in need of modernisation or replacement.
The heavy cruisers
Gjøvik and
Røros date to 1925, but have recently been refitted (see Note 6 below) and emerged as excellent, well-balanced vessels. Their increased antiaircraft outfit of 11 cm and 4 cm guns are enhanced by the addition of modern electronics and fire control equipment – among the first Nordish vessels to be so fitted. Their large radius of action fits them well for overseas deployments to protect Nordmark’s more distant possessions.
In contrast the two vessels of the
Stockholm class, laid down in 1931, have not been modernised despite their long service. Their dual-purpose 11cm batteries, though powerful, required the same sort of advanced fire control equipment now fitted to the
Gjøviks; this does not appear to be forthcoming however – the funding that would have gone to reconstructing the two
Stockholms has been applied to construction of the new
Tiermes class light cruisers (see below).
The large heavy cruiser
Falun, constructed between 1937 and 1939, is another interesting design that has fallen victim to changing requirements. Comparing favourably in size with the large heavy cruisers of the British and Canadian navies she features a powerful main battery of 24cm guns backed by numerous 11cm dual purpose secondary guns. Well-armoured and possessing a very large high speed radius of action she would be an excellent escort for a carrier task force; however, she is the single representative of her class – and this would condemn her to fulfilling the role of long-distance surface raider.
In the modern era the traditional
Handelskrieg is a questionable doctrine, though one still held by many of Nordmark’s potential adversaries. As such the
Falun could fulfil the role of the hunter – her long range gunnery and high speed would make her a formidable opponent. She needs to be refitted with modern fire control and electronic equipment (see Note 7 below) in line with many other of Nordmark’s larger vessels.
The light cruiser force of the Royal Nordish Navy is quite large, as befits a fleet committed to trade protection as well as screening major task forces, and it is an aspect of the fleet that has received considerable attention in recent years.
The large light cruisers of the
Victoriahamn and
Luleå classes, which date from 1937 and 1939 respectively, are well armed and serviceable vessels, well protected and capable of long steaming at high speeds. Whether employed to screen units of the fleet, or to form hunting groups to track down independent raiders, they are equipped to function quite well. They are in need of the addition of modern electronic detection and fire control systems to make best use of their powerful secondary dual purpose and tertiary antiaircraft batteries.
Too many of the older Nordish light cruisers are elderly, and of limited employment despite refits obtained during the early 1930s. The
Odin (or
Sigtuna) class of 1930 are showing their age, and would require very extensive refits to bring them up to reasonably modern standards. The
Sleipner class of 1933 are adequate for service on distant stations, but lack a sufficient antiaircraft armament to resist air attack on the scale that might be expected in European waters. The
Lillehammer class of 1923 was refitted in 1938, and is still deficient in antiaircraft armament. The surviving
Kirkjubæjarklaustur and the
Grindavik class cruisers, built in 1919 and 1917 respectively, though refitted in the early 1930s, should soon join their contemporaries of the
Tampere class on the disposal list.
The Royal Nordish Navy has recognised this deficiency and has set about constructing no fewer than sixteen units of the
Tiermes class to replace its older light cruisers. Based upon a proposal submitted by the Deschimag concern (see Note 8 below) they represent a slight advance in tonnage over the vessels they are replacing but feature more than sufficient armament for the trade protection role, antiaircraft defences on the modern scale, adequate protection and a good turn of speed. The lead ship,
Tiermes, was laid down and the summer of 1943 and has recently passed into service, quickly followed by the first of her sisters.
In this respect the Nordish fleet has been augmented with a large number of excellent vessels, but their rapid construction will, at some point in the future, force the Royal Nordish Navy to confront the question of bloc obsolescence of its cruiser force again. It remains to be seen whether this will become a pattern in future Nordish naval programmes or whether the Nordish Admiralty will adopt a more balanced approach to meeting its future needs.
Destroyers
The flotillas of the Royal Nordish Navy are constrained, to a significant degree, by the general conservatism of the Nordish Admiralty design department. The most recently completed craft of the
D37 class (8 units) and
D38 class (24 units) are adequate for screening battle units in the confined waters of the Baltic but would suffer badly from the stormy waters of the North or South Atlantic in the winter months. These relatively modern vessels are equipped with modern antisubmarine detection equipment and weaponry, and in the role of submarine-hunter would give good service. Alas, in common with other Nordish vessels they are not yet equipped with electronic detection equipment or modern fire control apparatus.
This deficiency has been addressed in the latest Nordish destroyer design, the
D45 class (see Note 9 below) of which ten units have been authorised thus far. Unfortunately, the new design has inherited the smaller dimensions its predecessors and, coupled with the top weight of a heavy armament, torpedo battery and modern electronic, are likely to suffer badly in winter gales.
While the destroyers constructed for the Royal Nordish Navy may be conservative in the tonnage and dimensions, if not armament, this is not to suggest that Nordish naval constructors cannot be innovative in their thinking. The abortive “Project 35” large destroyers (see Note 10 below) would seem to have been constructed to match the numerous ‘torpedo cruisers’ of the Russian Federation Navy. Had they been built, they would have been speedy, weatherly vessels with a powerful dual purpose armament and hard-hitting torpedo battery. Though large, they would have been quite useful in screening a battle force on the high seas.
Disposals and Requirements
The issue of obsolescence that impacts much of the Nordish fleet can be seen in the lengthy list of vessels offered for sale, or intended for scrapping. These include such ships as the surviving
Tampere class cruisers, the minelaying cruisers
Ve and
Vale, various destroyers, torpedo boats and escort ships, as well as the ancient troop transports
Drottningholm and
Stavangerfjord. Not surprisingly, given the age of many of these ships, there have been few takers.
There have been paper studies for smaller ocean escort ships, a type needed to replace the elderly craft now up for disposal as well as to relieve older destroyers ill-suited to modern antisubmarine warfare. With current construction focused on the remaining Tiermes class cruisers and the new D45 destroyers it remains to be seen whether such craft as have been posited will in fact be funded.
To remain viable, the Nordish fleet needs to equip itself with modern electronic equipment; that lack has been noted throughout this analysis. Moreover, it needs to determine its focus – either to seek to secure its sea communications with North America or to operate in defence of trade on the Seven Seas. Nordmark would be hard-pressed to attempt both.
Note 1: Details of the Gota Lejon (ii) can be found here:
Note 2: The Nordish sim reports show that the
Orn and
Falk were refitted sometime around 1938/39; however, I have not yet found a Springsharp detailing the work performed on them.
Note 3: Details of the Gam class can be found here:
Note 4: Details of the projected vessel can be found here:
Note 5: Details of the Ocean class can be found here:
Note 6: Details of the Gjøvik class refit can be found here:
Note 7: Unless the posted Springsharp indicates provision of radar in the breakdown of miscellaneous weight my presumption is that such equipment was not fitted at time of construction. Few details of Nordish radar have been posted.
Note 8: Details of what I presume to be the Tiermes class can be found here:
Note 9: Details of the new Nordish destroyer design can be found here:
Note 10: Details of this “never were” design can be found here: