Search results
Search results 1-20 of 1,000. There are even more results, please redefine your search.
So long and thanks for the job! Well, the inevitable has happened. After 78 years in business, the firm of W.B.Peat & co. Ltd has gone into voluntary liquidation. Yours truly is out on his ear!! Guess I'll be getting a lot of DIY done over the coming months!
Iberia and Denmark would participate.....
Quoted Originally posted by Brockpaine I've used Statsraad Lehmkuhl in the 1938 and 1941 Tall Ships Races, and the 1941 Tall Ships Challenge. You mean this ship? Yup, drooled on her deck too!! Lovely vessel, with VERY cute crewgirl manning (womaning?) the souvenir stand.
Denmark and Iberia will field the same ships as previous years. And over the weekend of August 24th to 27th, I will be drooling all over the decks of DANMARK, as she will be attending the Dublin Tall Ships Festival, the finish line of this years race!!!!
The photos are impressive, but I love to see them in real life. I'd imagine the spectacle is amazing!!!
Denmark - salient points -Some sabre rattling in the 1920's which caused Iberia and Italy to send units to Denmark as a trip-line. -Denmark was on high alert when the assassination of the Nordmarkian Royal Family happened, due to fear of being blamed (see above). -Denmark as a result doesn't "trust" Nordmark, and have instigated the Octopus and Erilaz programs to aid in it's defence. Iberia - With the exception of the 1920's Denmark incident, Iberia's dealing with Nordmark would be neutral
Danish Naval Developments Q3 1941 a/ Industrial Allocation 11/11 factories producing materiel for shipbuilding = 11000 tons 0/11 factories (fixed) producing infrastructure materiel =0.0 points 0/11 Factories producing infrastructure materiel = 0.0 points b/ Infrastructure Development None c/ Naval Construction Copenhagen- No.1 type 3 slip – Idle No.2 type 2 slip – Idle No.3 type 1 slip – Idle No.4 type 1 slip – Idle No.1 type 3 drydock – Idle Dock side - Idle Aarhus- No.1 type 3.5 slip – Idle No...
Danish Naval Developments Q2 1941 a/ Industrial Allocation 11/11 factories producing materiel for shipbuilding = 11000 tons 0/11 factories (fixed) producing infrastructure materiel =0.0 points 0/11 Factories producing infrastructure materiel = 0.0 points b/ Infrastructure Development None c/ Naval Construction Copenhagen- No.1 type 3 slip – No.2 type 2 slip – Ue 55, Ue 56, SUB, laid down 01/03/1941, receives 109 tons each to complete No.3 type 1 slip – Ue 57, Ue 58, SUB, laid down 01/03/1941, re...
Danish Naval Developments Q1 1941 a/ Industrial Allocation 11/11 factories producing materiel for shipbuilding = 11000 tons 0/11 factories (fixed) producing infrastructure materiel =0.0 points 0/11 Factories producing infrastructure materiel = 0.0 points b/ Infrastructure Development None c/ Naval Construction Copenhagen- No.1 type 3 slip – No.2 type 2 slip – Ue 55, Ue 56, SUB, laid down 01/03/1941, receives 244 tons each, balance 109 tons each No.3 type 1 slip – Ue 57, Ue 58, SUB, laid down 01/...
Quoted Originally posted by Brockpaine [SIZE=1]Note - ha, I have ten thousand posts now![/SIZE] You're on here over 3 years less than me and have over 3 times the posts.....you need an off-line hobby!!
...All the accumulated wisdom of generations of men, and you still asked her? Just kidding! Great news Brock My best wishes to you and your good Lady!
Quoted Originally posted by HoOmAn Me not. Family sick. :o( Hope they all get well soon.
Quoted Originally posted by eltf177 So Gibbs and Cox, unable to sell it to the Soviets, manage to convince the USN to build it! And you have to wonder about the design philosophy that puts a couple of seaplane catapults on the stern of what is essentially an aircraft carrier.....
3 quads and 2 twins maybe.....
ahhh....Undone and undone? Brock, check your pm's!
Her direct answer to the question Brock...... "Might be a good idea"
Quoted Originally posted by TheCanadian Quoted Originally posted by The Rock Doctor Don't get cheeky, lad... *covers Tex's eyes* Yes, its a bit drafty for it, and Lady Green might not approve. Or she may approve, tis not my place to speculate further however. The good Lady is not a fan of smoked fish products, but is a keen recycler/repurposer, and therefore sees this alternate use of smoked fish as acceptable. She'd tell you herself, but she can't remember her password!
Quoted Originally posted by Desertfox *completely misses the intended annoyance* In reply, I give you this! Quoted Originally posted by Desertfox PLEASE don't involve India in any more wars!!! Zunge raus Rocky, I see (it is quite close after all ) your pie, and I raise you a Kipper across the cheek!
WesWorld »
Tuesday, April 16th 2024, 10:29am
Go to the top of the page
