Dear visitor, welcome to WesWorld. If this is your first visit here, please read the Help. It explains in detail how this page works. To use all features of this page, you should consider registering. Please use the registration form, to register here or read more information about the registration process. If you are already registered, please login here.
Source code |
|
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 |
HMS Kent, Royal Navy 8" Cruiser laid down 1928 Displacement: 9,438 t light; 9,859 t standard; 11,752 t normal; 13,267 t full load Dimensions: Length overall / water x beam x draught 615.64 ft / 610.00 ft x 68.25 ft x 19.00 ft (normal load) 187.65 m / 185.93 m x 20.80 m x 5.79 m Armament: 8 - 8.00" / 203 mm guns (4x2 guns), 256.00lbs / 116.12kg shells, 1928 Model Breech loading guns in turrets (on barbettes) on centreline ends, evenly spread, 2 raised mounts - superfiring 4 - 4.00" / 102 mm guns in single mounts, 32.00lbs / 14.51kg shells, 1928 Model Anti-aircraft guns in deck mounts on side, all amidships 8 - 1.59" / 40.5 mm guns (2x4 guns), 2.00lbs / 0.91kg shells, 1928 Model Anti-aircraft guns in deck mounts on side, evenly spread Weight of broadside 2,192 lbs / 994 kg Shells per gun, main battery: 150 8 - 21.0" / 533.4 mm above water torpedoes Armour: - Belts: Width (max) Length (avg) Height (avg) Main: 1.00" / 25 mm 300.00 ft / 91.44 m 12.00 ft / 3.66 m Ends: 4.00" / 102 mm 100.00 ft / 30.48 m 12.00 ft / 3.66 m 210.00 ft / 64.01 m Unarmoured ends Main Belt covers 76 % of normal length Main belt does not fully cover magazines and engineering spaces - Gun armour: Face (max) Other gunhouse (avg) Barbette/hoist (max) Main: 1.00" / 25 mm 1.00" / 25 mm 1.00" / 25 mm - Armour deck: 1.38" / 35 mm, Conning tower: 1.00" / 25 mm Machinery: Oil fired boilers, steam turbines, Geared drive, 4 shafts, 80,000 shp / 59,680 Kw = 30.68 kts Range 13,200nm at 15.00 kts Bunker at max displacement = 3,408 tons Complement: 563 - 733 Cost: £3.472 million / $13.886 million Distribution of weights at normal displacement: Armament: 274 tons, 2.3 % Armour: 1,202 tons, 10.2 % - Belts: 337 tons, 2.9 % - Torpedo bulkhead: 0 tons, 0.0 % - Armament: 135 tons, 1.1 % - Armour Deck: 719 tons, 6.1 % - Conning Tower: 11 tons, 0.1 % Machinery: 2,491 tons, 21.2 % Hull, fittings & equipment: 5,422 tons, 46.1 % Fuel, ammunition & stores: 2,314 tons, 19.7 % Miscellaneous weights: 50 tons, 0.4 % Overall survivability and seakeeping ability: Survivability (Non-critical penetrating hits needed to sink ship): 20,054 lbs / 9,096 Kg = 78.3 x 8.0 " / 203 mm shells or 2.1 torpedoes Stability (Unstable if below 1.00): 1.25 Metacentric height 4.2 ft / 1.3 m Roll period: 13.9 seconds Steadiness - As gun platform (Average = 50 %): 71 % - Recoil effect (Restricted arc if above 1.00): 0.49 Seaboat quality (Average = 1.00): 1.51 Hull form characteristics: Hull has a flush deck Block coefficient: 0.520 Length to Beam Ratio: 8.94 : 1 'Natural speed' for length: 24.70 kts Power going to wave formation at top speed: 55 % Trim (Max stability = 0, Max steadiness = 100): 47 Bow angle (Positive = bow angles forward): 10.00 degrees Stern overhang: 0.00 ft / 0.00 m Freeboard (% = measuring location as a percentage of overall length): - Stem: 32.00 ft / 9.75 m - Forecastle (20 %): 26.00 ft / 7.92 m - Mid (50 %): 24.00 ft / 7.32 m - Quarterdeck (15 %): 24.00 ft / 7.32 m - Stern: 24.00 ft / 7.32 m - Average freeboard: 25.18 ft / 7.67 m Ship space, strength and comments: Space - Hull below water (magazines/engines, low = better): 87.8 % - Above water (accommodation/working, high = better): 202.9 % Waterplane Area: 28,253 Square feet or 2,625 Square metres Displacement factor (Displacement / loading): 139 % Structure weight / hull surface area: 117 lbs/sq ft or 572 Kg/sq metre Hull strength (Relative): - Cross-sectional: 0.98 - Longitudinal: 2.06 - Overall: 1.06 Hull space for machinery, storage, compartmentation is adequate Room for accommodation and workspaces is excellent Ship has slow, easy roll, a good, steady gun platform Excellent seaboat, comfortable, can fire her guns in the heaviest weather |
Quoted
Originally posted by HoOmAn
Those are big fishes. How many tons will such a monster weight? How do you expect crews to handle them?
Quoted
Originally posted by Red Admiral
Howe; 290lb SAP shells? Armour isn't bad. Maybe a bit more range and seakeeping? Compared to COUNTY-class she is better armoured and armed, but worse suited for her task of of trade protection.
Quoted
G: Whats all the misc. weight for? Planes and extra stores. Would you be better suited by Leander?
Quoted
Fox: Experimental is probably the wrong word. Prototype would be better, as she still counts against cruiser tonnage. Why such high freeboard?
Quoted
CWL = construction water line
lambda = wavelenght, generated by the vessel at a certain speed
amplitude = hight (or depression) maximum of generated wave, is in relationship to lambda.
Imagine a speed, generating a wavelenght equal to CWL (CWL = L) or one of it´s rational fractions [CWL = n X L)].
As the starting point of the generated wave is it´s initial positive maximum A(max), the situation on the stern is the same, e.g. generating a positive maximum amplitude or a mass of raised water to each side of the stern.
Imagine the opposite case, so chosen speed generates a wavelenght equal to o.5, 1.5, 2.5 or so on [CWL = (2n - 1)/2 x L], at stern there is the negative maximum of A.
(n, in both cases, is assumed to be a rational figure, e.g. 1,2,3,...)
1st case: a stagnant mass of water, just right after your stern.
2nd case: a stagnant depression, just right after your stern.
In the first case, you´re just "riding the wave" behind you, this hinders turbulence and hence suction; in the second case it´s just the other way round.
As amplitude increases with wave lenght, this effect grows with speed.
So for every hull there are lower speeds, seeing this effect just marginally at work, but two or more defined higher speeds when the transom stern does it´s best -or worst- for efficiency.
As this is just a rough attempt of explanation, be aware that in ship design n (which I said should be a rational figure) is chosen as a multiple of between 0.80 and 0.95, depending on ship´s lenght in ratio to speed.
E.g. have a look at a Schnellboot hull, or some supertankers.
And, for shure, this effect only works for surface vessels, as we are talking about longitudinal pressure waves, showing their effect on surface.
For a submerged vessel, this wouldn´t work.
Forum Software: Burning Board® Lite 2.1.2 pl 1, developed by WoltLab® GmbH