Dear visitor, welcome to WesWorld. If this is your first visit here, please read the Help. It explains in detail how this page works. To use all features of this page, you should consider registering. Please use the registration form, to register here or read more information about the registration process. If you are already registered, please login here.
Quoted
Originally posted by parador
OOC:
The first experiments of thermobaric weapons were conducted in Germany during World War II. The German bombs used coal dust as fuel and were extensively tested in 1943 and 1944, but did not reach mass production before the war ended.
The good old "Greek Fire" was used in the 7th century, Phosporbombs were used in WW1 and last but not least Napalm was invented in 1942.
Quoted
Originally posted by Rooijen10
Even so, the LOx is probably just the oxidizer, not the explosive stuff itself. No idication what they were going to add to it.
Couple of more things in this post here...
http://www.secretprojects.co.uk/forum/in….html#msg133905
Quoted
Originally posted by BruceDuncan
and hard to swallow.
Quoted
Originally posted by Hood
Hmmm, all seems dubious to me. Even if the coal dust was as effective (actually wouldn't coal dust be easier for the Chinese to obtain) it seems crazy to scale it from 60 to 600kg. If we had seen smaller examples being tested then it might have been different. Instead it looks like the thing has been scaled up right from the lab bench.
Quoted
Originally posted by BruceDuncan
Interesting article.
I note that it bears a warning that it lacks insufficient documentation. Coal dust + liquid air does not equal thin liquid petroleum... byt that is just detail.
So the first tests were allegedly done on a 60 kg device and that purportedly larger weapons were in production by 1945... and China runs its first? test on a 600kg air-dropped device.
Quoted
Originally posted by BruceDuncan
They quote the same garbled report in NARA. The fact that one internet site quotes from another doesn't make it any more factual. I'm not saying that exploratory work of this source was not done; but to start with a big-bang-bomb is highly unlikely...and improbable... and hard to swallow.
Quoted
Originally posted by Brockpaine
Seconded.
To be honest, I'm really starting to wonder where a lot of these Chinese weapons are coming from. Let's face it - China's not exactly the richest country in the game. But from watching the Chinese news, they're getting more new toys and more R&D stuff than economic Great Powers like Britain or the US. I might buy into that if China was industrialized on a 1990s level, but it's starting to tax my credulity when 1943 China tests stuff that Germany tested late in World War II...
(Note: please don't take this as an automatic shoot-down of the idea. I can accept some things showing up earlier than historical, provided there's good justification. I'm just feeling the justification is getting paper-thin and is starting to fray along the edges...)
Quoted
Originally posted by parador
I have long considered how or will i answer. Finally i thought to myself, I will write down my point of views. Now you can decide if you still want to have me here or not.
Forum Software: Burning Board® Lite 2.1.2 pl 1, developed by WoltLab® GmbH