Source code |
|
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 |
Tiermes, Nordmark Light Cruiser laid down 1943 Displacement: 5,531 t light; 5,808 t standard; 6,498 t normal; 7,050 t full load Dimensions: Length overall / water x beam x draught 477.75 ft / 459.32 ft x 52.49 ft x 16.40 ft (normal load) 145.62 m / 140.00 m x 16.00 m x 5.00 m Armament: 8 - 5.91" / 150 mm guns (4x2 guns), 102.98lbs / 46.71kg shells, 1943 Model Breech loading guns in turrets (on barbettes) on centreline ends, evenly spread, 2 raised mounts - superfiring 8 - 4.33" / 110 mm guns (4x2 guns), 40.61lbs / 18.42kg shells, 1943 Model Dual purpose guns in deck mounts with hoists on side, all amidships 32 - 1.57" / 40.0 mm guns (4x8 guns), 1.95lbs / 0.89kg shells, 1943 Model Anti-aircraft guns in deck mounts with hoists on side, all amidships, all raised mounts - superfiring Weight of broadside 1,211 lbs / 549 kg Shells per gun, main battery: 200 8 - 24.0" / 610 mm above water torpedoes Armour: - Belts: Width (max) Length (avg) Height (avg) Main: 2.95" / 75 mm 321.52 ft / 98.00 m 16.40 ft / 5.00 m Ends: Unarmoured Main Belt covers 108 % of normal length - Gun armour: Face (max) Other gunhouse (avg) Barbette/hoist (max) Main: 3.94" / 100 mm 2.95" / 75 mm 2.95" / 75 mm 2nd: 1.97" / 50 mm 0.98" / 25 mm 0.98" / 25 mm 3rd: 0.98" / 25 mm 0.39" / 10 mm 0.98" / 25 mm - Armour deck: 0.98" / 25 mm, Conning tower: 3.94" / 100 mm Machinery: Oil fired boilers, steam turbines, Geared drive, 2 shafts, 50,297 shp / 37,522 Kw = 30.00 kts Range 2,500nm at 24.00 kts Bunker at max displacement = 1,241 tons Complement: 361 - 470 Cost: £3.290 million / $13.160 million Distribution of weights at normal displacement: Armament: 151 tons, 2.3 % Armour: 1,296 tons, 19.9 % - Belts: 650 tons, 10.0 % - Torpedo bulkhead: 0 tons, 0.0 % - Armament: 290 tons, 4.5 % - Armour Deck: 327 tons, 5.0 % - Conning Tower: 30 tons, 0.5 % Machinery: 1,299 tons, 20.0 % Hull, fittings & equipment: 2,604 tons, 40.1 % Fuel, ammunition & stores: 967 tons, 14.9 % Miscellaneous weights: 180 tons, 2.8 % Overall survivability and seakeeping ability: Survivability (Non-critical penetrating hits needed to sink ship): 9,714 lbs / 4,406 Kg = 94.3 x 5.9 " / 150 mm shells or 1.5 torpedoes Stability (Unstable if below 1.00): 1.10 Metacentric height 2.3 ft / 0.7 m Roll period: 14.6 seconds Steadiness - As gun platform (Average = 50 %): 51 % - Recoil effect (Restricted arc if above 1.00): 0.55 Seaboat quality (Average = 1.00): 0.99 Hull form characteristics: Hull has a flush deck and transom stern Block coefficient: 0.575 Length to Beam Ratio: 8.75 : 1 'Natural speed' for length: 24.51 kts Power going to wave formation at top speed: 63 % Trim (Max stability = 0, Max steadiness = 100): 51 Bow angle (Positive = bow angles forward): 30.00 degrees Stern overhang: 3.28 ft / 1.00 m Freeboard (% = measuring location as a percentage of overall length): - Stem: 26.25 ft / 8.00 m - Forecastle (15 %): 22.97 ft / 7.00 m - Mid (50 %): 18.04 ft / 5.50 m - Quarterdeck (15 %): 16.40 ft / 5.00 m - Stern: 16.40 ft / 5.00 m - Average freeboard: 19.31 ft / 5.89 m Ship space, strength and comments: Space - Hull below water (magazines/engines, low = better): 87.2 % - Above water (accommodation/working, high = better): 125.2 % Waterplane Area: 17,944 Square feet or 1,667 Square metres Displacement factor (Displacement / loading): 123 % Structure weight / hull surface area: 91 lbs/sq ft or 444 Kg/sq metre Hull strength (Relative): - Cross-sectional: 0.92 - Longitudinal: 2.00 - Overall: 1.00 Hull space for machinery, storage, compartmentation is adequate Room for accommodation and workspaces is excellent Poor seaboat, wet and uncomfortable, reduced performance in heavy weather |
Quoted
Originally posted by TheCanadian
Considering the seastate that Nordish vessels might have to sail in I think that one is better.
Quoted
Originally posted by Valles
Yeah, I don't think I'm going to do any better than that.
Especially not anywhere near that weight.
Forum Software: Burning Board® Lite 2.1.2 pl 1, developed by WoltLab® GmbH