You are not logged in.

Dear visitor, welcome to WesWorld. If this is your first visit here, please read the Help. It explains in detail how this page works. To use all features of this page, you should consider registering. Please use the registration form, to register here or read more information about the registration process. If you are already registered, please login here.

1

Friday, May 20th 2005, 4:25am

The dreaded Filipino Antarctic Battleships!

...tho "Antarctic Panzerschiffe" might be more like it. ^_^

Based on the real-world Finnish coast-defense ships, these ships will primarily serve as "normal" CDSes, but have reinforced hulls so that (at least) one will always accompany the Pacifica on its Antarctic voyages of discovery.

Note on armour: the main belt is actually 160mm for a height of 3m, but it thins below that (the sim of 40mm for over an extra 0.5m is an average).

Filipino Bacolod-class "Antarctic Battleship" laid down 1929

Displacement:
3,869 t light; 4,081 t standard; 4,697 t normal; 5,191 t full load

Dimensions: Length overall / water x beam x draught
319.95 ft / 305.12 ft x 54.79 ft x 18.04 ft (normal load)
97.52 m / 93.00 m x 16.70 m x 5.50 m

Armament:
6 - 7.09" / 180 mm guns (2x3 guns), 180.00lbs / 81.65kg shells, 1929 Model
Breech loading guns in turrets (on barbettes)
on centreline ends, evenly spread
4 - 3.94" / 100 mm guns (2x2 guns), 32.00lbs / 14.51kg shells, 1929 Model
Dual purpose guns in deck mounts with hoists
on centreline ends, evenly spread, all raised mounts - superfiring
4 - 3.94" / 100 mm guns (2x2 guns), 30.51lbs / 13.84kg shells, 1929 Model
Dual purpose guns in deck mounts with hoists
on side, all amidships
12 - 0.98" / 25.0 mm guns (4x3 guns), 0.57lbs / 0.26kg shells, 1929 Model
Anti-aircraft guns in deck mounts
on side ends, evenly spread, all raised mounts
8 - 0.54" / 13.7 mm guns in single mounts, 0.11lbs / 0.05kg shells, 1929 Model
Machine guns in deck mounts
on side, evenly spread, all raised mounts

Weight of broadside 1,338 lbs / 607 kg
Shells per gun, main battery: 150

Armour:
- Belts: Width (max) Length (avg) Height (avg)
Main: 4.72" / 120 mm 239.50 ft / 73.00 m 9.84 ft / 3.00 m
Ends: 1.97" / 50 mm 65.62 ft / 20.00 m 9.84 ft / 3.00 m
Upper: 1.57" / 40 mm 108.27 ft / 33.00 m 11.48 ft / 3.50 m
Main Belt covers 121 % of normal length

- Gun armour: Face (max) Other gunhouse (avg) Barbette/hoist (max)
Main: 6.10" / 155 mm 3.15" / 80 mm 4.92" / 125 mm
2nd: 1.18" / 30 mm 0.59" / 15 mm 1.18" / 30 mm
3rd: 1.18" / 30 mm 0.59" / 15 mm 1.18" / 30 mm
4th: 0.59" / 15 mm - -

- Armour deck: 3.15" / 80 mm, Conning tower: 3.15" / 80 mm

Machinery:
Diesel Internal combustion generators,
Electric motors, 2 shafts, 11,527 shp / 8,599 Kw = 20.00 kts
Range 12,500nm at 12.00 kts (Bunkerage = 1,110 tons)

Complement:
283 - 368

Cost:
£1.294 million / $5.174 million

Distribution of weights at normal displacement:
Armament: 165 tons, 3.5 %
Armour: 1,555 tons, 33.1 %
- Belts: 620 tons, 13.2 %
- Torpedo bulkhead: 0 tons, 0.0 %
- Armament: 239 tons, 5.1 %
- Armour Deck: 677 tons, 14.4 %
- Conning Tower: 19 tons, 0.4 %
Machinery: 354 tons, 7.5 %
Hull, fittings & equipment: 1,745 tons, 37.2 %
Fuel, ammunition & stores: 828 tons, 17.6 %
Miscellaneous weights: 50 tons, 1.1 %

Overall survivability and seakeeping ability:
Survivability (Non-critical penetrating hits needed to sink ship):
9,013 lbs / 4,088 Kg = 50.7 x 7.1 " / 180 mm shells or 2.4 torpedoes
Stability (Unstable if below 1.00): 1.08
Metacentric height 2.4 ft / 0.7 m
Roll period: 14.9 seconds
Steadiness - As gun platform (Average = 50 %): 70 %
- Recoil effect (Restricted arc if above 1.00): 0.46
Seaboat quality (Average = 1.00): 1.22

