Dear visitor, welcome to WesWorld. If this is your first visit here, please read the Help. It explains in detail how this page works. To use all features of this page, you should consider registering. Please use the registration form, to register here or read more information about the registration process. If you are already registered, please login here.
:-) no wonder it fited in 5,000 tons. Next version will be bigger.Quoted
I think at the least you'd want deck mounts with hoists to ensure a steady ammunition supply.
Actually my thinking would be the reverse of yours. I feel that one specialized ship is better than 2 multi purpose ships. So it does fit in my plans.Quoted
Foxy - whether or not the design itself is good, does Australia have the resources to invest in this fairly specialized design, and is 1933 the time to do it? I'm in similar shoes and can't help but think that a solid multi-purpose cruiser is a better fit for my overall needs.
Will fix. The after 40mm mount will be split an placed either side of bridge like in my destroyers.Quoted
I wouldn't even bother with the 0.50" deck armor, better to stick it on the CT. Also a little nitpick on the aftermost 40mm mount on the stern. It will be incredibly wet, better to place it along side the foremost mount between the torpedo tubes.
Well the accident happened in bad weather so Australia doesnt think it is too much of a problem.Quoted
The threat is real and it lives somewhere North of Australia.
YesQuoted
What sort of 4.7" guns are you using? 4.7"/40 QF Mk VIII like with Nelson/Invincible here?
Quoted
Will you also provide a top view?
Forum Software: Burning Board® Lite 2.1.2 pl 1, developed by WoltLab® GmbH