Navigation in the Danube River Basin
Background
The river Danube, crossing much of central and south-eastern Europe, plays a vital part in the economies of the nations which border it, and indeed the economy of all of Europe by virtue of the international status of commerce upon it. The Treaty of Paris (1856), which brought to conclusion the Crimean War, ended a long period of contention between Russia, which sought political control of the mouths of the Danube, the riparian principalities (chiefly Romania and Bulgaria) that bordered upon it, Turkey, the nominal suzerain of the region and the major maritime powers – Great Britain and France. To assure unfettered access to the lower reaches of the river, to carry out the necessary works to maintain navigation, and to enforce maritime law, the treaty provided for the creation of the European Commission of the Danube, better known as the
Commission Européenne du Danube (CED). The CED was invested with authority over the three mouths of the river — the Chilia in the north, the Sulina in the middle, and the St. George in the south – while it was originally intended to exist for but two years – it has continued its work until the present day.
While the principle of freedom of navigation was gradually accepted for the entire length of the river, the authority of the CED was not extended beyond its original remit. Instead a separate mixed commission – which would become known as the International Danube Commission (IDC) – was first proposed at the Berlin Conference of 1878, further provided for in the Treaty of London of 1883 and finally imposed in the aftermath of the Great War. Since that time the IDC and CED, working in concert, and in coordination with the riparian nations, have done much to improve the navigation on the Danube and its tributaries, deepening shipping channels, standardising and raising bridge heights to permit larger vessels to ascend the river, and contributing to other public works.
Commerce upon the River
In the course of the Nineteenth Century private merchants and joint-stock companies offered a variety of shipping services along the length of the Danube, using tow-boats and barges for cargo and small, fast packet steamers for passengers. The Austrian Erste Donau Dampfschiffahrts Gesellschaft, founded in 1829, came to dominate the scene – in 1880 operating more than two hundred steamers and tow-boats and more than one thousand barges. In the years immediately prior to the Great War the Hungarian Royal Danube Sea Navigation Company rose to challenge the leading position of the Austrian firm; yet both firms suffered heavily during the period of hostilities, losing their positions of dominance on the river to competitors.
The imposition of an international regime of control in 1918 also saw the entry of foreign capital in large amounts. Dutch financiers took the lead in reviving the Hungarian Royal Danube Sea Navigation Company while the British Furness Withy combine backed the formation of the Anglo-Romanian Danube Navigation Company which in the 1920s dominated traffic on the Danube. The late 1920s was marked by the appearance of the Russian Black Sea Danube Navigation Company and a revival of national carriers under the Romanian, Bulgarian and Yugoslav flags.
Recognition of the importance of the Danube to the economy of Europe led to efforts by the German Government to strengthen the position of national carriers operating along the river. The support granted to the Bayerische Lloyd and the Süddeutsche Donau Schiffahrts Gesellschaft, and, after 1933, the Erste Donau Dampfschiffahrts Gesellschaft, have allowed these firms to successfully compete with the British and Dutch-backed firms.
Recent Developments
Improving political conditions in south-eastern Europe have fostered the growth of commerce, with a general reduction of customs tariffs spurring industrial development and the export of agricultural surpluses. The opening up of wider trade relations between Germany and the Russian Federation have seen the burgeoning of traffic between the ports of the upper Danube and Russian ports on the Black Sea, and, via the extensive Russian river and canal system, ports well inland across Southern Russia.
Improvements to navigation along the river have allowed for the construction of larger river-sea cargo vessels, which are not only capable of sailing the length of the river but of venturing out into the open sea. The Hungarian Royal Danube Sea Navigation Company pioneered this trade in the middle 1920s, opening a service as far as Alexandria. Today it is quite common to see large river-sea vessels flying the flags of many riparian nations in ports across the Levant, and the opening of such direct links have been important in economic development in both regions. In this regard the most ambitious commercial venture to utilise the river is the Danube Intercontinental Navigation and Transport Company, a joint venture of Bulgarian, Romanian, and Yugoslav interests. From 1939 this firm has operated direct sailings from the inland ports of the Danube right across the Mediterranean and the Atlantic to South America, where the handy size of the vessels employed allows them to reach the river port in Brazil, Gran Uruguay, and Argentina.
The establishment of free ports in such centres as Linz, Bratislava, Csepel (Budapest), and Novi Sad has done much to stimulate commerce and industrial development. Factories in the free ports benefit from duty-free imports of raw materials, which are processed and turned into finished products that are again exported. Workers in the factories of the free ports in turn contribute to the domestic economy though increased purchasing power and taxes.
Challenges
The Danube, as all rivers, is hostage to weather in various forms. Low water in summer can made navigation difficult, while high water in spring – caused by the winter thaw – can bring flooding that halts navigation over much of the river. On the upper reaches of the river winter ice brings an early end to navigation, though in the lower reaches of the river vessels can usually operate year round. In the lower course of the river the fight against silt in the channels is constant. The CED, in conjunction with the Romanian Government, maintains a small fleet of dredges that keep the main routes open.
The greatest challenge to navigation is the strength of the river itself. Where it narrows a vessel may find itself carried away by the current; in the days before the work of the CED and IDC such occurrences were far more frequent than today. The Iron Gates, on the border between Romania and Yugoslavia, remain the most dangerous and difficult of the river’s narrows. Despite the blasting of the Sip Channel (completed in 1896) vessels ascending the river require the assistance of towing locomotives to fight against the might of the river’s seaward flow.