Hull form characteristics:
Hull has a flush deck
Block coefficient: 0.545
Length to Beam Ratio: 5.57 : 1
'Natural speed' for length: 17.47 kts
Power going to wave formation at top speed: 58 %
Trim (Max stability = 0, Max steadiness = 100): 58
Bow angle (Positive = bow angles forward): 30.00 degrees
Stern overhang: 3.28 ft / 1.00 m
Freeboard (% = measuring location as a percentage of overall length):
- Stem: 20.01 ft / 6.10 m
- Forecastle (22 %): 16.40 ft / 5.00 m
- Mid (50 %): 13.12 ft / 4.00 m
- Quarterdeck (22 %): 13.12 ft / 4.00 m
- Stern: 13.12 ft / 4.00 m
- Average freeboard: 14.62 ft / 4.46 m

Ship space, strength and comments:
Space - Hull below water (magazines/engines, low = better): 53.9 %
- Above water (accommodation/working, high = better): 109.0 %
Waterplane Area: 11,612 Square feet or 1,079 Square metres
Displacement factor (Displacement / loading): 129 %
Structure weight / hull surface area: 100 lbs/sq ft or 489 Kg/sq metre
Hull strength (Relative):
- Cross-sectional: 0.97
- Longitudinal: 3.22
- Overall: 1.10
Hull space for machinery, storage, compartmentation is excellent
Room for accommodation and workspaces is adequate
Ship has slow, easy roll, a good, steady gun platform
Good seaboat, rides out heavy weather easily

25t special underwater protection
25t winterization

2

Friday, May 20th 2005, 5:48am

Hmmmm....

So this is the dread battleship Roberts then?

3

Friday, May 20th 2005, 6:12am

So what does an Antarctic battleship shoot?

Snowballs?

4

Friday, May 20th 2005, 7:54am

Penguins have better ballistic properties. Frankly, we in the US can't begin to comprehend just what the h-e-double toothpicks you all are so interested in down there. Its just ICE!!! Miles and miles of endless, unrelenting ice, and wind, and COLD!!!

5

Friday, May 20th 2005, 8:25am

Quoted

Penguins have better ballistic properties.


Play pingu-extreme.

http://www.nata2.info/humor/flash/pinguxtreme.swf

Cheers,

6

Friday, May 20th 2005, 8:49am

Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay too addictive!

I got 850 as my max distance...thats longer than my Battlecruiser Vengeance!

7

Friday, May 20th 2005, 10:34am

850m? Puny. 1017 on my first go.

8

Friday, May 20th 2005, 12:40pm

Uh huh...and I have a bridge to sell!

9

Friday, May 20th 2005, 2:12pm

I think you'd find that your range of 12,000 nm is basically blown on the round trip from the Philippines to Antarctica and back. If you want to actually maintain a presence down there, you'll need a refueling station in the sub-polar region, tanker support, or a greater range.

What's prompted the introduction of seven inch guns?

10

Friday, May 20th 2005, 2:41pm

Quoted

What's prompted the introduction of seven inch guns


The desire to make the quatermaster's job as bad as possible.

11

Friday, May 20th 2005, 3:05pm

Quoted

Originally posted by The Rock Doctor
I think you'd find that your range of 12,000 nm is basically blown on the round trip from the Philippines to Antarctica and back. If you want to actually maintain a presence down there, you'll need a refueling station in the sub-polar region, tanker support, or a greater range.

Hmm, good thing I have that tanker. :-)

Quoted

What's prompted the introduction of seven inch guns?

The fact that 180mm is (essentially) halfway between 155mm and 210mm? ^_^ Seriously, I wanted more than four guns, and I didn't think quad 155s would work on this hull. So, voila.

12

Friday, May 20th 2005, 4:01pm

You know...

I think... you have to be incredibly lucky with the placement of those mines.
Quite bloody as well...

13

Friday, May 20th 2005, 7:07pm

Icebergs

So....how long until we can expect a Habbakuk-type vessel?

14

Friday, May 20th 2005, 10:50pm

Well I haven't made my Antarctic claim just to count penguins (or clubbing them over great distances).
:-)

15

Friday, May 20th 2005, 10:51pm

She'll definitely come in handy

Quoted

I think you'd find that your range of 12,000 nm is basically blown on the round trip from the Philippines to Antarctica and back. If you want to actually maintain a presence down there, you'll need a refueling station in the sub-polar region, tanker support, or a greater range.



Quoted

Hmm, good thing I have that tanker.


You'll need more than one, since any serious icebreaking is done at full power, and is very slow (1-3 knots) work.

16

Friday, May 20th 2005, 11:22pm

This one isn't actually supposed to do the breaking itself, rather to follow along behind the 'breaker.